Abessa Teklu Gemechu, Worku Berhanu Nigussie, Kibebew Mekitie Wondafrash, Valy Jan, Lemmens Johan, Thijs Herbert, Yimer Wondwosen Kasahun, Kolsteren Patrick, Granitzer Marita
Department of Psychology, College of Behavioral Sciences and Education, Jimma University, Jimma, Oromia, Ethiopia.
REVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Biomedical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Hasselt, Hasselt, Belgium.
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jul 28;16:652. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3288-2.
Due to lack of culturally relevant assessment tools, little is known about children's developmental profiles in low income settings such as Ethiopia. The objective of this study was to adapt and standardize the Denver II for assessing child development in Jimma Zone, South West Ethiopia.
Culture-specific test items in Denver II were modified. After translation into two local languages, all test items were piloted and fine-tuned. Using 1597 healthy children 4 days to 70.6 months of age, the 25, 50, 75 and 90 % passing ages were determined for each test item as milestones. Milestones attainment on the adapted version and the Denver II were compared on the 90 % passing age. Reliability of the adapted tool was examined.
A total of 36 (28.8 %) test items, mostly from personal social domain, were adapted. Milestones attainment ages on the two versions differed significantly on 42 (34 %) test items. The adapted tool has an excellent inter-rater on 123 (98 %) items and substantial to excellent test-retest reliability on 119 (91 %) items.
A Western developmental assessment tool can be adapted reliably for use in low-income settings. Age differences in attaining milestones indicate a correct estimation of child development requires a population-specific standard.
由于缺乏与文化相关的评估工具,对于埃塞俄比亚等低收入地区儿童的发育情况知之甚少。本研究的目的是对丹佛发育筛查测验第二版(Denver II)进行改编和标准化,以评估埃塞俄比亚西南部吉马地区儿童的发育情况。
对Denver II中特定文化的测试项目进行了修改。在翻译成两种当地语言后,对所有测试项目进行了预试验和微调。使用1597名年龄在4天至70.6个月的健康儿童,确定每个测试项目的25%、50%、75%和90%通过年龄作为发育里程碑。在90%通过年龄时,比较改编版和Denver II的发育里程碑达成情况。检验改编工具的可靠性。
总共改编了36个(28.8%)测试项目,大部分来自个人社交领域。在42个(34%)测试项目上,两个版本的发育里程碑达成年龄存在显著差异。改编后的工具在123个(98%)项目上具有出色的评分者间信度,在119个(91%)项目上具有较高至出色的重测信度。
西方发育评估工具可以可靠地改编用于低收入环境。达成发育里程碑的年龄差异表明,正确评估儿童发育需要特定人群的标准。