Qi Ling, Ding Lijuan, Wang Shuran, Zhong Yue, Zhao Donghai, Gao Ling, Wang Weiyao, Lv Peng, Xu Ye, Wang Shudong
Basic Medical College, Jilin Medical University, Jilin, China.
Department of Radiation Oncology, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Oncotarget. 2016 Oct 18;7(42):69002-69013. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.10763.
Different chemotherapy drugs are generally introduced in clinical practices combining with therapy for glioma treatment. However, these chemotherapy drugs have rarely been compared with each other and the optimum drug still remains to be proved. In this research, medical databases were consulted, PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library included. As primary outcomes, hazard ratio (HR) of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) with their corresponding 95% credential intervals (CrI) were reported. A network meta-analysis was conducted; the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was utilized for treatment rank and a cluster analysis based on SUCRA values was performed. This research includes 14 trials with 3,681 subjects and eight interventions. In terms of network meta-analysis, placebo was proved to be inferior to the combination of temozolomide (TMZ), nimustine (ACNU) and cisplatin (CDDP). Also, bevacizumab (BEV) in conjunction with TMZ were significantly more effective than placebo with an HR of 0.40. The estimated probabilities from SUCRA verified the above outcomes, confirming that the combination of TMZ, ACNU and CDDP exhibited the highest ranking probability of 0.889 with respect to OS, while BEV in combination with TMZ - with a probability of 0.772 - ranked the first place with respect to PFS. According to the results of this network meta-analysis, the combination of (1) TMZ, ACNU and CDDP; (2) BEV in combination with TMZ and (3) cilengitide in combination with TMZ, are considered as the preferable choices of chemotherapy drugs for glioma treatment.
在胶质瘤治疗中,不同的化疗药物通常在临床实践中与其他疗法联合使用。然而,这些化疗药物之间很少相互比较,最佳药物仍有待确定。在本研究中,查阅了医学数据库,包括PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆。作为主要结果,报告了总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)的风险比(HR)及其相应的95%可信区间(CrI)。进行了网络荟萃分析;利用累积排名曲线下面积(SUCRA)进行治疗排名,并基于SUCRA值进行聚类分析。本研究包括14项试验,共3681名受试者和8种干预措施。在网络荟萃分析方面,安慰剂被证明不如替莫唑胺(TMZ)、尼莫司汀(ACNU)和顺铂(CDDP)的联合使用。此外,贝伐单抗(BEV)联合TMZ比安慰剂显著更有效,HR为0.40。SUCRA的估计概率验证了上述结果,证实TMZ、ACNU和CDDP的联合使用在OS方面表现出最高的排名概率,为0.889,而BEV联合TMZ在PFS方面以0.772的概率排名第一。根据该网络荟萃分析的结果,(1)TMZ、ACNU和CDDP的联合使用;(2)BEV联合TMZ;(3)西仑吉肽联合TMZ,被认为是胶质瘤治疗化疗药物的优选选择。