• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于皮肤致敏危害预测的分类树共识

Consensus of classification trees for skin sensitisation hazard prediction.

作者信息

Asturiol D, Casati S, Worth A

机构信息

Joint Research Centre, Via Enrico Fermi 2749, Ispra 21027, VA, Italy.

Joint Research Centre, Via Enrico Fermi 2749, Ispra 21027, VA, Italy.

出版信息

Toxicol In Vitro. 2016 Oct;36:197-209. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2016.07.014. Epub 2016 Jul 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.tiv.2016.07.014
PMID:27458072
Abstract

Since March 2013, it is no longer possible to market in the European Union (EU) cosmetics containing new ingredients tested on animals. Although several in silico alternatives are available and achievements have been made in the development and regulatory adoption of skin sensitisation non-animal tests, there is not yet a generally accepted approach for skin sensitisation assessment that would fully substitute the need for animal testing. The aim of this work was to build a defined approach (i.e. a predictive model based on readouts from various information sources that uses a fixed procedure for generating a prediction) for skin sensitisation hazard prediction (sensitiser/non-sensitiser) using Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA) results as reference classifications. To derive the model, we built a dataset with high quality data from in chemico (DPRA) and in vitro (KeratinoSens™ and h-CLAT) methods, and it was complemented with predictions from several software packages. The modelling exercise showed that skin sensitisation hazard was better predicted by classification trees based on in silico predictions. The defined approach consists of a consensus of two classification trees that are based on descriptors that account for protein reactivity and structural features. The model showed an accuracy of 0.93, sensitivity of 0.98, and specificity of 0.85 for 269 chemicals. In addition, the defined approach provides a measure of confidence associated to the prediction.

摘要

自2013年3月起,在欧盟(EU)销售含有经动物试验的新成分的化妆品已不再可行。尽管有几种计算机模拟替代方法可用,并且在皮肤致敏非动物试验的开发和监管采用方面已取得进展,但尚未有能完全替代动物试验需求的普遍接受的皮肤致敏评估方法。这项工作的目的是建立一种明确的方法(即基于来自各种信息源读数的预测模型,该模型使用固定程序生成预测),以使用局部淋巴结试验(LLNA)结果作为参考分类来预测皮肤致敏危害(致敏剂/非致敏剂)。为了推导该模型,我们构建了一个数据集,其中包含来自化学方法(DPRA)和体外方法(KeratinoSens™和h-CLAT)的高质量数据,并用几个软件包的预测结果进行了补充。建模结果表明,基于计算机模拟预测的分类树能更好地预测皮肤致敏危害。该明确方法由基于描述符的两个分类树的共识组成,这些描述符考虑了蛋白质反应性和结构特征。对于269种化学物质,该模型的准确率为0.93,灵敏度为0.98,特异性为0.85。此外,该明确方法还提供了与预测相关的置信度度量。

相似文献

1
Consensus of classification trees for skin sensitisation hazard prediction.用于皮肤致敏危害预测的分类树共识
Toxicol In Vitro. 2016 Oct;36:197-209. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2016.07.014. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
2
A defined approach for predicting skin sensitisation hazard and potency based on the guided integration of in silico, in chemico and in vitro data using exclusion criteria.一种基于使用排除标准对计算机模拟、化学实验和体外数据进行引导整合来预测皮肤致敏危害和效力的明确方法。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2019 Feb;101:35-47. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.11.001. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
3
Analysis of the Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA) variability for assessing the prediction of skin sensitisation potential and potency of chemicals with non-animal approaches.采用非动物方法评估化学物质皮肤致敏潜力和强度预测的局部淋巴结试验(LLNA)变异性分析。
Toxicol In Vitro. 2016 Aug;34:220-228. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2016.04.008. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
4
Binary test battery with KeratinoSens™ and h-CLAT as part of a bottom-up approach for skin sensitization hazard prediction.以KeratinoSens™和h-CLAT作为自下而上的皮肤致敏危害预测方法一部分的二元测试组合。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2017 Aug;88:118-124. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.06.002. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
5
Assessment of a defined approach based on a stacking prediction model to identify skin sensitization hazard.基于堆叠预测模型的定义方法评估,以识别皮肤致敏危害。
Toxicol In Vitro. 2019 Oct;60:134-143. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2019.05.008. Epub 2019 May 14.
6
Skin sensitisation testing in practice: Applying a stacking meta model to cosmetic ingredients.实际中的皮肤致敏性测试:将堆叠元模型应用于化妆品成分。
Toxicol In Vitro. 2020 Aug;66:104831. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2020.104831. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
7
Evaluation of combinations of in vitro sensitization test descriptors for the artificial neural network-based risk assessment model of skin sensitization.基于人工神经网络的皮肤致敏风险评估模型的体外致敏试验描述符组合评估
J Appl Toxicol. 2015 Nov;35(11):1333-47. doi: 10.1002/jat.3105. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
8
Application of a systems biology approach to skin allergy risk assessment.系统生物学方法在皮肤过敏风险评估中的应用。
Altern Lab Anim. 2008 Nov;36(5):521-56. doi: 10.1177/026119290803600510.
9
Can currently available non-animal methods detect pre and pro-haptens relevant for skin sensitization?目前可用的非动物方法能否检测出与皮肤致敏相关的前体半抗原和原半抗原?
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2016 Dec;82:147-155. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2016.08.007. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
10
Predicting skin sensitisation using a decision tree integrated testing strategy with an in silico model and in chemico/in vitro assays.使用结合计算机模拟模型与化学/体外试验的决策树综合测试策略预测皮肤致敏性。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2016 Apr;76:30-8. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2016.01.009. Epub 2016 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Application of Virtual Drug Study to New Drug Research and Development: Challenges and Opportunity.虚拟药物研究在新药研发中的应用:挑战与机遇。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2024 Sep;63(9):1239-1249. doi: 10.1007/s40262-024-01416-w. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
2
Comparing and contrasting the coverage of publicly available structural alerts for protein binding.比较和对比公开可用的蛋白质结合结构警报的覆盖范围。
Comput Toxicol. 2019 Nov 1;12:1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.comtox.2019.100100.
3
Alvascience: A New Software Suite for the QSAR Workflow Applied to the Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability.
Alvascience:一套应用于血脑屏障渗透性的 QSAR 工作流程的全新软件套件。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Oct 25;23(21):12882. doi: 10.3390/ijms232112882.
4
Evaluating Confidence in Toxicity Assessments Based on Experimental Data and Predictions.基于实验数据和预测评估毒性评估的可信度。
Comput Toxicol. 2022 Feb;21. doi: 10.1016/j.comtox.2021.100204. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
5
Predicting the Skin Sensitization Potential of Small Molecules with Machine Learning Models Trained on Biologically Meaningful Descriptors.利用基于具有生物学意义描述符训练的机器学习模型预测小分子的皮肤致敏潜力。
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021 Aug 11;14(8):790. doi: 10.3390/ph14080790.
6
Prediction of Skin Sensitization: ?皮肤致敏预测:?
Front Pharmacol. 2021 May 4;12:655771. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.655771. eCollection 2021.
7
Consensus versus Individual QSARs in Classification: Comparison on a Large-Scale Case Study.共识与个体定量构效关系在分类中的比较:基于大规模案例研究的比较。
J Chem Inf Model. 2020 Mar 23;60(3):1215-1223. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b01057. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
8
Skin Sensitization Testing-What's Next?皮肤致敏试验——下一步是什么?
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Feb 4;20(3):666. doi: 10.3390/ijms20030666.
9
Tri-culture system for pro-hapten sensitizer identification and potency classification.用于前体半抗原致敏剂鉴定和效力分类的三培养系统。
Technology (Singap World Sci). 2018 Jun;6(2):67-74. doi: 10.1142/S233954781850005X. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
10
Non-animal methods to predict skin sensitization (II): an assessment of defined approaches .非动物方法预测皮肤致敏性(二):已定义方法的评估。
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2018 May;48(5):359-374. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2018.1429386. Epub 2018 Feb 23.