Smith Thomas J
Work. 2016 Jul 25;54(4):853-72. doi: 10.3233/WOR-162358.
Prior research documents occupancy and patient care quality (OPCQ) benefits for private room (PR) relative to multi-bed (MB) designs in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).
To extend this research design to four additional types of children's hospital units: a cardiovascular care center (CVCC), an infant care center (ICC), a medical/surgical unit (Med/Surg), and a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).
Staff comments, task activities, patient care demands, and perceptual survey rankings for twelve major indicators of OPCQ were assessed with nursing staff on these units plus an NICU.
With the PR designs, for 38 of 48 pairwise comparisons for the twelve major OPCQ indicators, CVCC staff rankings are significantly lower than those by staff on the other four units. For 47 of 48 pairwise comparisons for the twelve major OPCQ indicators, NICU, ICC, Med/Surg, and PICU staff rankings for PR designs do not differ significantly from those for MB designs. Comments by staff on all five units target numerous PR OPCQ defects.
Design, operation and management of the patient care environments on the five different PR units evaluated in this research confront a challenge in realizing OPCQ benefits that match experience with PR NICU designs in other contexts.
先前的研究记录了新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)中,与多床(MB)设计相比,单人病房(PR)在占用率和患者护理质量(OPCQ)方面的优势。
将该研究设计扩展到另外四种儿童医院科室:心血管护理中心(CVCC)、婴儿护理中心(ICC)、内科/外科病房(Med/Surg)和儿科重症监护病房(PICU)。
对这些科室以及一个NICU的护理人员,就OPCQ的十二个主要指标评估员工意见、任务活动、患者护理需求和感知调查排名。
对于十二个主要OPCQ指标的48对比较中的38对,采用PR设计时,CVCC员工的排名显著低于其他四个科室员工的排名。对于十二个主要OPCQ指标的48对比较中的47对,采用PR设计时,NICU、ICC、Med/Surg和PICU员工的排名与采用MB设计时相比没有显著差异。所有五个科室的员工意见都指出了PR的众多OPCQ缺陷。
本研究评估的五个不同PR科室的患者护理环境的设计、运营和管理,在实现与其他环境中PR NICU设计相匹配的OPCQ优势方面面临挑战。