Moraes-da-Silva Maria de Fátima Chicarino Varajão, Mendes-de-Almeida Flavya, Abdalla Livia, Merlo Alexandre, Paiva Jonimar Pereira, Labarthe Norma Vollmer
Consultório Veterinário Fino Trato para Cão e Gato, Av. Armando Lombardi 800, loja 100 F, 22640-000, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Medicina Veterinária - Clínica e Reprodução Animal, Faculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Rua Vital Brazil Filho 64, 24230-340, Niterói, RJ, Brazil.
Parasit Vectors. 2016 Jul 22;9(1):407. doi: 10.1186/s13071-016-1697-9.
Dog owners and veterinarians in small animal practices began to waive prevention of canine heartworm disease after heartworm infections seemed to have disappeared in Brazil. After 2013, infection rates rebounded, and an evaluation of the efficacy of chemoprophylactic drugs became necessary. Included in this re-evaluation was the efficacy of selamectin in client-owned dogs residing in a high infection-risk area.
The preventive efficacy of selamectin was evaluated by the topical application of selamectin to 24 client-owned dogs at the recommended rate (minimum of 6 mg/kg) by a veterinarian monthly for 36 months. Blood samples were collected before the first treatment and at the end of the study for testing to detect microfilariae by the modified Knott's test and Dirofilaria immitis antigens using a commercial antigen test. Exposure to risk of heartworm infection was confirmed by the presence of infection in dogs living in low-income communities within a 2 km radius from the homes of dogs in the study. The dogs were managed according to routine practice by the owners within each household throughout the study.
All dogs tested negative by both tests after receiving topical treatment with selamectin monthly for 36 months. Testing of 204 dogs from the communities confirmed the presence of heartworm in the area by detection of microfilariae or D. immitis antigen in 44 dogs (21.6 %).
Topical selamectin was 100 % effective for D. immitis prevention in 24 dogs that received monthly treatments by a veterinarian. Detection of heartworm infections in untreated dogs in the area suggests that clients need to be better informed regarding the prevalence of D. immitis and the importance of maintaining regular preventive treatments.
在巴西犬心丝虫感染似乎已消失后,小动物诊所的犬主和兽医开始不再进行犬心丝虫病的预防。2013年后,感染率反弹,因此有必要评估化学预防药物的疗效。此次重新评估包括赛拉菌素对居住在高感染风险地区的宠物犬的疗效。
兽医每月以推荐剂量(至少6毫克/千克)对24只宠物犬进行赛拉菌素局部用药,持续36个月,以此评估赛拉菌素的预防效果。在首次治疗前和研究结束时采集血样,通过改良的Knott试验检测微丝蚴,并使用商业抗原检测法检测犬恶丝虫抗原。通过研究中犬只住所半径2公里范围内低收入社区的犬只感染情况,确认存在心丝虫感染风险。在整个研究过程中,每户的犬主按照常规做法管理犬只。
24只犬每月接受赛拉菌素局部治疗36个月后,两项检测均呈阴性。对来自这些社区的204只犬进行检测,发现44只犬(21.6%)存在微丝蚴或犬恶丝虫抗原,证实该地区存在心丝虫感染。
兽医每月对24只犬进行局部使用赛拉菌素治疗,预防犬恶丝虫感染的有效率达100%。该地区未治疗犬只的心丝虫感染检测结果表明,需要让犬主更好地了解犬恶丝虫的流行情况以及持续进行常规预防治疗的重要性。