Childs Emma, de Wit Harriet
Department of Psychiatry, The University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Addiction. 2016 Dec;111(12):2157-2165. doi: 10.1111/add.13540. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
To test whether non-dependent drinkers show place preference for a location paired with alcohol, and to test if the amount of time spent in the alcohol-paired location is related to self-reported subjective alcohol effects experienced in that environment.
Two groups of subjects completed six conditioning sessions: three with alcohol (0.8 g/kg) and three without alcohol. Individuals were assigned randomly to two groups, paired and unpaired, in a 2 : 1 ratio. The paired group (n = 78) received alcohol in one testing room and no-alcohol in another testing room (biased assignment). The unpaired group (n = 30) received alcohol and no-alcohol in each testing room.
Human Behavioral Pharmacology Laboratory, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA (single site).
Healthy male and female social drinkers (n = 108) aged 21-40 years participated in the study (consisting of 10 separate laboratory visits) between March 2012 and August 2014 (an average of 36 separate subject visits per month).
The primary outcome measure was the pre- to post-conditioning change in the percentage of time spent in the least preferred room (obtained during drug-free exploration tests conducted at separate visits before and after the six conditioning sessions were completed). Secondary measures included self-reported subjective mood and drug effects obtained during the conditioning sessions.
The groups differed in the change in the percentage of time spent in the initially least preferred room, from pre- to post-conditioning; paired group = 11.0%, unpaired group = -1.4%, mean difference = 12.4%, 95% confidence interval = 1.9-23.0, P = 0.02. The change in the percentage of time spent in the least-preferred room was related to the self-reported sedative effects of alcohol during conditioning sessions among paired group participants only.
Non-dependent consumers of alcohol appear to develop a behavioral preference for locations paired with alcohol consumption, more so for those who experience sedative effects from alcohol in those locations.
测试非依赖型饮酒者是否会对与酒精配对的地点表现出位置偏好,并测试在与酒精配对的地点所花费的时间是否与在该环境中自我报告的主观酒精效应相关。
两组受试者完成了六个条件反射训练环节:三个环节使用酒精(0.8克/千克),三个环节不使用酒精。个体被随机分配到两组,配对组和非配对组,比例为2:1。配对组(n = 78)在一个测试室接受酒精,在另一个测试室接受无酒精饮料(偏向性分配)。非配对组(n = 30)在每个测试室接受酒精和无酒精饮料。
美国伊利诺伊州芝加哥大学人类行为药理学实验室(单一地点)。
年龄在21至40岁之间的健康男性和女性社交饮酒者(n = 108)于2012年3月至2014年8月期间参与了该研究(包括10次单独的实验室访问)(平均每月36次单独的受试者访问)。
主要结果测量指标是在最不喜欢的房间所花费时间的百分比在条件反射训练前后的变化(在完成六个条件反射训练环节前后的单独访问中进行的无药物探索测试中获得)。次要测量指标包括在条件反射训练环节中自我报告的主观情绪和药物效应。
两组在从训练前到训练后在最初最不喜欢的房间所花费时间的百分比变化方面存在差异;配对组 = 11.0%,非配对组 = -1.4%,平均差异 = 12.4%,95%置信区间 = 1.9 - 23.0,P = 0.02。仅在配对组参与者中,在最不喜欢的房间所花费时间的百分比变化与在条件反射训练环节中自我报告的酒精镇静效应相关。
非依赖型酒精消费者似乎会对与饮酒配对的地点产生行为偏好,对于那些在这些地点体验到酒精镇静效应的人来说更是如此。