Suppr超能文献

一项阶梯楔形整群随机试验,以评估多地点家庭照顾者技能培训项目的有效性。

A stepped wedge cluster randomized trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a multisite family caregiver skills training program.

作者信息

Van Houtven Courtney Harold, Coffman Cynthia J, Decosimo Kasey, Grubber Janet M, Dadolf Joshua, Sullivan Caitlin, Tucker Matthew, Bruening Rebecca, Sperber Nina R, Stechuchak Karen M, Shepherd-Banigan Megan, Boucher Nathan, Ma Jessica E, Kaufman Brystana G, Colón-Emeric Cathleen S, Jackson George L, Damush Teresa M, Christensen Leah, Wang Virginia, Allen Kelli D, Hastings Susan N

机构信息

Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec;59(6):e14326. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14326. Epub 2024 Aug 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effects of an evidence-based family caregiver training program (implementation of Helping Invested Families Improve Veteran Experiences Study [iHI-FIVES]) in the Veterans Affairs healthcare system on Veteran days not at home and family caregiver well-being.

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING

Participants included Veterans referred to home- and community-based services with an identified caregiver across 8 medical centers and confirmed family caregivers of eligible Veterans.

STUDY DESIGN

In a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial, sites were randomized to a 6-month time interval for starting iHI-FIVES and received standardized implementation support. The primary outcome, number of Veteran "days not at home," and secondary outcomes, changes over 3 months in measures of caregiver well-being, were compared between pre- and post-iHI-FIVES intervals using generalized linear models including covariates.

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Patient data were extracted from the electronic health record. Caregiver data were collected from 2 telephone-based surveys.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Overall, n = 898 eligible Veterans were identified across pre-iHI-FIVES (n = 327) and post-iHI-FIVES intervals (n = 571). Just under one fifth (17%) of Veterans in post-iHI-FIVES intervals had a caregiver enroll in iHI-FIVES. Veteran and caregiver demographics in pre-iHI-FIVES intervals were similar to those in post-iHI-FIVES intervals. In adjusted models, the estimated rate of days not at home over 6-months was 42% lower (rate ratio = 0.58 [95% confidence interval: 0.31-1.09; p = 0.09]) post-iHI-FIVES compared with pre-iHI-FIVES. The estimated mean days not at home over a 6-month period was 13.0 days pre-iHI-FIVES and 7.5 post-iHI-FIVES. There were no differences between pre- and post-iHI-FIVES in change over 3 months in caregiver well-being measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Reducing days not at home is consistent with effectiveness because more time at home increases quality of life. In this study, after adjusting for Veteran characteristics, we did not find evidence that implementation of a caregiver training program yielded a reduction in Veteran's days not at home.

摘要

目的

评估退伍军人事务医疗系统中基于证据的家庭照顾者培训项目(“帮助投入家庭改善退伍军人体验研究”[iHI-FIVES]的实施情况)对退伍军人不在家天数及家庭照顾者幸福感的影响。

数据来源与研究背景

参与者包括被转介至家庭和社区服务且有确定照顾者的退伍军人,来自8个医疗中心,以及符合条件退伍军人的经确认的家庭照顾者。

研究设计

在一项阶梯式楔形整群随机试验中,各地点被随机分配到一个6个月的时间间隔来启动iHI-FIVES,并获得标准化的实施支持。使用包括协变量的广义线性模型,比较iHI-FIVES实施前和实施后的主要结局(退伍军人“不在家天数”)以及次要结局(照顾者幸福感指标在3个月内的变化)。

数据收集/提取方法:患者数据从电子健康记录中提取。照顾者数据通过2次电话调查收集。

主要发现

总体而言,在iHI-FIVES实施前(n = 327)和实施后(n = 571)的时间段内,共识别出898名符合条件的退伍军人。在iHI-FIVES实施后的时间段内,不到五分之一(17%)的退伍军人有照顾者参加了iHI-FIVES。iHI-FIVES实施前时间段内的退伍军人和照顾者人口统计学特征与实施后时间段内相似。在调整模型中,与iHI-FIVES实施前相比,iHI-FIVES实施后6个月内不在家天数的估计发生率降低了42%(发生率比 = 0.58 [95%置信区间:0.31 - 1.09;p = 0.09])。iHI-FIVES实施前6个月期间不在家的估计平均天数为13.0天,实施后为7.5天。在照顾者幸福感指标3个月内的变化方面,iHI-FIVES实施前后没有差异。

结论

减少不在家天数与有效性相符,因为在家时间增加可提高生活质量。在本研究中,在对退伍军人特征进行调整后,我们没有发现证据表明实施照顾者培训项目能减少退伍军人不在家的天数。

相似文献

4
Home-based educational interventions for children with asthma.针对哮喘儿童的家庭式教育干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Feb 6;2(2):CD008469. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008469.pub3.
6
Nutritional interventions for survivors of childhood cancer.儿童癌症幸存者的营养干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 22;2016(8):CD009678. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009678.pub2.
8
Incentives for preventing smoking in children and adolescents.预防儿童和青少年吸烟的激励措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 6;6(6):CD008645. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008645.pub3.
10
Interventions for preventing abuse in the elderly.预防老年人受虐待的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 16;2016(8):CD010321. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010321.pub2.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验