• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实时累积网络荟萃分析:针对表皮生长因子受体野生型或未知状态的晚期非小细胞肺癌二线治疗的方案。

Live cumulative network meta-analysis: protocol for second-line treatments in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with wild-type or unknown status for epidermal growth factor receptor.

机构信息

Centre de Recherche Epidémiologie et Statistique Paris Sorbonne Cité, INSERM U1153, Paris, France Université Paris Descartes-Sorbonne Paris cité, Paris, France.

Centre de Recherche Epidémiologie et Statistique Paris Sorbonne Cité, INSERM U1153, Paris, France Université Paris Descartes-Sorbonne Paris cité, Paris, France Centre d'Epidémiologie Clinique, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, Paris, France Cochrane France, Paris, France.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 3;6(8):e011841. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011841.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011841
PMID:27489157
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4985872/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Many second-line treatments for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been assessed in randomised controlled trials, but which treatments work the best remains unclear. Novel treatments are being rapidly developed. We need a comprehensive up-to-date evidence synthesis of all these treatments. We present the protocol for a live cumulative network meta-analysis (NMA) to address this need.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will consider trials of second-line treatments in patients with advanced NSCLC with wild-type or unknown epidermal growth factor receptor status. We will consider any single agent of cytotoxic chemotherapy, targeted therapy, combination of cytotoxic chemotherapy and targeted therapy and any combination of targeted therapies. The primary outcomes will be overall survival and progression-free survival. The live cumulative NMA will be initiated with a NMA and then iterations will be repeated at regular intervals to keep the NMA up-to-date over time. We have defined the update frequency as 4 months, based on an assessment of the pace of evidence production on this topic. Each iteration will consist of six methodological steps: adaptive search for treatments and trials, screening of reports and selection of trials, data extraction, assessment of risk of bias, update of the network of trials and synthesis, and dissemination. We will set up a research community in lung cancer, with different groups of contributors of different skills. We will distribute tasks through online crowdsourcing. This proof-of-concept study in second-line treatments of advanced NSCLC will allow one for assessing the feasibility of live cumulative NMA and opening the path for this new form of synthesis.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not required because our study will not include confidential participant data and interventions. The description of all the steps and the results of this live cumulative NMA will be available online.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42015017592.

摘要

简介

许多针对晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的二线治疗方法已经在随机对照试验中进行了评估,但哪种治疗方法效果最好仍不清楚。新的治疗方法正在迅速开发中。我们需要对所有这些治疗方法进行全面的最新证据综合。我们提出了一个实时累积网络荟萃分析(NMA)的方案来满足这一需求。

方法和分析

我们将考虑针对表皮生长因子受体野生型或未知状态的晚期 NSCLC 患者的二线治疗试验。我们将考虑任何单一的细胞毒性化疗药物、靶向治疗药物、细胞毒性化疗药物和靶向治疗药物的联合以及任何靶向治疗药物的联合。主要结局将是总生存期和无进展生存期。实时累积 NMA 将从 NMA 开始,然后每隔一段时间重复迭代,以随时间保持 NMA 的最新状态。我们根据对该主题证据产生速度的评估,将更新频率定义为 4 个月。每次迭代将包括六个方法步骤:治疗方法和试验的自适应搜索、报告筛选和试验选择、数据提取、偏倚风险评估、试验网络和综合更新以及传播。我们将在肺癌领域建立一个研究社区,不同技能的不同群体将成为贡献者。我们将通过在线众包分配任务。这项针对晚期 NSCLC 二线治疗的概念验证研究将评估实时累积 NMA 的可行性,并为这种新形式的综合研究开辟道路。

伦理和传播

由于我们的研究不包括机密参与者数据和干预措施,因此不需要伦理批准。所有步骤的描述和实时累积 NMA 的结果将在网上提供。

注册号

CRD42015017592。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b12/4985872/d5a395a63677/bmjopen2016011841f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b12/4985872/872f29943445/bmjopen2016011841f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b12/4985872/d5a395a63677/bmjopen2016011841f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b12/4985872/872f29943445/bmjopen2016011841f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b12/4985872/d5a395a63677/bmjopen2016011841f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Live cumulative network meta-analysis: protocol for second-line treatments in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with wild-type or unknown status for epidermal growth factor receptor.实时累积网络荟萃分析:针对表皮生长因子受体野生型或未知状态的晚期非小细胞肺癌二线治疗的方案。
BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 3;6(8):e011841. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011841.
2
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
3
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
4
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
6
Chemotherapy with cetuximab versus chemotherapy alone for chemotherapy-naive advanced non-small cell lung cancer.西妥昔单抗联合化疗与单纯化疗用于初治晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 17;2014(11):CD009948. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009948.pub2.
7
First-line treatment of advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation positive non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.晚期表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变阳性非鳞状非小细胞肺癌的一线治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 25(5):CD010383. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010383.pub2.
8
Gefitinib for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.吉非替尼用于治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):CD006847. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006847.pub2.
9
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
10
Interventions for central serous chorioretinopathy: a network meta-analysis.中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变的干预措施:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 16;6(6):CD011841. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011841.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews1.系统评价最佳工具和实践指南 1.
J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2023;16(2):241-273. doi: 10.3233/PRM-230019.
2
Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews.系统评价最佳工具和实践指南。
Syst Rev. 2023 Jun 8;12(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02255-9.
3
Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews.系统评价最佳工具和实践指南。

本文引用的文献

1
Living cumulative network meta-analysis to reduce waste in research: A paradigmatic shift for systematic reviews?利用生存累积网络荟萃分析减少研究中的浪费:系统评价的范式转变?
BMC Med. 2016 Mar 29;14:59. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0596-4.
2
Wasted research when systematic reviews fail to provide a complete and up-to-date evidence synthesis: the example of lung cancer.当系统评价未能提供完整且最新的证据综合时,研究就被浪费了:以肺癌为例。
BMC Med. 2016 Jan 20;14:8. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0555-0.
3
Clinician Perspective on Molecular Profiling of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.
BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Jun 8;23(1):383. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08304-x.
4
A Markov chain approach for ranking treatments in network meta-analysis.基于马尔可夫链的网络荟萃分析中治疗方法的排序方法。
Stat Med. 2021 Jan 30;40(2):451-464. doi: 10.1002/sim.8784. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
5
Critical Appraisal of Published Indirect Comparisons and Network Meta-Analyses of Competing Interventions for Multiple Myeloma.对多发性骨髓瘤多种竞争干预措施的已发表间接比较和网络荟萃分析的批判性评价。
Value Health. 2020 Apr;23(4):441-450. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.11.003. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
6
Borrowing of strength from indirect evidence in 40 network meta-analyses.从 40 项网络荟萃分析中的间接证据中借力。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Feb;106:41-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.10.007. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
7
A brief history of clinical evidence updates and bibliographic databases.临床证据更新与文献数据库简史。
J R Soc Med. 2018 Aug;111(8):292-301. doi: 10.1177/0141076818788819.
8
The currency, completeness and quality of systematic reviews of acute management of moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: A comprehensive evidence map.颅脑创伤急性期中重度管理的系统评价的货币、完整性和质量:全面证据图谱。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 21;13(6):e0198676. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198676. eCollection 2018.
9
Living network meta-analysis compared with pairwise meta-analysis in comparative effectiveness research: empirical study.比较效果研究中生存网络荟萃分析与成对荟萃分析的比较:实证研究
BMJ. 2018 Feb 28;360:k585. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k585.
10
Computational Challenges and Collaborative Projects in the NCI Quantitative Imaging Network.美国国立癌症研究所定量成像网络中的计算挑战与合作项目
Tomography. 2016 Dec;2(4):242-249. doi: 10.18383/j.tom.2016.00265.
临床医生对非小细胞肺癌分子谱分析的观点
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Mar 10;34(8):884-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.2040. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
4
Meta-Analysis of a Complex Network of Non-Pharmacological Interventions: The Example of Femoral Neck Fracture.非药物干预复杂网络的Meta分析:以股骨颈骨折为例
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 6;11(1):e0146336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146336. eCollection 2016.
5
The Use of Bayesian Networks to Assess the Quality of Evidence from Research Synthesis: 2. Inter-Rater Reliability and Comparison with Standard GRADE Assessment.使用贝叶斯网络评估研究综合证据的质量:2. 评分者间信度及与标准GRADE评估的比较。
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 30;10(12):e0123511. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123511. eCollection 2015.
6
Machine learning to assist risk-of-bias assessments in systematic reviews.机器学习辅助系统评价中的偏倚风险评估。
Int J Epidemiol. 2016 Feb;45(1):266-77. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv306. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
7
Supporting systematic reviews using LDA-based document representations.使用基于潜在狄利克雷分配(LDA)的文档表示法支持系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 26;4:172. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0117-0.
8
Systemic Therapy for Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update.IV期非小细胞肺癌的全身治疗:美国临床肿瘤学会临床实践指南更新
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Oct 20;33(30):3488-515. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.1342. Epub 2015 Aug 31.
9
Faster title and abstract screening? Evaluating Abstrackr, a semi-automated online screening program for systematic reviewers.更快的标题和摘要筛选?评估Abstrackr,一款用于系统评价者的半自动在线筛选程序。
Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 15;4:80. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0067-6.
10
The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations.PRISMA 扩展声明用于报告包含健康保健干预措施网络荟萃分析的系统评价:清单和说明。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jun 2;162(11):777-84. doi: 10.7326/M14-2385.