Sandroff Brian M, Motl Robert W, Scudder Mark R, DeLuca John
Kessler Foundation, 1199 Pleasant Valley Way, West Orange, NJ, 07052, USA.
Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Louise Freer Hall, 906 S. Goodwin Ave, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.
Neuropsychol Rev. 2016 Sep;26(3):271-294. doi: 10.1007/s11065-016-9324-2. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
Cognitive dysfunction is highly prevalent, disabling, and poorly-managed in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). Recent evidence suggests that exercise might have beneficial effects on cognition in this population. The current systematic, evidence-based review examined the existing literature on exercise, physical activity, and physical fitness effects on cognition in MS to accurately describe the current status of the field, offer recommendations for clinicians, and identify study-specific and participant-specific characteristics for providing future direction for ongoing MS research. We performed an open-dated search of Medline, PsychInfo, and CINAHL in December 2015. The search strategy involved using the terms 'exercise' OR 'physical activity' OR 'physical fitness' OR 'aerobic' OR 'resistance' OR 'balance' OR 'walking' OR 'yoga' OR 'training' OR 'rehabilitation' AND 'multiple sclerosis'. Articles were eliminated from the systematic review if it was a review article, theoretical paper, or textbook chapter; did not involve persons with MS; involved only persons with pediatric-onset MS; did not involve neuropsychological outcomes; did not include empirical data to evaluate outcomes; involved pharmacological interventions; or was not available in English. The selected articles were first classified as examining exercise, physical activity, or physical fitness, and were then randomly assigned to 2 independent reviewers who rated each article for level of evidence based on American Academy of Neurology criteria. Reviewers further completed a table to characterize important elements of each study (i.e., intervention characteristics), the cognitive domain(s) that were targeted, participant-specific characteristics, outcome measures, and study results. The present review resulted in 26 studies on the effects of exercise, physical activity, and physical fitness on cognition in persons with MS. This included 1 Class I study, 3 Class II studies, 8 Class III studies, and 14 Class IV studies. Of the 26 total studies, 6 were randomized controlled trials. Overall, there is conflicting evidence for the effects of exercise on cognition in MS, and overall positive, but not definitive evidence for the effects of physical activity and physical fitness, respectively, on cognition in this population. Collectively, there is insufficient well-designed research to definitively conclude that exercise, physical activity, and physical fitness are effective for improving cognition in MS. This is based, in part, on methodological issues of Class I and II studies, such as inclusion of cognition as a secondary outcome (35 % of reviewed studies), poorly-developed exercise interventions, and paucity of research that included cognitively-impaired MS samples. However, promising evidence from Class III and Class IV studies may be useful for informing the development of better intervention research.
认知功能障碍在多发性硬化症(MS)患者中极为普遍,会导致残疾,且管理不善。最近的证据表明,运动可能对该人群的认知有有益影响。当前这项基于证据的系统综述研究了关于运动、身体活动和身体素质对MS患者认知影响的现有文献,以准确描述该领域的现状,为临床医生提供建议,并确定研究特定和参与者特定的特征,为正在进行的MS研究提供未来方向。我们于2015年12月对Medline、PsychInfo和CINAHL进行了不限定日期的检索。检索策略包括使用“运动”或“身体活动”或“身体素质”或“有氧运动”或“抗阻运动”或“平衡训练”或“步行”或“瑜伽”或“训练”或“康复”以及“多发性硬化症”等术语。如果文章是综述文章、理论论文或教科书章节;不涉及MS患者;仅涉及儿童期发病的MS患者;不涉及神经心理学结果;不包括评估结果的实证数据;涉及药物干预;或没有英文版本,则从系统综述中剔除。所选文章首先被归类为研究运动、身体活动或身体素质的文章,然后随机分配给2名独立评审员,他们根据美国神经病学学会的标准对每篇文章的证据水平进行评分。评审员还进一步完成了一个表格,以描述每项研究的重要元素(即干预特征)、所针对的认知领域、参与者特定特征、结果测量和研究结果。本综述产生了26项关于运动、身体活动和身体素质对MS患者认知影响的研究。其中包括1项I类研究、3项II类研究、8项III类研究和14项IV类研究。在总共26项研究中,6项为随机对照试验。总体而言,关于运动对MS患者认知影响的证据相互矛盾,而关于身体活动和身体素质对该人群认知影响的证据总体上是积极的,但并不确凿。总体而言,没有足够的精心设计的研究来明确得出运动、身体活动和身体素质对改善MS患者认知有效的结论。这部分是基于I类和II类研究的方法学问题,例如将认知作为次要结果纳入(35%的综述研究)、运动干预设计不完善以及纳入认知受损MS样本的研究较少。然而,III类和IV类研究的有前景证据可能有助于为更好的干预研究的开展提供信息。