Brüggemann Petra, Szczepek Agnieszka J, Rose Matthias, McKenna Laurence, Olze Heidi, Mazurek Birgit
Tinnitus Center, Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin, Germany.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin, Germany.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Jun 29;10:341. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00341. eCollection 2016.
The primary cause of subjective tinnitus is a dysfunction of the auditory system; however, the degree of distress tinnitus causes depends largely on the psychological status of the patient. Our goal was to attempt to associate the grade of tinnitus-related distress with the psychological distress, physical, or psychological discomfort patients experienced, as well as potentially relevant social parameters, through a simultaneous analysis of these factors.
We determined the level of tinnitus-related distress in 531 tinnitus patients using the German version of the tinnitus questionnaire (TQ). In addition, we used the Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ); General Depression Scale Allgemeine Depression Skala (ADS), Berlin Mood Questionnaire (BSF); somatic symptoms inventory (BI), and SF-8 health survey as well as general information collected through a medical history.
The TQ score significantly correlated with a score obtained using PSQ, ADS, BSF, BI, and SF-8 alongside psychosocial factors such as age, gender, and marital status. The level of hearing loss and the auditory properties of the specific tinnitus combined with perceived stress and the degree of depressive mood and somatic discomfort of a patient were identified as medium-strong predictors of chronic tinnitus. Social factors such as gender, age, or marital status also had an impact on the degree of tinnitus distress. The results that were obtained were implemented in a specific cortical distress network model.
Using a large representative sample of patients with chronic tinnitus permitted a simultaneous statistical measurement of psychometric and audiological parameters in predicting tinnitus distress. We demonstrate that single factors can be distinguished in a manner that explains their causative association and influence on the induction of tinnitus-related distress.
主观性耳鸣的主要原因是听觉系统功能障碍;然而,耳鸣引起的痛苦程度很大程度上取决于患者的心理状态。我们的目标是通过对这些因素的同步分析,尝试将耳鸣相关痛苦的等级与患者经历的心理痛苦、身体或心理不适以及潜在相关的社会参数联系起来。
我们使用耳鸣问卷(TQ)的德文版确定了531名耳鸣患者的耳鸣相关痛苦程度。此外,我们使用了感知压力问卷(PSQ)、一般抑郁量表(ADS)、柏林情绪问卷(BSF)、躯体症状量表(BI)和SF-8健康调查以及通过病史收集的一般信息。
TQ评分与使用PSQ、ADS、BSF、BI和SF-8获得的评分以及年龄、性别和婚姻状况等社会心理因素显著相关。听力损失程度和特定耳鸣的听觉特性,结合感知压力、抑郁情绪程度和患者的躯体不适,被确定为慢性耳鸣的中强预测因素。性别、年龄或婚姻状况等社会因素也对耳鸣痛苦程度有影响。所得结果被应用于一个特定的皮质痛苦网络模型。
使用大量具有代表性的慢性耳鸣患者样本,可以在预测耳鸣痛苦时同时对心理测量和听力学参数进行统计测量。我们证明,可以以一种解释其因果关联以及对耳鸣相关痛苦诱发的影响的方式区分单一因素。