Golub Sarit A, Gamarel Kristi E, Lelutiu-Weinberger Corina
Department of Psychology, Hunter College of CUNY, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Psychology, Graduate Center of CUNY, New York, NY, USA.
AIDS Behav. 2017 May;21(5):1315-1324. doi: 10.1007/s10461-016-1512-9.
Despite demonstrated efficacy, uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) remains low, especially among highest priority populations. This study examined four PrEP messaging factors hypothesized to impact comprehension of PrEP educational information: (1) modality (video versus in-person message delivery); (2) frame (risk versus health focus); (3) specificity (gist versus verbatim efficacy information); and (4) sexual history (administered either before or after PrEP education). We examined message comprehension among 157 young people of color (YPoC) eligible for PrEP, using a series of multiple choice questions. Overall, 65.6 % (n = 103) got all message comprehension questions correct. In multivariate analyses, engaging in a sexual history before receiving PrEP education was associated with increased odds of message comprehension (aOR 2.23; 95 % CI 1.06-4.72). This effect was even stronger among those who received PrEP education via video (aOR 3.53; 95 % CI 1.16-10.81) compared to via health educator. This research underscores the importance of sexual history-taking as part of PrEP education and clinical practice for YPoC, and suggests that engaging patients in a sexual history prior to providing them with PrEP education may be key to increasing comprehension.
尽管暴露前预防(PrEP)已证实有效,但其使用率仍然很低,尤其是在最需要的人群中。本研究调查了四个假设会影响PrEP教育信息理解的因素:(1)形式(视频与面对面信息传递);(2)框架(风险与健康关注点);(3)特异性(要点与逐字疗效信息);以及(4)性史(在PrEP教育之前或之后进行询问)。我们使用一系列多项选择题,对157名符合PrEP条件的有色人种年轻人(YPoC)的信息理解情况进行了调查。总体而言,65.6%(n = 103)的人所有信息理解问题都回答正确。在多变量分析中,在接受PrEP教育之前了解性史与信息理解几率增加相关(调整后比值比[aOR]为2.23;95%置信区间[CI]为1.06 - 4.72)。与通过健康教育工作者接受PrEP教育的人相比,通过视频接受PrEP教育的人这种效果更强(aOR为3.53;95% CI为1.16 - 10.81)。本研究强调了了解性史作为YPoC的PrEP教育和临床实践一部分的重要性,并表明在为患者提供PrEP教育之前让他们讲述性史可能是提高理解的关键。