Suppr超能文献

儿童癌症幸存者父母使用的苦恼温度计(DT)和埃德蒙顿症状评估系统修订版(ESAS-r)的稳定性和可重复性

Stability and Repeatability of the Distress Thermometer (DT) and the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-Revised (ESAS-r) with Parents of Childhood Cancer Survivors.

作者信息

Leclair Tatsiana, Carret Anne-Sophie, Samson Yvan, Sultan Serge

机构信息

Department of Hematology-Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Sainte-Justine, 3175, Chemin de la Côte Sainte-Catherine, Montréal, Québec, H3T 1C5, Canada.

Department of Psychology, Université de Montréal, Pavillon Marie-Victorin, 90, avenue Vincent d'Indy, Montréal, Québec, H2V 2S9, Canada.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2016 Jul 25;11(7):e0159773. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159773. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Parents report psychological distress in association with their child's cancer. Reliable tools are needed to screen parental distress over the cancer trajectory. This study aimed to estimate the stability and repeatability of the Distress Thermometer (DT) and the Depression and Anxiety items of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-revised (ESAS-r-D; -A) in parents of children diagnosed with cancer.

METHODS

Fifty parents (28 mothers, median age = 44) of clinically stable survivors of childhood solid and brain tumours completed questionnaires about their own distress (DT, ESAS-r-D; -A, Brief Symptom Inventory-18: BSI-18, Patient Health Questionnaire-9: PHQ-9, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7: GAD-7) and their children's quality of life (QoL; Peds Quality of Life: PedsQL) twice, with a month interval between the two assessments. At retest, parents also evaluated life events that occurred between the two time points. Hierarchical regressions explored moderators for the temporal stability of test measures.

RESULTS

Stability estimates were ICC = .78 for the DT, .55 for the ESAS-r-D, and .47 for the ESAS-r-A. Caseness agreement between test and retest was substantial for the DT, fair for the ESAS-r-D, and slight for the ESAS-r-A. Repeatability analyses indicated that the error range for the DT was more than 2 pts below/above actual measurement, whereas it was more than 3 pts for the ESAS-r-A, and 2.5 for the ESAS-r-D. Instability of the DT could be explained by changes in children's physical QoL, but not by other components of QoL or life events. No moderators of stability could be identified for the ESAS-r items.

CONCLUSIONS

The DT appears to be a fairly stable measure when the respondent's condition is stable yet with a relatively wide error range. Fluctuations in distress-related constructs may affect the temporal stability of the DT. The lower stability of ESAS-r items may result from shorter time-lapse instructions resulting in a greater sensitivity to change. Findings support future research on the DT as a reliable instrument in caregivers.

摘要

目的

家长报告称,孩子患癌症会让他们产生心理困扰。需要可靠的工具来筛查家长在孩子患癌病程中的困扰情况。本研究旨在评估苦恼温度计(DT)以及修订版埃德蒙顿症状评估系统中的抑郁和焦虑项目(ESAS-r-D;-A)在确诊患有癌症儿童的家长中的稳定性和可重复性。

方法

50名家长(28名母亲,中位年龄 = 44岁),其孩子为临床病情稳定的儿童实体瘤和脑肿瘤幸存者,他们分两次完成了关于自身苦恼情况的问卷(DT、ESAS-r-D;-A、简明症状量表-18:BSI-18、患者健康问卷-9:PHQ-9、广泛性焦虑障碍量表-7:GAD-7)以及孩子的生活质量问卷(QoL;儿童生活质量量表:PedsQL),两次评估间隔一个月。在复测时,家长还评估了两个时间点之间发生的生活事件。分层回归分析探讨了测试指标时间稳定性的调节因素。

结果

DT的稳定性估计值为组内相关系数(ICC) = 0.78,ESAS-r-D为0.55,ESAS-r-A为0.47。DT的测试与复测之间的病例一致性较高,ESAS-r-D为中等,ESAS-r-A为较低。可重复性分析表明,DT的误差范围比实际测量值低/高2分以上,而ESAS-r-A为3分以上,ESAS-r-D为2.5分。DT的不稳定性可以用孩子身体生活质量的变化来解释,但不能用生活质量的其他组成部分或生活事件来解释。对于ESAS-r项目,未发现稳定性的调节因素。

结论

当受访者状况稳定时,DT似乎是一个相当稳定的测量工具,但误差范围相对较宽。与苦恼相关的结构波动可能会影响DT的时间稳定性。ESAS-r项目较低的稳定性可能是由于时间间隔较短导致对变化更敏感。研究结果支持未来将DT作为护理人员可靠工具的研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fd1/4959708/1437cc2f7f81/pone.0159773.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验