• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Research Review: Multi-informant integration in child and adolescent psychopathology diagnosis.研究综述:儿童和青少年精神病理学诊断中的多信息源整合
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2017 Feb;58(2):116-128. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12611. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
2
Strategic objectives for improving understanding of informant discrepancies in developmental psychopathology research.改善发展心理病理学研究中信息提供者差异理解的战略目标。
Dev Psychopathol. 2013 Aug;25(3):669-82. doi: 10.1017/S0954579413000096.
3
Only complementary voices tell the truth: a reevaluation of validity in multi-informant approaches of child and adolescent clinical assessments.只有相互补充的观点才能揭示真相:对儿童和青少年临床评估中多 informant 方法的有效性进行重新评估。 (注:这里“informant”可结合具体语境灵活翻译,比如“信息提供者”等 ,因未明确具体所指,保留英文更准确些)
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2016 Aug;123(8):981-90. doi: 10.1007/s00702-016-1543-4. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
4
Challenges and benefits of assessment, diagnosis, and taxonomy for clinical practice and research.临床实践与研究中评估、诊断及分类学的挑战与益处。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2001 Jun;35(3):263-71. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1614.2001.00899.x.
5
The validity of the multi-informant approach to assessing child and adolescent mental health.多 informant 方法评估儿童和青少年心理健康的有效性。 (注:这里“informant”不太明确准确含义,可根据上下文进一步确定合适译法,比如“信息提供者”等 )
Psychol Bull. 2015 Jul;141(4):858-900. doi: 10.1037/a0038498. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
6
Informant discrepancies in the assessment of childhood psychopathology: a critical review, theoretical framework, and recommendations for further study.儿童精神病理学评估中的信息提供者差异:批判性综述、理论框架及进一步研究建议
Psychol Bull. 2005 Jul;131(4):483-509. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.4.483.
7
Moderators of informant agreement in the assessment of adolescent psychopathology: extension to a forensic sample.评估青少年精神病理学中信息提供者一致性的调节因素:对法医样本的扩展。
Psychol Assess. 2012 Jun;24(2):386-401. doi: 10.1037/a0025693. Epub 2011 Oct 3.
8
Dimensional approaches to psychiatric diagnosis in DSM-5.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)中精神障碍诊断的维度方法。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2011 Dec;14(4):197-200.
9
Integrating theory-driven and empirically-derived models of personality development and psychopathology: a proposal for DSM V.整合理论驱动和经验衍生的人格发展和精神病理学模型:DSM V 的建议。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2011 Feb;31(1):52-68. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.09.003. Epub 2010 Sep 18.
10
Transdiagnostic approaches to psychopathology measurement: Recommendations for measure selection, data analysis, and participant recruitment.跨诊断精神病理学测量方法:测量选择、数据分析和参与者招募的建议。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2020 Jan;129(1):21-28. doi: 10.1037/abn0000464.

引用本文的文献

1
How cluster B-related personality traits in mothers shape their ratings of their adolescents' personality: a multisource approach using the Trait-Reputation-Identity model.母亲中与B类人格特质相关的人格特征如何塑造她们对青少年人格的评价:一种使用特质-声誉-身份模型的多源方法。
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2025 Aug 7;12(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s40479-025-00301-7.
2
Assessing a prediction model for depression risk using an early adolescent sample with self-reported depression.使用自我报告有抑郁症的青少年早期样本评估抑郁症风险预测模型。
JCPP Adv. 2024 Sep 3;5(2):e12276. doi: 10.1002/jcv2.12276. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Longitudinal Changes in Preschoolers' Self-reported Psychological and Social Problems: Feasibility, Reliability, and Cross-informant Agreement.学龄前儿童自我报告的心理和社会问题的纵向变化:可行性、可靠性及多渠道信息一致性
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2025 Jun 10. doi: 10.1007/s10578-025-01864-w.
4
Sex differences in pediatric major depressive episodes: a cross-sectional study on psychiatric symptoms in early-onset mood disorders.儿童重度抑郁发作中的性别差异:早发性情绪障碍精神症状的横断面研究
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 25;16:1503794. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1503794. eCollection 2025.
5
Construction and initial validation of the International Trauma Questionnaire - Caregiver Version (ITQ-CG): assessing ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD in children from caregiver perspective.国际创伤问卷-照顾者版(ITQ-CG)的构建与初步验证:从照顾者角度评估儿童的国际疾病分类第11版创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂PTSD(CPTSD)
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2493025. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2493025. Epub 2025 May 6.
6
Reproducible structure with measurement invariance for the Parent-Report Early Adolescent Temperament Questionnaire: Findings from three independent samples.《父母报告的青少年早期气质问卷》具有测量不变性的可重复结构:来自三个独立样本的研究结果
Psychol Assess. 2025 May;37(5):214-226. doi: 10.1037/pas0001368.
7
Associations among externalizing psychopathology, personality, and behavioral traits: Models of an externalizing spectrum in youth.外化性精神病理学、人格与行为特质之间的关联:青少年外化性谱系模型
Personal Disord. 2025 Jan;16(1):8-17. doi: 10.1037/per0000686.
8
Longitudinal Changes in Preschoolers' Self-reported Psychological and Social Problems: Feasibility, Reliability, and Cross-informant Agreement.学龄前儿童自我报告的心理和社会问题的纵向变化:可行性、可靠性及多渠道信息一致性
Res Sq. 2024 Sep 2:rs.3.rs-4870307. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4870307/v1.
9
Parent version of the Eating Disorder Examination: Reliability and validity in a treatment-seeking sample.《饮食失调检查》的原始版本:寻求治疗样本中的信度和效度
J Eat Disord. 2024 Jul 18;12(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s40337-024-01062-4.
10
Attachment Problems and Mentalizing Capacity Relate to Parent-Child Informant Discrepancies in Female Adolescents with Borderline Personality Disorder.依恋问题和心理化能力与边缘型人格障碍女性青少年中亲子报告差异有关。
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2024 Jul 15. doi: 10.1007/s10578-024-01735-w.

本文引用的文献

1
The validity of the multi-informant approach to assessing child and adolescent mental health.多 informant 方法评估儿童和青少年心理健康的有效性。 (注:这里“informant”不太明确准确含义,可根据上下文进一步确定合适译法,比如“信息提供者”等 )
Psychol Bull. 2015 Jul;141(4):858-900. doi: 10.1037/a0038498. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
2
Psychometric Comparison of Self- and Informant-Reports of Personality.人格自评报告与他人报告的心理测量学比较
Assessment. 2015 Dec;22(6):655-64. doi: 10.1177/1073191114567942. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
3
Disclosure and Monitoring as Predictors of Mother-Adolescent Agreement in Reports of Early Adolescent Rule-Breaking Behavior.作为青少年早期违规行为报告中母子一致性预测因素的披露与监督
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2016;45(2):188-200. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2014.963856. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
4
Testing for measurement invariance and latent mean differences across methods: interesting incremental information from multitrait-multimethod studies.跨方法检验测量不变性和潜在均值差异:多特质-多方法研究中的有趣增量信息。
Front Psychol. 2014 Oct 30;5:1216. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01216. eCollection 2014.
5
A trifactor model for integrating ratings across multiple informants.一种整合多个信息提供者评分的三因素模型。
Psychol Methods. 2013 Dec;18(4):475-93. doi: 10.1037/a0032475. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
6
Strategic objectives for improving understanding of informant discrepancies in developmental psychopathology research.改善发展心理病理学研究中信息提供者差异理解的战略目标。
Dev Psychopathol. 2013 Aug;25(3):669-82. doi: 10.1017/S0954579413000096.
7
The development and psychometric properties of an informant-report form of the personality inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5).DSM-5 人格障碍检查表自评报告形式的编制与心理计量特性。
Assessment. 2013 Jun;20(3):370-83. doi: 10.1177/1073191113486513. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
8
Principles underlying the use of multiple informants' reports.多来源报告使用的基本原则。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2013;9:123-49. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185617. Epub 2012 Nov 5.
9
Testing informant discrepancies as predictors of early adolescent psychopathology: why difference scores cannot tell you what you want to know and how polynomial regression may.测试信息提供者的差异作为青少年早期精神病理学的预测指标:为什么差异分数不能告诉您想知道的内容,以及多项式回归如何可以。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2013 Jan;41(1):1-14. doi: 10.1007/s10802-012-9659-y.
10
Bifactor and item response theory analyses of interviewer report scales of cognitive impairment in schizophrenia.精神分裂症认知障碍访谈报告量表的双因素和项目反应理论分析。
Psychol Assess. 2011 Mar;23(1):245-61. doi: 10.1037/a0021501.

研究综述:儿童和青少年精神病理学诊断中的多信息源整合

Research Review: Multi-informant integration in child and adolescent psychopathology diagnosis.

作者信息

Martel Michelle M, Markon Kristian, Smith Gregory T

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.

出版信息

J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2017 Feb;58(2):116-128. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12611. Epub 2016 Aug 5.

DOI:10.1111/jcpp.12611
PMID:27492280
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5247337/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

An empirically based, clinically usable approach to cross-informant integration in clinical assessment is needed. Although the importance of this ongoing issue is becoming increasingly recognized, little in the way of solid recommendations is currently provided to researchers and clinicians seeking to incorporate multiple informant reports in diagnosis of child psychopathology. The issue is timely because recent developments have created new opportunities for improved handling of this problem. For example, advanced theories of psychopathology and normal and abnormal child development provide theoretical guidance for how integration of multiple informants should be handled for specific disorders and at particular ages. In addition, more sophisticated data analytic approaches are now available, including advanced latent variable models, which allow for complex measurement approaches with consideration of measurement invariance.

FINDINGS

The increasing availability and mobility of computing devices suggests that it will be increasingly feasible for clinicians to implement more advanced methods rather than being confined to the easily memorized algorithms of the DSM system.

CONCLUSIONS

Development of models of cross-informant integration for individual disorders based on theory and tests of the incremental validity of more sophisticated cross-informant integration approaches in comparison to external validation criteria (e.g. longitudinal trajectories and outcomes, treatment response, and behavior genetic etiology) should be a focus of future work.

摘要

背景

临床评估中基于经验且具有临床实用性的跨信息提供者整合方法是必要的。尽管这个持续存在的问题的重要性日益得到认可,但目前几乎没有为寻求在儿童精神病理学诊断中纳入多信息提供者报告的研究人员和临床医生提供可靠的建议。这个问题很及时,因为最近的进展为更好地处理这个问题创造了新机会。例如,精神病理学以及正常和异常儿童发展的先进理论为针对特定障碍和特定年龄段应如何处理多信息提供者的整合提供了理论指导。此外,现在有了更复杂的数据分析方法,包括先进的潜在变量模型,其允许在考虑测量不变性的情况下采用复杂的测量方法。

研究结果

计算设备可用性和移动性的不断提高表明,临床医生越来越有可能实施更先进的方法,而不是局限于DSM系统中易于记忆的算法。

结论

基于理论开发针对个体障碍的跨信息提供者整合模型,并测试与外部验证标准(如纵向轨迹和结果以及治疗反应和行为遗传病因)相比更复杂的跨信息提供者整合方法的增量效度,应成为未来工作的重点。