Wang Zhipeng, Xu Lei, Wang Han, Li Zhenzhi, Lu Lu, Li Xiaojia, Zhang Qingyuan
Department of Medical Oncology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China.
Genetics Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2018 Jul;25(5):909-916. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2018.01.011. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
The goal of this study was to assess the antitumor efficacy and safety of lobaplatin-based regimens as the second line of treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) resistant to anthracyclines and taxanes, compared with that of cisplatin-based regimens. During August 2012 to April 2015, 87 patients who received lobaplatin-based regimens or cisplatin-based regimens were included. Medical records of the patients noted that lobaplatin (30 mg/m) or cisplatin (25 mg/m), combined with another chemotherapeutic agent such as Gemcitabine (1000 mg/m) or Vinorelbine (25 mg/m), was intravenously given to the patients on a basis of twenty-one days as one treatment cycle. All the patients were followed until August 2017. The endpoint of this study was progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and estimated objective response rate (RR). Safety and drug tolerability data were also obtained. Lobaplatin-based regimens prolonged PFS compared to cisplatin-based regimens (median 13.2 vs 4.7 months, hazard ratio = 0.37, 95% confidence intervals: 0.21-0.67, = .0007), while OS was not significantly different between the two groups (hazard ratio = 0.72, 95% confidence intervals: 0.40-1.30, = .2767), as was objective RR (37.8% vs 33.4%, = 0.19, = .6653). Nausea/vomiting and renal injury were more frequent with cisplatin-based regimens. Our results show that lobaplatin-based regimens are superior to cisplatin in terms of efficacy and are better tolerated.
本研究的目的是评估以洛铂为基础的方案作为蒽环类和紫杉类耐药的转移性乳腺癌(MBC)患者二线治疗的抗肿瘤疗效和安全性,并与以顺铂为基础的方案进行比较。在2012年8月至2015年4月期间,纳入了87例接受以洛铂为基础的方案或以顺铂为基础的方案的患者。患者的病历显示,洛铂(30mg/m)或顺铂(25mg/m)与另一种化疗药物如吉西他滨(1000mg/m)或长春瑞滨(25mg/m)联合使用,每21天静脉给药一次作为一个治疗周期。所有患者均随访至2017年8月。本研究的终点是无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和估计客观缓解率(RR)。同时还获得了安全性和药物耐受性数据。与以顺铂为基础的方案相比,以洛铂为基础的方案延长了PFS(中位值13.2个月对4.7个月,风险比=0.37,95%置信区间:0.21-0.67,P=0.0007),而两组之间的OS无显著差异(风险比=0.72,95%置信区间:0.40-1.30,P=0.2767),客观RR也无显著差异(37.8%对33.4%,P=0.19,P=0.6653)。以顺铂为基础的方案恶心/呕吐和肾损伤更常见。我们的结果表明,以洛铂为基础的方案在疗效方面优于顺铂,且耐受性更好。