Suppr超能文献

踝关节化脓性关节炎的关节融合术:危险因素及并发症

Arthrodesis for septic arthritis of the ankle: risk factors and complications.

作者信息

Suda A J, Richter A, Abou-Nouar G, Jazzazi M, Tinelli M, Bischel O E

机构信息

Department of Septic Surgery, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Ludwig-Guttmann-Strasse 13, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Germany.

Section of Bone- and Soft Tissue Infection, German Society of Orthopedics and Traumatologists (DGOU Deutsche Gesellschaft für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie), Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 Oct;136(10):1343-8. doi: 10.1007/s00402-016-2520-y. Epub 2016 Jul 22.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Septic ankle joint arthrodesis is a good therapeutic option in cases of infection after trauma or orthopedic surgical procedures. Many different procedures have been described, but external fixation seems to be standard. Aim of this study is to identify risk factors for complications in septic ankle joint arthrodesis with the external AO frame fixator.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who received septic ankle joint arthrodesis between January 2008 and December 2012 were included in this study. Patients were evaluated clinically and with radiographs or CT scans.

RESULTS

Follow-up of 74 of 79 patients with an external AO frame fixator could be evaluated; follow-up was 411 days (105-991). The mean age at surgery was 57.7 years (19-87). At this time, complications occurred in 41 patients (52 %) with wound healing problems (17 patients, 22 %) and non-union (12 patients, 15 %), and some needed surgical revision. In our collective, men had a significant higher non-union rate (p = 0.031), age or BMI showed no difference. Patients with diabetes and alcohol consumption showed a higher risk for complications (p = 0.049 and p = 0.031, respectively). 62 % of primary arthrodesis showed union, whereas in the case of revision, arthrodesis only 39 % showed union.

CONCLUSIONS

Septic ankle joint arthrodesis with the external AO frame fixator is a probable tool to achieve union. This study showed that there is a high complication rate and some risk factors for complications could be identified. A blinded and prospective study is needed to compare intramedullary nailing and external fixation to evaluate the possible advantage of intramedullary devices in septic ankle arthrodesis.

摘要

引言

创伤或骨科手术后感染的情况下,感染性踝关节融合术是一种良好的治疗选择。已经描述了许多不同的手术方法,但外固定似乎是标准方法。本研究的目的是确定使用AO外固定架进行感染性踝关节融合术并发症的危险因素。

材料与方法

本研究纳入了2008年1月至2012年12月期间接受感染性踝关节融合术的患者。对患者进行临床评估,并进行X线片或CT扫描。

结果

79例使用AO外固定架的患者中有74例获得随访;随访时间为411天(105 - 991天)。手术时的平均年龄为57.7岁(19 - 87岁)。此时,41例患者(52%)出现并发症,包括伤口愈合问题(17例,22%)和骨不连(12例,15%),部分患者需要手术翻修。在我们的研究群体中,男性骨不连发生率显著更高(p = 0.031),年龄或体重指数无差异。糖尿病患者和饮酒患者并发症风险更高(分别为p = 0.049和p = 0.031)。初次融合术62%实现骨愈合,而翻修融合术仅39%实现骨愈合。

结论

使用AO外固定架进行感染性踝关节融合术是实现骨愈合的一种可行方法。本研究表明并发症发生率较高,且可识别出一些并发症的危险因素。需要进行一项盲法前瞻性研究,比较髓内钉固定和外固定,以评估髓内装置在感染性踝关节融合术中的潜在优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验