Wood Joanne M, Black Alex A, Mallon Kerry, Thomas Ravi, Owsley Cynthia
School of Optometry and Vision Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Queensland Eye Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 29;11(7):e0158318. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158318. eCollection 2016.
To comprehensively investigate the types of driving errors and locations that are most problematic for older drivers with glaucoma compared to those without glaucoma using a standardized on-road assessment.
Participants included 75 drivers with glaucoma (mean = 73.2±6.0 years) with mild to moderate field loss (better-eye MD = -1.21 dB; worse-eye MD = -7.75 dB) and 70 age-matched controls without glaucoma (mean = 72.6 ± 5.0 years). On-road driving performance was assessed in a dual-brake vehicle by an occupational therapist using a standardized scoring system which assessed the types of driving errors and the locations where they were made and the number of critical errors that required an instructor intervention. Driving safety was rated on a 10-point scale. Self-reported driving ability and difficulties were recorded using the Driving Habits Questionnaire.
Drivers with glaucoma were rated as significantly less safe, made more driving errors, and had almost double the rate of critical errors than those without glaucoma. Driving errors involved lane positioning and planning/approach, and were significantly more likely to occur at traffic lights and yield/give-way intersections. There were few between group differences in self-reported driving ability.
Older drivers with glaucoma with even mild to moderate field loss exhibit impairments in driving ability, particularly during complex driving situations that involve tactical problems with lane-position, planning ahead and observation. These results, together with the fact that these drivers self-report their driving to be relatively good, reinforce the need for evidence-based on-road assessments for evaluating driving fitness.
使用标准化的道路评估,全面调查与非青光眼老年驾驶员相比,青光眼老年驾驶员最易出现问题的驾驶错误类型和位置。
参与者包括75名患有青光眼的驾驶员(平均年龄 = 73.2±6.0岁),其视野损失为轻度至中度(较好眼平均缺损 = -1.21 dB;较差眼平均缺损 = -7.75 dB),以及70名年龄匹配的非青光眼对照者(平均年龄 = 72.6 ± 5.0岁)。职业治疗师在双制动车辆中使用标准化评分系统评估道路驾驶性能,该系统评估驾驶错误的类型、发生位置以及需要教练干预的严重错误数量。驾驶安全性按10分制评分。使用驾驶习惯问卷记录自我报告的驾驶能力和困难。
与非青光眼驾驶员相比,患有青光眼的驾驶员被评为安全性显著较低,驾驶错误更多,严重错误发生率几乎高出一倍。驾驶错误涉及车道定位和规划/接近,并且在交通信号灯处以及让行/让路路口更有可能发生。两组在自我报告的驾驶能力方面几乎没有差异。
即使是轻度至中度视野损失的青光眼老年驾驶员在驾驶能力方面也存在损害,特别是在涉及车道位置、提前规划和观察等战术问题的复杂驾驶情况下。这些结果,再加上这些驾驶员自我报告其驾驶情况相对良好这一事实,强化了基于证据的道路评估以评估驾驶适宜性的必要性。