Laestadius Linnea I, Wahl Megan M, Cho Young I
a Joseph J. Zilber School of Public Health , University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee , Milwaukee , Wisconsin , USA.
Subst Use Misuse. 2016 Oct 14;51(12):1669-1673. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2016.1188958. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
The growth of social networking services has enabled the sharing of electronic cigarette opinions and experiences via user-generated content.
This exploratory study analyzed electronic cigarette content found on the visual social networking service, Instagram, in order to highlight public health challenges created by this content and support understanding of electronic cigarette promotion and usage.
A qualitative content analysis was performed on Instagram posts made with the hashtags #ecig or #vape in October 2014. Images, text, and hashtags from 85 posts (43 #ecig, 42 #vape) were analyzed. In addition, the total number of posts made with eight key electronic cigarette hashtags was recorded at four points between March 2014 and October 2015.
The total number of #vape posts on Instagram grew by 4,163,274 during the study period, while #ecig posts increased by 741,916. Of the posts examined in-depth, corporate users made up over half of posts. No posts were critical of electronic cigarettes. Few mentioned electronic cigarettes in the context of health benefits. No posts included major brands, and mod style electronic cigarettes were mentioned or depicted in over half of posts. A majority of posts included hashtags expressing vaping identity and community. In addition, users mentioned novel practices such as sub-ohming. Conclusions/Importance: Instagram users in our sample characterized electronic cigarettes primarily as novel devices rather than equivalents to cigarettes. Further, hashtag communities and identities appear to be forming around vaping. Future research should consider the public health implications of these hashtags, as well as novel electronic cigarette practices.
社交网络服务的发展使得通过用户生成内容来分享电子烟观点和体验成为可能。
这项探索性研究分析了视觉社交网络服务Instagram上的电子烟内容,以突出此类内容所带来的公共卫生挑战,并支持对电子烟推广和使用的理解。
对2014年10月带有#电子烟或#蒸汽烟标签的Instagram帖子进行了定性内容分析。分析了85篇帖子(43篇#电子烟,42篇#蒸汽烟)的图片、文字和标签。此外,记录了2014年3月至2015年10月期间四个时间点带有八个关键电子烟标签的帖子总数。
在研究期间,Instagram上#蒸汽烟帖子的总数增加了4,163,274,而#电子烟帖子增加了741,916。在深入研究的帖子中,企业用户占帖子总数的一半以上。没有帖子对电子烟持批评态度。很少有帖子在提及健康益处的背景下提到电子烟。没有帖子包含主要品牌,超过一半的帖子提到或描绘了改装风格的电子烟。大多数帖子包含表达蒸汽烟身份和社区的标签。此外,用户提到了诸如低电阻雾化等新做法。结论/重要性:我们样本中的Instagram用户主要将电子烟视为新颖的设备,而非等同于香烟。此外,围绕蒸汽烟似乎正在形成标签社区和身份。未来的研究应考虑这些标签以及新型电子烟做法对公共卫生的影响。