Parker Oliver Debra, Demiris George, Washington Karla, Kruse Robin L, Petroski Greg
1 Curtis W. and Ann H. Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
2 Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Systems, School of Nursing & Biomedical and Health Informatics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2017 Nov;34(9):849-859. doi: 10.1177/1049909116661816. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
Untrained family caregivers struggle with complicated medical management regimens for hospice patients. An intervention was tested to improve caregiver's perception of pain management and patient's pain.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The intervention was tested with a 2-group (usual care vs intervention) randomized controlled trial using parallel mixed-methods analysis of 446 caregivers in 3 Midwestern hospice programs representing rural and urban settings.
Web conferencing or telephones were used to connect caregivers with the hospice care team during care plan meetings.
Caregiver's perceptions of pain management were the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included caregiver quality of life, patient's pain, and anxiety. Video recordings, field notes, and caregiver and staff interviews provided qualitative data.
The overall perception of pain management was not changed by the participation in hospice team meetings. Perceptions of fatalism improved for intervention participants, and the intervention participants perceived their patients' pain was better controlled than those in the control group. The intervention was found to be feasible to deliver in rural areas. Caregiver's anxiety and patient's pain were correlated ( r = .18; P = .003), and subanalysis indicated that caregivers of patients with cancer may benefit more from the intervention than other hospice caregivers. Qualitative analyses provided understanding of caregiver's perceptions of pain, cost, and facilitators and barriers to routine involvement of family in care plan meetings. Limitations and Conclusion: The hospice philosophy is supportive of caregiver involvement in care planning, and technology makes this feasible; the intervention needs modification to become translational as well as additional measurement to assess effectiveness. Caregiver education and emotional support should occur outside the meeting, and a strong leader should facilitate the meeting to control efficiency. Finally, the intervention may benefit caregivers of patients with cancer more than others.
未经培训的家庭护理人员在为临终关怀患者进行复杂的医疗管理方案时面临困难。一项干预措施经过测试,旨在改善护理人员对疼痛管理的认知以及患者的疼痛状况。
设计、地点与参与者:该干预措施通过两组(常规护理与干预组)随机对照试验进行测试,采用平行混合方法分析了来自中西部3个临终关怀项目的446名护理人员,这些项目涵盖农村和城市地区。
在护理计划会议期间,使用网络会议或电话将护理人员与临终关怀护理团队联系起来。
护理人员对疼痛管理的认知是主要结果。次要结果包括护理人员的生活质量、患者的疼痛和焦虑。视频记录、实地笔记以及护理人员和工作人员访谈提供了定性数据。
参与临终关怀团队会议并未改变对疼痛管理的总体认知。干预组参与者的宿命论认知有所改善,且干预组参与者认为他们患者的疼痛比对照组得到了更好的控制。该干预措施在农村地区实施是可行的。护理人员的焦虑与患者的疼痛相关(r = 0.18;P = 0.003),亚分析表明癌症患者的护理人员可能比其他临终关怀护理人员从干预中获益更多。定性分析有助于理解护理人员对疼痛、成本以及家庭常规参与护理计划会议的促进因素和障碍的认知。局限性与结论:临终关怀理念支持护理人员参与护理计划制定,而技术使其成为可能;该干预措施需要改进以实现转化,同时需要额外的测量来评估有效性。护理人员教育和情感支持应在会议之外进行,并且需要一位强有力的领导者来促进会议以控制效率。最后,该干预措施可能使癌症患者的护理人员比其他人获益更多。