• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种整合多个信息提供者评分的三因素模型。

A trifactor model for integrating ratings across multiple informants.

作者信息

Bauer Daniel J, Howard Andrea L, Baldasaro Ruth E, Curran Patrick J, Hussong Andrea M, Chassin Laurie, Zucker Robert A

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

Psychol Methods. 2013 Dec;18(4):475-93. doi: 10.1037/a0032475. Epub 2013 Sep 30.

DOI:10.1037/a0032475
PMID:24079932
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3964937/
Abstract

Psychologists often obtain ratings for target individuals from multiple informants such as parents or peers. In this article we propose a trifactor model for multiple informant data that separates target-level variability from informant-level variability and item-level variability. By leveraging item-level data, the trifactor model allows for examination of a single trait rated on a single target. In contrast to many psychometric models developed for multitrait-multimethod data, the trifactor model is predominantly a measurement model. It is used to evaluate item quality in scale development, test hypotheses about sources of target variability (e.g., sources of trait differences) versus informant variability (e.g., sources of rater bias), and generate integrative scores that are purged of the subjective biases of single informants.

摘要

心理学家常常从多个信息提供者(如父母或同龄人)那里获取对目标个体的评分。在本文中,我们提出了一个针对多信息提供者数据的三因素模型,该模型将目标层面的变异性与信息提供者层面的变异性以及项目层面的变异性区分开来。通过利用项目层面的数据,三因素模型能够对在单个目标上评定的单一特质进行考察。与许多为多特质-多方法数据开发的心理测量模型不同,三因素模型主要是一个测量模型。它用于在量表开发中评估项目质量,检验关于目标变异性来源(如特质差异的来源)与信息提供者变异性来源(如评分者偏差的来源)的假设,并生成消除了单个信息提供者主观偏差的综合分数。

相似文献

1
A trifactor model for integrating ratings across multiple informants.一种整合多个信息提供者评分的三因素模型。
Psychol Methods. 2013 Dec;18(4):475-93. doi: 10.1037/a0032475. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
2
Trifactor Models for Multiple-Ratings Data.三因子模型在多评分数据中的应用
Multivariate Behav Res. 2019 May-Jun;54(3):360-381. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2018.1530091. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
3
Combined Approach to Multi-Informant Data Using Latent Factors and Latent Classes: Trifactor Mixture Model.使用潜在因素和潜在类别处理多信息源数据的联合方法:三因素混合模型
Educ Psychol Meas. 2021 Aug;81(4):728-755. doi: 10.1177/0013164420973722. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
4
Examining the Performance of the Trifactor Model for Multiple Raters.评估多评分者的三因素模型的性能。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2022 Jan;46(1):53-67. doi: 10.1177/01466216211051728. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
5
Psychometrically Informed Approach to Integration of Multiple Informant Ratings in Adult ADHD in a Community-Recruited Sample.采用心理计量学方法整合社区招募样本中成年 ADHD 的多种来源评定。
Assessment. 2017 Apr;24(3):279-289. doi: 10.1177/1073191116646443. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
6
Multilevel multitrait-multimethod latent analysis of structurally different and interchangeable raters of school climate.对学校氛围结构不同且可互换的评估者进行多层次多特质-多方法潜在分析。
Psychol Assess. 2015 Sep;27(3):1097-109. doi: 10.1037/pas0000098. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
7
Agreement of informants on emotional and behavioral problems from childhood to adulthood.从儿童期到成年期,信息提供者对情绪和行为问题的一致性。
Psychol Assess. 2012 Jun;24(2):293-300. doi: 10.1037/a0025500. Epub 2011 Sep 19.
8
Multi-informant universal screening: Evaluation of rater, item, and construct variance using a trifactor model.多 informant 通用筛查:使用三因素模型评估评分者、项目和结构方差。
J Sch Psychol. 2019 Dec;77:52-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2019.09.005. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
9
A new approach to integrating data from multiple informants in psychiatric assessment and research: mixing and matching contexts and perspectives.一种在精神病学评估与研究中整合来自多个信息提供者数据的新方法:混合与匹配背景及观点。
Am J Psychiatry. 2003 Sep;160(9):1566-77. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.9.1566.
10
The Bayesian Multilevel Trifactor Item Response Theory Model.贝叶斯多级三因素项目反应理论模型
Educ Psychol Meas. 2019 Jun;79(3):462-494. doi: 10.1177/0013164418806694. Epub 2018 Nov 17.

引用本文的文献

1
A Trifactor Model Approach to Understand School-Aged Children's Psychosocial Adjustment: Integrating Father, Mother, and Teacher Perspectives.一种理解学龄儿童心理社会适应的三因素模型方法:整合父亲、母亲和教师的观点。
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2025 Sep 11. doi: 10.1007/s10578-025-01909-0.
2
Dealing with missing data in multi-informant studies: A comparison of approaches.多来源研究中缺失数据的处理:方法比较。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Oct;56(7):6498-6519. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02367-7. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
3
Prosocial and externalizing behaviors in children raised by different-and same-gender parent families: new directions in parenting research.

本文引用的文献

1
Modeling Common Traits and Method Effects in Multitrait-Multimethod Analysis.多特质-多方法分析中常见特质与方法效应的建模
Multivariate Behav Res. 2010 Jan 29;45(1):45-72. doi: 10.1080/00273170903504729.
2
Investigating the Nature of Method Factors Through Multiple Informants: Evidence for a Specific Factor?通过多位信息提供者调查方法因素的本质:是否存在特定因素的证据?
Multivariate Behav Res. 2011 Jul 29;46(4):625-42. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2011.589272.
3
A comparison of four approaches to account for method effects in latent state-trait analyses.
不同性别和同性别的父母家庭养育的孩子的亲社会行为和外化行为:育儿研究的新方向。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 15;14:1325156. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1325156. eCollection 2023.
4
Systematic Integration of Multi-Informant Externalizing Ratings in Clinical Settings.系统整合临床环境下多来源外化评定信息。
Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2024 Apr;52(4):635-644. doi: 10.1007/s10802-023-01119-z. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
5
Are Discrepancies Between Father and Adolescent Perceptions of Harsh Parenting and Conflict Associated with Adolescent Mental Health Symptoms?父亲和青少年对严厉教养和冲突的看法存在差异是否与青少年心理健康症状有关?
J Youth Adolesc. 2023 Dec;52(12):2578-2591. doi: 10.1007/s10964-023-01842-2. Epub 2023 Aug 26.
6
Measuring the reliability of proxy respondents in behavioural assessments: an open question.代理应答者在行为评估中可靠性的衡量:一个开放性问题。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2023 Oct;35(10):2173-2190. doi: 10.1007/s40520-023-02501-z. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
7
Parenting in the Context of the Child: Genetic and Social Processes.儿童背景下的养育:遗传与社会过程。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2022 Mar;87(1-3):7-188. doi: 10.1111/mono.12460.
8
Harmonizing Social, Emotional, and Behavioral Constructs in Prevention Science: Digging into the Weeds of Aligning Disparate Measures.协调预防科学中的社会、情感和行为结构:深入探讨使不同措施一致的问题。
Prev Sci. 2023 Nov;24(8):1581-1594. doi: 10.1007/s11121-022-01467-0. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
9
Multi-informant Assessment of Internalizing Concerns: Rater Concordance and Implications for Decision-Making.内化问题的多信息源评估:评分者一致性及其对决策的影响。
J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2023;45(1):234-246. doi: 10.1007/s10862-023-10026-y. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
10
Multi-Informant Ratings of Childhood Limited Prosocial Emotions: Mother, Father, and Teacher Perspectives.多 informant 对儿童有限亲社会情绪的评价:母亲、父亲和教师的观点。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2023 Jan-Feb;52(1):119-133. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2022.2151452. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
四种方法在潜在状态-特质分析中对方法效应进行归因的比较。
Psychol Methods. 2012 Jun;17(2):255-83. doi: 10.1037/a0026977. Epub 2012 Feb 6.
4
An internalizing pathway to alcohol use and disorder.内化途径导致酒精使用障碍。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2011 Sep;25(3):390-404. doi: 10.1037/a0024519.
5
Generalized full-information item bifactor analysis.广义全信息项目双因素分析。
Psychol Methods. 2011 Sep;16(3):221-48. doi: 10.1037/a0023350.
6
Bifactor and item response theory analyses of interviewer report scales of cognitive impairment in schizophrenia.精神分裂症认知障碍访谈报告量表的双因素和项目反应理论分析。
Psychol Assess. 2011 Mar;23(1):245-61. doi: 10.1037/a0021501.
7
Commentary: Definitely more than measurement error: but how should we understand and deal with informant discrepancies?述评:肯定不只是测量误差:但我们应如何理解和处理信息提供者之间的差异?
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2011;40(1):80-6. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2011.533416.
8
Introduction to the special section: More than measurement error: Discovering meaning behind informant discrepancies in clinical assessments of children and adolescents.特刊介绍:不只是测量误差:在儿童和青少年的临床评估中发现信息提供者差异背后的意义。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2011;40(1):1-9. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2011.533405.
9
Ensuring Positiveness of the Scaled Difference Chi-square Test Statistic.确保尺度差异卡方检验统计量的正值性。
Psychometrika. 2010 Jun;75(2):243-248. doi: 10.1007/s11336-009-9135-y.
10
Measuring patients' views: a bifactor model of distinct patient-reported outcomes in psychosis.测量患者观点:精神病中不同患者报告结局的双因子模型。
Psychol Med. 2011 Feb;41(2):277-89. doi: 10.1017/S0033291710000784. Epub 2010 Apr 21.