Sharma Saurabh, Tyagi Jaya Sivaswami
Department of Biotechnology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India.
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 4;11(8):e0160723. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160723. eCollection 2016.
DevR/DosR is a well-characterized regulator in Mycobacterium tuberculosis which is implicated in various processes ranging from dormancy/persistence to drug tolerance. DevR induces the expression of an ~48-gene dormancy regulon in response to gaseous stresses, including hypoxia. Strains of the Beijing lineage constitutively express this regulon, which may confer upon them a significant advantage, since they would be 'pre-adapted' to the environmental stresses that predominate during infection. Aerobic DevR regulon expression in laboratory-manipulated overexpression strains is also reported. In both instances, the need for an inducing signal is bypassed. While a phosphorylation-mediated conformational change in DevR was proposed as the activation mechanism under hypoxia, the mechanism underlying constitutive expression is not understood. Because DevR is implicated in bacterial dormancy/persistence and is a promising drug target, it is relevant to resolve the mechanistic puzzle of hypoxic activation on one hand and constitutive expression under 'non-inducing' conditions on the other. Here, an overexpression strategy was employed to elucidate the DevR activation mechanism. Using a panel of kinase and transcription factor mutants, we establish that DevR, upon overexpression, circumvents DevS/DosT sensor kinase-mediated or small molecule phosphodonor-dependent activation, and also cooperativity-mediated effects, which are key aspects of hypoxic activation mechanism. However, overexpression failed to rescue the defect of C-terminal-truncated DevR lacking the α10 helix, establishing the α10 helix as an indispensable component of DevR activation mechanism. We propose that aerobic overexpression of DevR likely increases the concentration of α10 helix-mediated active dimer species to above the threshold level, as during hypoxia, and enables regulon expression. This advance in the understanding of DevR activation mechanism clarifies a long standing question as to the mechanism of DevR overexpression-mediated induction of the regulon in the absence of the normal environmental cue and establishes the α10 helix as an universal and pivotal targeting interface for DevR inhibitor development.
DevR/DosR是结核分枝杆菌中一个已被充分表征的调节因子,它参与了从休眠/持续存在到耐药性等各种过程。DevR会响应包括缺氧在内的气态应激,诱导一个约48个基因的休眠调节子的表达。北京家族的菌株组成型表达这个调节子,这可能赋予它们显著优势,因为它们将“预先适应”感染期间占主导地位的环境应激。也有报道称在实验室操作的过表达菌株中存在需氧的DevR调节子表达。在这两种情况下,都绕过了对诱导信号的需求。虽然有人提出在缺氧条件下,DevR中由磷酸化介导的构象变化是激活机制,但组成型表达的潜在机制尚不清楚。由于DevR与细菌的休眠/持续存在有关,并且是一个有前景的药物靶点,一方面解决缺氧激活的机制难题,另一方面解决“非诱导”条件下组成型表达的机制难题是很有意义的。在这里,采用了一种过表达策略来阐明DevR的激活机制。使用一组激酶和转录因子突变体,我们确定DevR在过表达时,绕过了DevS/DosT传感器激酶介导的或小分子磷酸供体依赖性激活,以及协同介导的效应,而这些是缺氧激活机制的关键方面。然而,过表达未能挽救缺乏α10螺旋的C末端截短的DevR的缺陷,这确立了α10螺旋是DevR激活机制不可或缺的组成部分。我们提出,DevR的需氧过表达可能会使α10螺旋介导的活性二聚体物种的浓度增加到高于阈值水平,就像在缺氧期间一样,并使调节子能够表达。对DevR激活机制理解的这一进展澄清了一个长期存在的问题,即关于在没有正常环境线索的情况下DevR过表达介导的调节子诱导机制,并确立了α10螺旋是DevR抑制剂开发的通用且关键的靶向界面。