Curtis D J, Riordan D D, Cruess D F, Brower A C
George Washington University Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Washington, DC 20037.
Invest Radiol. 1989 Apr;24(4):324-30. doi: 10.1097/00004424-198904000-00012.
Radiology resident candidate selection has become a burdensome, subjective, and somewhat arbitrary process. Because the luxury of many well-qualified candidates exists, there is an obligation to select them as honestly, equitably, and objectively as possible. Two years were spent in revising and modifying the resident selection process to make it more uniform and more efficacious. An application scoring form was devised to extract uniform pertinent information from the original application form. Candidates could then be ranked according to a numerical score derived from the form. This allowed easy selection of top candidates to be interviewed. A new interviewing scoring form was developed to include desirable characteristics of resident candidate performance. This form was also devised in such a way as to be easily scored and to allow selection of the top 20 to 25 candidates. These candidates were then ranked by participating faculty members while reviewing their application score forms and their interview forms. Positions for the residency training program were offered according to the ranking. The usefulness of both new forms was evaluated and confirmed by correlating form scores with faculty ranking of academic performance of current residents in the training program.
放射科住院医师候选人的选拔已成为一个繁琐、主观且有些随意的过程。由于存在许多资质优秀的候选人，所以有义务尽可能诚实地、公平地和客观地挑选他们。我们花了两年时间修订和完善住院医师选拔流程，使其更加统一且高效。设计了一份申请评分表，以便从原始申请表中提取统一的相关信息。然后可以根据该表格得出的数字分数对候选人进行排名。这使得能够轻松挑选出排名靠前的候选人进行面试。开发了一种新的面试评分表，纳入住院医师候选人表现中令人期望的特征。该表格的设计方式还便于评分，并能选出前20至25名候选人。然后，参与选拔的教员在查看候选人的申请评分表和面试表时，对这些候选人进行排名。根据排名为住院医师培训项目提供职位。通过将表格分数与培训项目中现任住院医师学术表现的教员排名进行关联，对这两种新表格的实用性进行了评估和确认。
