Suppr超能文献

多中心研究评估腹腔镜子宫动脉阻断联合肌瘤切除术治疗有症状子宫平滑肌瘤的临床效果。

Multicentre study to evaluate the clinical effects of laparoscopic uterine artery occlusion in combination with myomectomy to treat symptomatic uterine leiomyomas.

作者信息

Yang W, Cheng Z, Yu J, Yang H, Liu Z, Ren Q, Xu L

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Yangpu Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; Institute of Gynaecologic Minimally Invasive Medicine, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Yangpu Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; Institute of Gynaecologic Minimally Invasive Medicine, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Sep;204:9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.05.033. Epub 2016 May 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Uterine artery occlusion is often used to treat symptomatic uterine myomas, as this is a minimally invasive approach. However, alternative methods for uterus-sparing therapy are in development. This study aimed to compare the clinical effects of laparoscopic uterine artery occlusion (LUAO) in combination with laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) with LM alone for the management of symptomatic uterine leiomyomas.

STUDY DESIGN

This multicentre study was a retrospective controlled investigation. In total, 618 patients with symptomatic uterine myomas from six hospitals in Eastern China underwent LUAO+LM or LM alone between June 2011 and December 2012. Operative time, blood loss, transfusion, highest temperature, postoperative hospital stay, complications and follow-up results were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Complete clinical data were available for 504 patients. Among these, 324 patients underwent LUAO+LM and 180 patients underwent LM alone. Mean±standard deviation blood loss, transfusion, highest peri-operative temperature and duration of hospital stay were significantly lower in the LUAO+LM group compared with the LM group (83.61±53.70ml vs 109±58.43ml, 1.85% vs 6.11%, 37.6±0.40°C vs 37.9±0.45°C and 5.11±0.62 days vs 6.10±0.83 days, respectively). The mean duration of follow-up was 38.97±5.82 months in the LUAO+LM group and 37.30±2.25 months in the LM group (p>0.05). The relief of abnormal uterine bleeding, reduction of uterine volume and recurrence of myomas were more remarkable in the LUAO+LM group than the LM group (97.22% vs 83.75%, 62.42% vs 51.83% and 3.47% vs 10.63%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

LUAO in combination with LM was associated with higher surgical quality, greater relief of abnormal symptoms and less recurrence of myomas compared with LM alone. LUAO in combination with LM is recommended for women with symptomatic uterine myomas who wish to preserve their uterus.

摘要

目的

子宫动脉栓塞术常被用于治疗有症状的子宫肌瘤,因为这是一种微创方法。然而,保留子宫的替代治疗方法正在研发中。本研究旨在比较腹腔镜子宫动脉栓塞术(LUAO)联合腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术(LM)与单纯LM治疗有症状子宫平滑肌瘤的临床效果。

研究设计

本多中心研究为一项回顾性对照调查。2011年6月至2012年12月期间,来自中国东部六家医院的618例有症状子宫肌瘤患者接受了LUAO+LM或单纯LM治疗。比较两组患者的手术时间、失血量、输血情况、最高体温、术后住院时间、并发症及随访结果。

结果

504例患者有完整的临床资料。其中,324例患者接受了LUAO+LM治疗,180例患者接受了单纯LM治疗。与LM组相比,LUAO+LM组的平均±标准差失血量、输血量、围手术期最高体温及住院时间显著更低(分别为83.61±53.70ml对109±58.43ml、1.85%对6.11%、37.6±0.40°C对37.9±0.45°C以及5.11±0.62天对6.10±0.83天)。LUAO+LM组的平均随访时间为38.97±5.82个月,LM组为37.30±2.25个月(p>0.05)。LUAO+LM组在异常子宫出血缓解、子宫体积缩小及肌瘤复发方面比LM组更显著(分别为97.22%对83.75%、62.42%对51.83%以及3.47%对10.63%)。

结论

与单纯LM相比,LUAO联合LM具有更高的手术质量、更显著的异常症状缓解及更低的肌瘤复发率。对于希望保留子宫的有症状子宫肌瘤女性,推荐LUAO联合LM治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验