Suppr超能文献

评估抽象艺术:术语使用、主观评分、图像属性与人格特质之间的关系。

Evaluating Abstract Art: Relation between Term Usage, Subjective Ratings, Image Properties and Personality Traits.

作者信息

Lyssenko Nathalie, Redies Christoph, Hayn-Leichsenring Gregor U

机构信息

Experimental Aesthetics Group, Institute of Anatomy I, University of Jena School of Medicine, Jena University Hospital Jena, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2016 Jun 28;7:973. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00973. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

One of the major challenges in experimental aesthetics is the uncertainty of the terminology used in experiments. In this study, we recorded terms that are spontaneously used by participants to describe abstract artworks and studied their relation to the second-order statistical image properties of the same artworks (Experiment 1). We found that the usage frequency of some structure-describing terms correlates with statistical image properties, such as PHOG Self-Similarity, Anisotropy and Complexity. Additionally, emotion-associated terms correlate with measured color values. Next, based on the most frequently used terms, we created five different rating scales (Experiment 2) and obtained ratings of participants for the abstract paintings on these scales. We found significant correlations between descriptive score ratings (e.g., between structure and subjective complexity), between evaluative and descriptive score ratings (e.g., between preference and subjective complexity/interest) and between descriptive score ratings and statistical image properties (e.g., between interest and PHOG Self-Similarity, Complexity and Anisotropy). Additionally, we determined the participants' personality traits as described in the 'Big Five Inventory' (Goldberg, 1990; Rammstedt and John, 2005) and correlated them with the ratings and preferences of individual participants. Participants with higher scores for Neuroticism showed preferences for objectively more complex images, as well as a different notion of the term complex when compared with participants with lower scores for Neuroticism. In conclusion, this study demonstrates an association between objectively measured image properties and the subjective terms that participants use to describe or evaluate abstract artworks. Moreover, our results suggest that the description of abstract artworks, their evaluation and the preference of participants for their low-level statistical properties are linked to personality traits.

摘要

实验美学中的一个主要挑战是实验中使用的术语的不确定性。在本研究中,我们记录了参与者自发用来描述抽象艺术作品的术语,并研究了它们与同一艺术作品的二阶统计图像属性之间的关系(实验1)。我们发现,一些描述结构的术语的使用频率与统计图像属性相关,如PHOG自相似性、各向异性和复杂性。此外,与情感相关的术语与测量的颜色值相关。接下来,基于最常用的术语,我们创建了五个不同的评分量表(实验2),并在这些量表上获得了参与者对抽象绘画的评分。我们发现描述性评分之间存在显著相关性(例如,结构与主观复杂性之间)、评价性与描述性评分之间存在显著相关性(例如,偏好与主观复杂性/兴趣之间)以及描述性评分与统计图像属性之间存在显著相关性(例如,兴趣与PHOG自相似性、复杂性和各向异性之间)。此外,我们根据“大五人格量表”(戈德堡,1990;拉姆施泰特和约翰,2005)确定了参与者的人格特质,并将它们与个体参与者的评分和偏好进行了关联。神经质得分较高的参与者表现出对客观上更复杂图像的偏好,并且与神经质得分较低的参与者相比,对“复杂”一词有不同的理解。总之,本研究证明了客观测量的图像属性与参与者用于描述或评价抽象艺术作品的主观术语之间存在关联。此外,我们的结果表明,抽象艺术作品的描述、评价以及参与者对其低层次统计属性的偏好与人格特质有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e74/4923070/cf74b732cea0/fpsyg-07-00973-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验