Clinical Criteria to Identify Patients With Sepsis.
作者信息
Makam Anil N, Nguyen Oanh Kieu
机构信息
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.
出版信息
JAMA. 2016 Jul 26;316(4):453. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.6407.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Clinical Criteria to Identify Patients With Sepsis.识别脓毒症患者的临床标准。
JAMA. 2016 Jul 26;316(4):453. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.6407.
2
Clinical Criteria to Identify Patients With Sepsis.识别脓毒症患者的临床标准。
JAMA. 2016 Jul 26;316(4):453-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.6410.
3
Clinical Criteria to Identify Patients With Sepsis--Reply.识别脓毒症患者的临床标准——回复
JAMA. 2016 Jul 26;316(4):454. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.6413.
4
Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).脓毒症临床标准评估：针对《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义》（Sepsis-3）。
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):762-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0288.
5
Logistic Regression: Relating Patient Characteristics to Outcomes.逻辑回归：将患者特征与预后相关联。
JAMA. 2016 Aug 2;316(5):533-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.7653.
6
Sepsis patients in the emergency department: stratification using the Clinical Impression Score, Predisposition, Infection, Response and Organ dysfunction score or quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score?急诊科脓毒症患者：使用临床印象评分、易感性、感染、反应和器官功能障碍评分或快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分进行分层？
Eur J Emerg Med. 2018 Oct;25(5):328-334. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000460.
7
Low sensitivity of qSOFA, SIRS criteria and sepsis definition to identify infected patients at risk of complication in the prehospital setting and at the emergency department triage.qSOFA、SIRS 标准和脓毒症定义对识别院前环境和急诊科分诊中感染风险患者的并发症的敏感性较低。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Nov 3;25(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0449-y.
8
Adaptation and Validation of a Pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score and Evaluation of the Sepsis-3 Definitions in Critically Ill Children.儿童序贯器官衰竭评估评分的适应性与验证及危重症儿童中脓毒症-3定义的评估
JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Oct 2;171(10):e172352. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.2352.
9
Calculated decisions: qSOFA (quick SOFA) score for sepsis.计算得出的决策：用于脓毒症的qSOFA（快速序贯器官衰竭评估）评分
Emerg Med Pract. 2018 Oct 1;20(Suppl 10):CD2-CD4.
10
Can the Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction-2 Score on Day 1 Be Used in Clinical Criteria for Sepsis in Children?第1天的儿童逻辑器官功能障碍-2评分能否用于儿童脓毒症的临床诊断标准？
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017 Aug;18(8):758-763. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001182.
引用本文的文献
1
Investigating the renoprotective effect of C21 in male mice with sepsis via modulation of p-AKT/PI3K expression.研究 C21 通过调节 p-AKT/PI3K 表达对脓毒症雄性小鼠的肾保护作用。
J Med Life. 2023 Feb;16(2):203-209. doi: 10.25122/jml-2022-0299.
2
The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 (J-SSCG 2020).《2020年日本脓毒症及脓毒性休克管理临床实践指南》（J-SSCG 2020）
Acute Med Surg. 2021 Aug 26;8(1):e659. doi: 10.1002/ams2.659. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
3
The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 (J-SSCG 2020).《2020年日本脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理临床实践指南》（J-SSCG 2020）
J Intensive Care. 2021 Aug 25;9(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s40560-021-00555-7.
4
Impact of different consensus definition criteria on sepsis diagnosis in a cohort of critically ill patients-Insights from a new mathematical probabilistic approach to mortality-based validation of sepsis criteria.不同共识定义标准对危重症患者脓毒症诊断的影响——基于新的数学概率方法对基于死亡率的脓毒症标准进行验证的见解。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 8;15(9):e0238548. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238548. eCollection 2020.
5
Implementation of the Sepsis-3 definition in German university intensive care units : A survey.德国大学重症监护病房中脓毒症-3定义的实施情况：一项调查。
Anaesthesist. 2018 Sep;67(9):647-653. doi: 10.1007/s00101-018-0465-y. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
6
Reconsidering lactate as a sepsis risk biomarker.重新审视乳酸作为脓毒症风险生物标志物的作用。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 3;12(10):e0185320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185320. eCollection 2017.
7
[New Sepsis-3 definition : Do we have to treat sepsis before we can diagnose it from now on?].[新的脓毒症-3定义：从现在起，我们必须在诊断脓毒症之前就进行治疗吗？]
Anaesthesist. 2017 Aug;66(8):614-621. doi: 10.1007/s00101-017-0316-2.
8
Understanding circulatory failure in sepsis.了解脓毒症中的循环衰竭。
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Dec;42(12):2077-2079. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4514-1. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
本文引用的文献
1
Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).脓毒症临床标准评估：针对《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义》（Sepsis-3）。
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):762-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0288.
2
Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for septic shock.早期目标导向性复苏治疗脓毒性休克的试验。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 2;372(14):1301-11. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1500896. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
3
Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease prevention: a comparison between the third adult treatment panel and the new 2013 Treatment of Blood Cholesterol Guidelines.动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病的预防：第三次成人治疗小组与2013年新的《血液胆固醇治疗指南》之比较
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014 Sep;7(5):778-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001139. Epub 2014 Aug 5.
4
Comparison of application of the ACC/AHA guidelines, Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines, and European Society of Cardiology guidelines for cardiovascular disease prevention in a European cohort.比较 ACC/AHA 指南、成人治疗专家组 III 指南和欧洲心脏病学会指南在欧洲队列中用于心血管疾病预防的应用。
JAMA. 2014 Apr 9;311(14):1416-23. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.2632.
5
Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction.风险预测中受试者工作特征曲线的应用与误用
Circulation. 2007 Feb 20;115(7):928-35. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.672402.
Zotero 插件