• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计时起立行走(TUG)测试:20至59岁的标准参考值及其与身心健康风险因素的关系。

Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test: Normative Reference Values for Ages 20 to 59 Years and Relationships With Physical and Mental Health Risk Factors.

作者信息

Kear Breelan M, Guck Thomas P, McGaha Amy L

机构信息

1 Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA.

出版信息

J Prim Care Community Health. 2017 Jan;8(1):9-13. doi: 10.1177/2150131916659282. Epub 2016 Jul 25.

DOI:10.1177/2150131916659282
PMID:27450179
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5932649/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test is a reliable, cost-effective, safe, and time-efficient way to evaluate overall functional mobility. However, the TUG does not have normative reference values (NRV) for individuals younger than 60 years. The purpose of this study was to establish NRV for the TUG for individuals aged between 20 and 59 years and to examine the relationship between the TUG and demographic, physical, and mental health risk factors.

METHODS

Two hundred participants, 50 per decade (ages 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59 years) were selected at their primary care visit, and timed as they performed the TUG by standing up out of a chair, walking 3 m, turning around, walking back to the chair, and sitting down. Information regarding the risk factors socioeconomic status, body mass index, an index of multimorbidities, perceptions of overall physical and mental health was obtained and used as predictors of TUG time independent of age.

RESULTS

TUG times were significantly different among the decades ( F = 6.579, P = .001) with slower times occurring with the 50-year-old decade compared with the 20s ( P = .001), 30s ( P = .001), and 40s ( P = .020). Slower TUG times were associated with lower SES, higher body mass index, more medical comorbidities, and worse perceived physical and mental health. Regression results indicated that perceived physical and mental health accounted for unique variance in the prediction of TUG time beyond age, gender, and socioeconomic status.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provided TUG NRV for adults in their 20s, 30s, 40s, and 50s. The TUG may have utility for primary care providers as they assess and monitor physical activity in younger adults, especially those with physical and mental health risk factors.

摘要

目的

定时起立行走(TUG)测试是一种评估整体功能活动能力的可靠、经济高效、安全且省时的方法。然而,TUG测试对于60岁以下人群没有规范参考值(NRV)。本研究的目的是为20至59岁的个体建立TUG测试的NRV,并研究TUG与人口统计学、身体和心理健康风险因素之间的关系。

方法

在初级保健就诊时选取200名参与者,每十年50名(年龄20 - 29岁、30 - 39岁、40 - 49岁、50 - 59岁),记录他们从椅子上站起来、行走3米、转身、走回椅子并坐下完成TUG测试的时间。获取有关社会经济地位、体重指数、多种疾病指数、整体身心健康感知等风险因素的信息,并将其用作独立于年龄的TUG时间预测指标。

结果

各十年间的TUG时间存在显著差异(F = 6.579,P = .001),与20多岁(P = .001)、30多岁(P = .001)和40多岁(P = .020)相比,50多岁的TUG时间较慢。较慢的TUG时间与较低的社会经济地位、较高 的体重指数、更多的医疗合并症以及较差的身心健康感知相关。回归结果表明,身心健康感知在预测TUG时间方面,除年龄、性别和社会经济地位外,还占独特的方差。

结论

本研究为20多岁、30多岁、40多岁和50多岁的成年人提供了TUG测试的NRV。TUG测试可能有助于初级保健提供者评估和监测年轻成年人的身体活动,尤其是那些有身心健康风险因素的人。

相似文献

1
Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test: Normative Reference Values for Ages 20 to 59 Years and Relationships With Physical and Mental Health Risk Factors.计时起立行走(TUG)测试:20至59岁的标准参考值及其与身心健康风险因素的关系。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2017 Jan;8(1):9-13. doi: 10.1177/2150131916659282. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
2
Reference Values, Determinants and Regression Equation for the Timed-Up and Go Test (TUG) in Healthy Asian Population Aged 21 to 85 Years.21 至 85 岁健康亚洲人群定时起立行走测试(TUG)的参考值、决定因素和回归方程。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 May 3;20(9):5712. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20095712.
3
Erratum.勘误
Mult Scler. 2016 Oct;22(12):NP9-NP11. doi: 10.1177/1352458515585718. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
4
A comparative study of the five-times-sit-to-stand and timed-up-and-go tests as measures of functional mobility in persons with and without injection-related venous ulcers.一项关于五次坐立试验和计时起立行走试验的比较研究,该研究将这两项试验作为有或无注射相关静脉溃疡患者功能活动能力的衡量指标。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2014 Feb;27(2):82-92; quiz 93-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000442876.94332.26.
5
Association between dual task-related decrease in walking speed and real versus imagined Timed Up and Go test performance.步行速度与真实和想象的计时起立行走测试表现之间的关联与双重任务相关的下降。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2013 Jun;25(3):283-9. doi: 10.1007/s40520-013-0046-5. Epub 2013 May 17.
6
The physical capabilities underlying timed "Up and Go" test are time-dependent in community-dwelling older women.在社区居住的老年女性中, timed "Up and Go" 测试所依赖的身体能力是与时间相关的。
Exp Gerontol. 2018 Apr;104:138-146. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2018.01.025. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
7
Further construct validity of the Timed Up-and-Go Test as a measure of ambulation in multiple sclerosis patients.作为衡量多发性硬化症患者活动能力的计时起立行走测试的进一步构建效度。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017 Dec;53(6):841-847. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04599-3. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
8
Normative values for the Timed 'Up and Go' test in children and adolescents and validation for individuals with Down syndrome.儿童和青少年 timed 'Up and Go' 测试的正常值及唐氏综合征患者的验证。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2014 May;56(5):490-7. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12290. Epub 2013 Nov 8.
9
Normative scores for the Timed Up & Go in a Spanish sample of community-dweller adults with preserved functionality.具有正常功能的社区居住成年人西班牙语样本中的计时起立行走测试的常模评分。
Aten Primaria. 2021 Aug-Sep;53(7):102065. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2021.102065. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
10
Timed Up and Go: Reference Data for Children Who Are School Age.计时起立行走测试:学龄儿童的参考数据。
Pediatr Phys Ther. 2016 Summer;28(2):239-46. doi: 10.1097/PEP.0000000000000239.

引用本文的文献

1
Four-week remotely supervised aerobic exercise during the COVID-19 era: Exploring physical performance and psychosocial health in adults without COVID-19 living in rural settings.新冠疫情期间为期四周的远程监督有氧运动:探究生活在农村地区未感染新冠病毒的成年人的身体机能和心理健康状况。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Aug 29;104(35):e44016. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000044016.
2
Physiotherapy in Prehabilitation for Bariatric Surgery-Analysis of Its Impact on Functional Capacity and Original Predictive Models of Functional Status Outcome.减重手术术前康复中的物理治疗——分析其对功能能力及功能状态结局原始预测模型的影响
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 25;14(15):5265. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155265.
3
Transcranial direct current stimulation over motor cortex improves pain in end stage renal disease a randomized controlled trial.经颅直流电刺激运动皮层可改善终末期肾病患者的疼痛:一项随机对照试验
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21943. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96415-7.
4
Nutritional and Physical Rehabilitation in Post-Critical Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Ambulatory Patients: The NutriEcoMuscle Study.2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)康复期门诊患者的营养与身体康复:NutriEcoMuscle研究
Nutrients. 2025 May 20;17(10):1722. doi: 10.3390/nu17101722.
5
Relationship Between Infrared Thermography and Functional Parameters in the Lower Limbs of Hemiplegic Patients.偏瘫患者下肢红外热成像与功能参数之间的关系
Life (Basel). 2025 Mar 26;15(4):542. doi: 10.3390/life15040542.
6
Integrating Physical Therapy and Virtual Reality to Manage Pain-Related Fear of Movement in Patients With Chronic Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.整合物理治疗与虚拟现实以管理慢性疼痛患者与疼痛相关的运动恐惧:一项随机对照试验。
Cureus. 2025 Feb 24;17(2):e79551. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79551. eCollection 2025 Feb.
7
Feasibility and acceptability of a remote computerized cognitive training employing telehealth in older adults with subjective cognitive complaints.采用远程医疗对有主观认知主诉的老年人进行远程计算机化认知训练的可行性和可接受性。
Digit Health. 2025 Mar 25;11:20552076251324015. doi: 10.1177/20552076251324015. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
8
Effects of a Tele-Prehabilitation Program with Indirect Electrostimulation Compared to Home-Based Exercise in Patients Eligible for Lower Limb Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.与居家锻炼相比,间接电刺激远程康复计划对适合下肢关节置换术患者的影响:一项随机对照试验
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 18;14(4):1356. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041356.
9
Impact of Whole-Body Cryotherapy on Pain, Sleep Quality, Functional Status, and Quality of Life in Multiple Sclerosis: A Comparative Study with Follow-Up.全身冷冻疗法对多发性硬化症患者疼痛、睡眠质量、功能状态和生活质量的影响:一项随访对比研究
J Pers Med. 2025 Jan 26;15(2):46. doi: 10.3390/jpm15020046.
10
Relationship between multiple morbidities and performance on the Timed Up and Go test in elderly patients: a cross-sectional study.老年患者多种疾病与定时起立行走测试表现之间的关系:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 28;15(1):e088950. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088950.

本文引用的文献

1
Diagnoses, intervention strategies, and rates of functional improvement in integrated behavioral health care patients.综合行为健康护理患者的诊断、干预策略及功能改善率。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015 Jun;83(3):590-601. doi: 10.1037/a0038941. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
2
Value-based financially sustainable behavioral health components in patient-centered medical homes.以患者为中心的医疗之家基于价值的财务可持续行为健康组成部分。
Ann Fam Med. 2014 Mar-Apr;12(2):172-5. doi: 10.1370/afm.1619.
3
Comparative effectiveness of exercise and drug interventions on mortality outcomes: metaepidemiological study.运动和药物干预对死亡率结局的比较效果:荟萃流行病学研究。
BMJ. 2013 Oct 1;347:f5577. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f5577.
4
Association of all-cause mortality with overweight and obesity using standard body mass index categories: a systematic review and meta-analysis.采用标准体重指数类别评估全因死亡率与超重和肥胖的关联:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA. 2013 Jan 2;309(1):71-82. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.113905.
5
Early-life origins of adult disease: national longitudinal population-based study of the United States.成年疾病的起源:美国全国纵向人口基础研究。
Am J Public Health. 2011 Dec;101(12):2317-24. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300252. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
6
Social conditions as fundamental causes of health inequalities: theory, evidence, and policy implications.社会条件是健康不平等的根本原因:理论、证据和政策含义。
J Health Soc Behav. 2010;51 Suppl:S28-40. doi: 10.1177/0022146510383498.
7
Psychological perspectives on pathways linking socioeconomic status and physical health.社会经济地位与身体健康之间关联的心理学视角。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:501-30. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.031809.130711.
8
How experience gets under the skin to create gradients in developmental health.经验如何在发育健康中产生梯度。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2010;31:329-47 3p following 347. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.012809.103538.
9
White paper: "walking speed: the sixth vital sign".白皮书:“步行速度:第六生命体征”
J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2009;32(2):46-9.
10
Abbreviated guidelines for scoring the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) in family practice.家庭医疗中累积疾病评定量表(CIRS)评分的简化指南。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Feb;60(2):212. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.12.021. Epub 2006 Nov 13.