Crane Natania A, Jenkins Lisanne M, Dion Catherine, Meyers Kortni K, Weldon Anne L, Gabriel Laura B, Walker Sara J, Hsu David T, Noll Douglas C, Klumpp Heide, Phan K Luan, Zubieta Jon-Kar, Langenecker Scott A
Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, MBNI, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Depress Anxiety. 2016 Oct;33(10):967-977. doi: 10.1002/da.22541. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and anxiety disorders often co-occur, with poorer treatment response and long-term outcomes. However, little is known about the shared and distinct neural mechanisms of comorbid MDD and anxiety (MDD+Anx). This study examined how MDD and MDD+Anx differentially impact cognitive control.
Eighteen MDD, 29 MDD+Anx, and 54 healthy controls (HC) completed the Parametric Go/No-Go (PGNG) during fMRI, including Target, Commission, and Rejection trials.
MDD+Anx had more activation in the anterior dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, hippocampus, and caudate during Rejections, and inferior parietal lobule during correct Targets than MDD and HC. During Rejections HC had greater activation in a number of cognitive control regions compared to MDD; in the posterior cingulate compared to MDD+Anx; and in the fusiform gyrus compared to all MDD. During Commissions HC had greater activation in the right inferior frontal gyrus than all MDD. MDD had more activation in the mid-cingulate, inferior parietal lobule, and superior temporal gyrus than MDD+Anx during Commissions.
Despite similar performance, MDD and MDD+Anx showed distinct differences in neural mechanisms of cognitive control in relation to each other, as well as some shared differences in relation to HC. The results were consistent with our hypothesis of hypervigilance in MDD+Anx within the cognitive control network, but inconsistent with our hypothesis that there would be greater engagement of salience and emotion network regions. Comorbidity of depression and anxiety may cause increased heterogeneity in study samples, requiring further specificity in detection and measurement of intermediate phenotypes and treatment Targets.
重度抑郁症(MDD)和焦虑症常同时出现,治疗反应和长期预后较差。然而,关于共病的MDD和焦虑症(MDD+Anx)的共同和不同神经机制知之甚少。本研究考察了MDD和MDD+Anx如何不同地影响认知控制。
18名MDD患者、29名MDD+Anx患者和54名健康对照者(HC)在功能磁共振成像(fMRI)期间完成了参数化的“是/否”任务(PGNG),包括目标、执行和拒绝试验。
与MDD和HC相比,MDD+Anx在拒绝试验期间,前背外侧前额叶皮质、海马体和尾状核的激活更多,在正确目标试验期间顶下小叶的激活更多。在拒绝试验期间,与MDD相比,HC在多个认知控制区域的激活更强;与MDD+Anx相比,在后扣带回的激活更强;与所有MDD患者相比,在梭状回的激活更强。在执行试验期间,与所有MDD患者相比,HC在右侧额下回的激活更强。在执行试验期间,MDD在扣带中部、顶下小叶和颞上回的激活比MDD+Anx更多。
尽管表现相似,但MDD和MDD+Anx在认知控制的神经机制上相互之间存在明显差异,与HC相比也有一些共同差异。结果与我们关于MDD+Anx在认知控制网络中过度警觉的假设一致,但与我们关于显著性和情感网络区域会有更大参与度的假设不一致。抑郁和焦虑的共病可能导致研究样本的异质性增加,需要在中间表型和治疗靶点的检测和测量上进一步细化。