O'Reilly Sharleen L, Dunbar James A, Versace Vincent, Janus Edward, Best James D, Carter Rob, Oats Jeremy J N, Skinner Timothy, Ackland Michael, Phillips Paddy A, Ebeling Peter R, Reynolds John, Shih Sophy T F, Hagger Virginia, Coates Michael, Wildey Carol
Institute of Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.
Centre for Population Health Research, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.
PLoS Med. 2016 Jul 26;13(7):e1002092. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002092. eCollection 2016 Jul.
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is an increasingly prevalent risk factor for type 2 diabetes. We evaluated the effectiveness of a group-based lifestyle modification program in mothers with prior GDM within their first postnatal year.
In this study, 573 women were randomised to either the intervention (n = 284) or usual care (n = 289). At baseline, 10% had impaired glucose tolerance and 2% impaired fasting glucose. The diabetes prevention intervention comprised one individual session, five group sessions, and two telephone sessions. Primary outcomes were changes in diabetes risk factors (weight, waist circumference, and fasting blood glucose), and secondary outcomes included achievement of lifestyle modification goals and changes in depression score and cardiovascular disease risk factors. The mean changes (intention-to-treat [ITT] analysis) over 12 mo were as follows: -0.23 kg body weight in intervention group (95% CI -0.89, 0.43) compared with +0.72 kg in usual care group (95% CI 0.09, 1.35) (change difference -0.95 kg, 95% CI -1.87, -0.04; group by treatment interaction p = 0.04); -2.24 cm waist measurement in intervention group (95% CI -3.01, -1.42) compared with -1.74 cm in usual care group (95% CI -2.52, -0.96) (change difference -0.50 cm, 95% CI -1.63, 0.63; group by treatment interaction p = 0.389); and +0.18 mmol/l fasting blood glucose in intervention group (95% CI 0.11, 0.24) compared with +0.22 mmol/l in usual care group (95% CI 0.16, 0.29) (change difference -0.05 mmol/l, 95% CI -0.14, 0.05; group by treatment interaction p = 0.331). Only 10% of women attended all sessions, 53% attended one individual and at least one group session, and 34% attended no sessions. Loss to follow-up was 27% and 21% for the intervention and control groups, respectively, primarily due to subsequent pregnancies. Study limitations include low exposure to the full intervention and glucose metabolism profiles being near normal at baseline.
Although a 1-kg weight difference has the potential to be significant for reducing diabetes risk, the level of engagement during the first postnatal year was low. Further research is needed to improve engagement, including participant involvement in study design; it is potentially more effective to implement annual diabetes screening until women develop prediabetes before offering an intervention.
Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12610000338066.
妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)是2型糖尿病日益普遍的危险因素。我们评估了一项基于群体的生活方式改变计划对产后第一年内曾患GDM的母亲的有效性。
在本研究中,573名女性被随机分为干预组(n = 284)或常规护理组(n = 289)。基线时,10%的女性糖耐量受损,2%的女性空腹血糖受损。糖尿病预防干预包括一次个体咨询、五次小组咨询和两次电话咨询。主要结局是糖尿病危险因素(体重、腰围和空腹血糖)的变化,次要结局包括生活方式改变目标的达成情况以及抑郁评分和心血管疾病危险因素的变化。12个月内的平均变化(意向性分析[ITT])如下:干预组体重变化为 -0.23 kg(95% CI -0.89, 0.43),而常规护理组为 +0.72 kg(95% CI 0.09, 1.35)(变化差值 -0.95 kg,95% CI -1.87, -0.04;组间交互作用p = 0.04);干预组腰围变化为 -2.24 cm(95% CI -3.01, -1.42),常规护理组为 -1.74 cm(95% CI -2.52, -0.96)(变化差值 -0.50 cm,95% CI -1.63, 0.63;组间交互作用p = 0.389);干预组空腹血糖变化为 +0.18 mmol/l(95% CI 0.11, 0.24),常规护理组为 +0.22 mmol/l(95% CI 0.16, 0.29)(变化差值 -0.05 mmol/l,95% CI -0.14, 0.05;组间交互作用p = 0.331)。只有10%的女性参加了所有咨询,53%的女性参加了一次个体咨询和至少一次小组咨询,34%的女性未参加任何咨询。干预组和对照组的失访率分别为27%和21%,主要原因是后续怀孕。研究局限性包括对完整干预的低暴露率以及基线时糖代谢谱接近正常。
尽管1 kg的体重差异对降低糖尿病风险可能具有显著意义,但产后第一年内的参与度较低。需要进一步研究以提高参与度,包括让参与者参与研究设计;在女性发展为糖尿病前期之前提供干预措施之前,实施年度糖尿病筛查可能更有效。
澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心ACTRN12610000338066。