Murshid N S, Ely G E
School of Social Work, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, United States.
School of Social Work, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, United States.
Public Health. 2016 Oct;139:141-147. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.06.019. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
Our objective was to assess whether microfinance participation affords greater contraceptive decision-making power to women.
Population based secondary data analysis.
In this cross-sectional study using nationally representative data from the Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2011 we conducted multinomial logistic regression to estimate the odds of contraceptive decision-making by respondents and their husbands based on microfinance participation. Microfinance participation was measured as a dichotomous variable and contraceptive decision-making was conceptualized based on who made decisions about contraceptive use: respondents only; their partners or husbands only; or both.
The odds of decision-making by the respondent, with the reference case being joint decision-making, were higher for microfinance participants, but they were not significant. The odds of decision-making by the husband, with the reference case again being joint decision-making, were significantly lower among men who were partnered with women who participated in microfinance (RRR = 0.70, P < 0.01).
Microfinance participation by women allowed men to share decision-making power with their wives that resulted in higher odds of joint decision-making.
我们的目的是评估参与小额信贷是否能赋予女性更大的避孕决策权力。
基于人群的二次数据分析。
在这项横断面研究中,我们使用了2011年孟加拉国人口与健康调查的全国代表性数据,进行多项逻辑回归,以估计受访者及其丈夫基于小额信贷参与情况做出避孕决策的几率。小额信贷参与情况作为一个二分变量来衡量,避孕决策则根据谁做出避孕使用决策来进行概念化:仅受访者;仅其伴侣或丈夫;或双方。
以共同决策为参照情况,参与小额信贷的受访者做出决策的几率更高,但并不显著。以共同决策为参照情况,在与参与小额信贷的女性为伴侣的男性中,丈夫做出决策的几率显著更低(相对风险比 = 0.70,P < 0.01)。
女性参与小额信贷使男性与妻子分享决策权力,从而增加了共同决策的几率。