Chan Meingold Hiu-Ming, Feng Xin, Gong Yihui, Inboden Karis
University of British Columbia.
The Ohio State University.
Res Sq. 2024 Sep 2:rs.3.rs-4870307. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4870307/v1.
For decades, parental report was used to assess children's psychological symptoms and social problems. The Berkeley Puppet Interview (BPI) utilizes hand puppets to collect questionnaire-style data from children, allowing consideration of children's own perspective. The current longitudinal study compared the feasibility and reliability of preschoolers' self-report with BPI at age 4 ( = 4.03, =0.16; 52% boy, 82% White American) and 5 ( = 5.22, = 0.36; 51% boy, 85% White American) as well as cross-informant agreement among children, mothers (74% above college education), alternate caregivers (>90% biological fathers), and coders. Children completed symptomatology, social, and parenting scales of BPI and their parents completed surveys assessing similar constructs. Our findings revealed both similarities and changes across ages. Specifically, the reliability and cross-informant agreement of the broad symptomatology and parenting scales were promising at both timepoints; however, 4-year-olds showed lower internal consistency in social scales.
几十年来,家长报告一直被用于评估儿童的心理症状和社会问题。伯克利木偶访谈(BPI)利用手偶从儿童那里收集问卷式数据,从而能够考虑儿童自己的观点。当前的纵向研究比较了4岁(平均年龄 = 4.03,标准差 = 0.16;52%为男孩,82%为美国白人)和5岁(平均年龄 = 5.22,标准差 = 0.36;51%为男孩,85%为美国白人)的学龄前儿童自我报告与BPI的可行性和可靠性,以及儿童、母亲(74%受过大学以上教育)、替代照料者(超过90%为亲生父亲)和编码员之间的多源信息一致性。儿童完成了BPI的症状学、社会和养育方面的量表,其父母完成了评估类似结构的调查。我们的研究结果揭示了不同年龄之间的异同。具体而言,在两个时间点上,广泛的症状学和养育量表的可靠性及多源信息一致性都很可观;然而,4岁儿童在社会量表上的内部一致性较低。