Williams J G
School of Movement Science, University of Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Percept Mot Skills. 1989 Jun;68(3 Pt 1):891-6. doi: 10.2466/pms.1989.68.3.891.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether movement production during modelling would register timing changes communicated by a model during video-demonstration of a throwing action. 60 boys, 12 yr. of age, were placed in three groups and observed a computer-simulated, point-light demonstration of a darts-style movement used by a model to project a lightweight ball about 2.5 m in a forward direction. Only the relative motion of model's wrist, elbow, and shoulder were displayed. First, subjects were required to identify the action. Immediate response was 88% for the fastest demonstration (model's natural cadence with a wrist velocity of 3.5 rad./sec.), 81% (1.45 rad./sec.), and 65% (0.92 rad./sec.). Second, 3 subjects (1 from each of the original groups) modelled the action when the directional change of the model's arm and its spatial arrangement were held constant but the timing of traverse of the arm was randomly varied (3 levels). Analysis showed that all subjects produced the correct sequence of movement. There were no differences in production of the spatial parameters of the demonstrations but significant differences in the modelling of the timing parameters. These findings are related to the use of visual demonstrations during motor skill instruction and, particularly, the communication of specific aspects of an action.
本研究的目的是确定在模拟过程中的动作产生是否会记录模型在投掷动作视频演示过程中传达的时间变化。60名12岁的男孩被分为三组,观察了一个计算机模拟的、点光源演示的飞镖式动作,模型用这个动作向前投射一个约2.5米远的轻质球。只显示了模型手腕、肘部和肩部的相对运动。首先,要求受试者识别动作。对于最快的演示(模型自然节奏,手腕速度为3.5弧度/秒),即时反应率为88%;对于速度为1.45弧度/秒的演示,即时反应率为81%;对于速度为0.92弧度/秒的演示,即时反应率为65%。其次,当模型手臂的方向变化及其空间排列保持不变,但手臂移动的时间随机变化(3个水平)时,3名受试者(每组1名)模拟该动作。分析表明,所有受试者都产生了正确的动作顺序。演示的空间参数的产生没有差异,但时间参数的模拟存在显著差异。这些发现与运动技能教学中视觉演示的使用有关,特别是与动作特定方面的传达有关。