Kim Nam Hoon, Kim Tae Joon, Kim Nan Hee, Choi Kyung Mook, Baik Sei Hyun, Choi Dong Seop, Park Yousung, Kim Sin Gon
Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine Department of Statistics, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jul;95(30):e4403. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004403.
Both low socioeconomic status (SES) and diabetes mellitus (DM) are important risk factors for mortality. However, little is known about their combined effects and relative contribution to the mortality risk.From a nationwide cohort provided by the National Health Insurance Service in Korea, 153,075 subjects who were over 30 years of age from 2003 to 2004 were followed-up until 2010. The SESs of the subjects in the DM and non-DM (NDM) groups were categorized into 3 groups (highest 30% as S1, middle 40% as S2, and lowest 30% as S3) based on the subjects' income levels.During the 7.9-year follow-up, 3933 deaths occurred. When the subjects were stratified into 6 groups by their socioeconomic and diabetes status, a linearly increasing pattern of the hazard ratio (HR) of mortality from the higher SES without diabetes group (NDM-S1, as a reference) to the lower SES with diabetes group (DM-S3; HR, 2.04, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.80-2.36) was observed (P for trend < 0.001). Notably, subjects with DM in the highest SES group (DM-S1) had a significantly higher mortality risk than did non-DM subjects in the lowest SES group (NDM-S3). This pattern was maintained in cause-specific mortality but was more prominent in cardiovascular disease (CVD) and less prominent in cancer mortality. The association was not affected by gender; however, in individuals <60 years of age, the combined effects of SES and DM on mortality were more prominent (DM-S3; HR, 3.68, 95% CI, 2.95-4.60) than in those ≥60 years of age.Low SES and DM were major determinants of mortality and synergistically increased the risks of all-cause, CVD, and cancer mortality.
社会经济地位低下(SES)和糖尿病(DM)都是死亡率的重要危险因素。然而,关于它们的联合效应以及对死亡风险的相对贡献,人们所知甚少。从韩国国民健康保险服务提供的全国性队列中,选取了2003年至2004年30岁以上的153,075名受试者,随访至2010年。根据受试者的收入水平,将糖尿病组(DM)和非糖尿病组(NDM)受试者的SES分为3组(最高30%为S1,中间40%为S2,最低30%为S3)。在7.9年的随访期间,发生了3933例死亡。当根据社会经济和糖尿病状况将受试者分为6组时,观察到从高SES无糖尿病组(NDM-S1,作为参照)到低SES糖尿病组(DM-S3;风险比(HR)为2.04,95%置信区间(CI)为1.80 - 2.36)死亡率的HR呈线性增加模式(趋势P<0.001)。值得注意的是,最高SES组中的糖尿病受试者(DM-S1)的死亡风险显著高于最低SES组中的非糖尿病受试者(NDM-S3)。这种模式在特定病因死亡率中依然存在,但在心血管疾病(CVD)中更为显著,在癌症死亡率中则不太显著。该关联不受性别的影响;然而,在年龄<60岁的个体中,SES和DM对死亡率的联合效应比年龄≥60岁的个体更为显著(DM-S3;HR为3.68,95%CI为2.95 - 4.60)。低SES和DM是死亡率的主要决定因素,并协同增加了全因、CVD和癌症死亡风险。