Barratt Barnaby B
Wits Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Witwatersrand, The Heritage Stone House, 122 Virginia Avenue, Parkmore, Johannesburg, 2196, South Africa.
Int J Psychoanal. 2017 Feb;98(1):39-53. doi: 10.1111/1745-8315.12563. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
It is argued that only free-association methodically opens the discourse of self-consciousness (the representations available to reflective awareness) to the voicing of the repressed. The method is key to Freud's originality and the sine qua non of any genuinely psychoanalytic process. Clinical procedures which do not prioritize a steadfast and ongoing commitment to this method (instead emphasizing either interpretative formulations, as decisive acts that appear to fix and finalize the meaning of a particular lived experience, or the vicissitudes of transference-countertransference in the immediate treatment situation) all too readily entrap the treatment, limiting its capacity to divulge the power of unconscious processes. Influenced by Laplanche, Freud's 1920 principles of lifefulness and deathfulness (the binding and unbinding of psychic energy in representations) facilitate an understanding of the unique significance of free-associative discourse in opening the representational textuality of self-consciousness to the voicing of that which is otherwise than representationality and reason. The 'otherwise' is intimated as the returning force of the repressed, as the 'unfathomable navel' of 'thing-presentations,' experienced and expressed within the text of awareness, yet not translatable into the law and order of its logical and rhetorical reflections. Free-associative discourse thus affects self-consciousness in a way that is radically different from other creative procedures ('psychosynthetic' or integratively interpretive). In this respect, the status of free-associative praxis as necessary for a genuinely psychoanalytic process is justified.
有人认为,只有自由联想方法能有条不紊地开启自我意识的话语(可供反思性觉知的表象),让被压抑的内容得以发声。该方法是弗洛伊德原创性的关键所在,也是任何真正精神分析过程的必要条件。那些没有将坚定且持续地运用此方法置于优先地位的临床程序(而是要么强调解释性表述,将其视为似乎能固定并终结特定生活经历意义的决定性行为,要么强调即时治疗情境中移情 - 反移情的变迁),很容易使治疗陷入困境,限制其揭示无意识过程力量的能力。受拉康影响,弗洛伊德1920年关于生命性与死亡性的原则(表象中精神能量的束缚与释放)有助于理解自由联想话语在开启自我意识的表象文本性,使其向超越表象性与理性的内容发声方面的独特意义。“超越之物”被暗示为被压抑内容的回归力量,是“物表象”的“深不可测的肚脐”,在觉知文本中被体验和表达,但无法转化为其逻辑和修辞反思的法则与秩序。因此,自由联想话语对自我意识的影响方式与其他创造性程序(“心理综合”或综合解释性程序)截然不同。在这方面,自由联想实践作为真正精神分析过程的必要条件的地位是合理的。