The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, OH 43210, United States; The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH 43210, United States.
The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, OH 43210, United States.
Prev Med Rep. 2016 Jul 13;4:303-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.07.006. eCollection 2016 Dec.
< 3% of Americans have ideal cardiovascular health (CVH). The primary care encounter provides a setting in which to conduct patient-provider discussions of CVH. We implemented a CVH risk assessment, visualization, and decision-making tool that automatically populates with electronic health record (EHR) data during the encounter in order to encourage patient-centered CVH discussions among at-risk, yet under-treated, populations. We quantified five of the seven CVH behaviors and factors that were available in The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center's EHR at baseline (May-July 2013) and compared values to those ascertained at one-year (May-July 2014) among intervention (n = 109) and control (n = 42) patients. The CVH of women in the intervention clinic improved relative to the metrics of body mass index (16% to 21% ideal) and diabetes (62% to 68% ideal), but not for smoking, total cholesterol, or blood pressure. Meanwhile, the CVH of women in the control clinic either held constant or worsened slightly as measured using those same metrics. Providers need easy-to-use tools at the point-of-care to help patients improve CVH. We demonstrated that the EHR could deliver such a tool using an existing American Heart Association framework, and we noted small improvements in CVH in our patient population. Future work is needed to assess how to best harness the potential of such tools in order to have the greatest impact on the CVH of a larger patient population.
<3%的美国人拥有理想的心血管健康(CVH)。初级保健就诊为医患讨论 CVH 提供了一个环境。我们实施了 CVH 风险评估、可视化和决策工具,该工具在就诊期间会自动从电子健康记录(EHR)数据中提取信息,以便在高危但治疗不足的人群中鼓励以患者为中心的 CVH 讨论。我们量化了七种 CVH 行为和因素中的五种,这些行为和因素在俄亥俄州立大学韦克斯纳医学中心的 EHR 中基线(2013 年 5 月至 7 月)可用,并将这些值与干预组(n=109)和对照组(n=42)患者在一年(2014 年 5 月至 7 月)时确定的值进行了比较。干预诊所的女性 CVH 相对于体重指数(16%到 21%理想)和糖尿病(62%到 68%理想)的指标有所改善,但吸烟、总胆固醇和血压则没有改善。与此同时,对照组女性的 CVH 则保持不变或根据相同指标略微恶化。临床医生需要在护理点使用易于使用的工具来帮助患者改善 CVH。我们证明了 EHR 可以使用现有的美国心脏协会框架来提供这样的工具,并且我们注意到患者群体的 CVH 有了微小的改善。未来需要进一步评估如何最好地利用这些工具的潜力,以便对更大的患者群体的 CVH 产生最大影响。