Suppr超能文献

腹部疝修补术后的手术入路和长期复发。

Surgical Approach and Long-Term Recurrence After Ventral Hernia Repair.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

Center for Healthcare Outcomes & Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

出版信息

JAMA Surg. 2024 Sep 1;159(9):1019-1028. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.1696.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The prevalence of robotic-assisted anterior abdominal wall (ventral) hernia repair has increased dramatically in recent years, despite conflicting evidence of patient benefit. Whether long-term hernia recurrence rates following robotic-assisted repairs are lower than rates following more established laparoscopic or open approaches remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and open approaches to ventral hernia repair and long-term operative hernia recurrence.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Secondary retrospective cohort analysis using Medicare claims data examining adults 18 years and older who underwent elective inpatient ventral, incisional, or umbilical hernia repair from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2020. Data analysis was performed from January 2023 through March 2024.

EXPOSURE

Operative approach to ventral hernia repair, which included robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and open approaches.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was operative hernia recurrence for up to 10 years after initial hernia repair. To help account for potential bias from unmeasured patient factors (eg, hernia size), an instrumental variable analysis was performed using regional variation in the adoption of robotic-assisted hernia repair over time as the instrument. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to estimate the risk-adjusted cumulative incidence of operative recurrence up to 10 years after the initial procedure, controlling for factors such as patient age, sex, race and ethnicity, comorbidities, and hernia subtype (ventral/incisional or umbilical).

RESULTS

A total of 161 415 patients were included in the study; mean (SD) patient age was 69 (10.8) years and 67 592 patients (41.9%) were male. From 2010 to 2020, the proportion of robotic-assisted procedures increased from 2.1% (415 of 20 184) to 21.9% (1737 of 7945), while the proportion of laparoscopic procedures decreased from 23.8% (4799 of 20 184) to 11.9% (946 of 7945) and of open procedures decreased from 74.2% (14 970 of 20 184) to 66.2% (5262 of 7945). Patients undergoing robotic-assisted hernia repair had a higher 10-year risk-adjusted cumulative incidence of operative recurrence (13.43%; 95% CI, 13.36%-13.50%) compared with both laparoscopic (12.33%; 95% CI, 12.30%-12.37%; HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62-0.94) and open (12.74%; 95% CI, 12.71%-12.78%; HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.64-0.97) approaches. These trends were directionally consistent regardless of surgeon procedure volume.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study found that the rate of long-term operative recurrence was higher for patients undergoing robotic-assisted ventral hernia repair compared with laparoscopic and open approaches. This suggests that narrowing clinical applications and evaluating the specific advantages and disadvantages of each approach may improve patient outcomes following ventral hernia repairs.

摘要

重要性

近年来,尽管患者获益的证据存在冲突,但机器人辅助前腹壁(腹侧)疝修补术的流行率却大幅上升。机器人辅助修复与更成熟的腹腔镜或开放式方法相比,长期疝复发率是否较低仍不清楚。

目的

评估机器人辅助、腹腔镜和开放式方法治疗腹侧疝修补术与长期手术疝复发之间的关系。

设计、设置和参与者:使用 Medicare 索赔数据进行二次回顾性队列分析,研究对象为 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日期间接受择期住院腹侧、切口或脐疝修补术的 18 岁及以上成年人。数据分析于 2023 年 1 月至 2024 年 3 月进行。

暴露

腹侧疝修复的手术方法,包括机器人辅助、腹腔镜和开放式。

主要结果和测量

主要结果是初始疝修复后长达 10 年的手术疝复发。为了帮助解释未测量的患者因素(例如疝大小)的潜在偏差,使用随着时间的推移机器人辅助疝修复采用的区域变化作为工具进行了工具变量分析。使用 Cox 比例风险建模来估计初始手术后长达 10 年的风险调整累积复发率,控制患者年龄、性别、种族和民族、合并症和疝亚型(腹侧/切口或脐疝)等因素。

结果

共有 161415 名患者纳入研究;患者平均(SD)年龄为 69(10.8)岁,67592 名患者(41.9%)为男性。从 2010 年到 2020 年,机器人辅助手术的比例从 2.1%(20184 例中的 415 例)增加到 21.9%(7945 例中的 1737 例),而腹腔镜手术的比例从 23.8%(20184 例中的 4799 例)减少到 11.9%(7945 例中的 946 例),开放手术的比例从 74.2%(20184 例中的 14970 例)减少到 66.2%(7945 例中的 5262 例)。与腹腔镜(12.33%;95%CI,12.30%-12.37%;HR,0.78;95%CI,0.62-0.94)和开放(12.74%;95%CI,12.71%-12.78%;HR,0.81;95%CI,0.64-0.97)方法相比,接受机器人辅助疝修复的患者 10 年风险调整累积复发率更高(13.43%;95%CI,13.36%-13.50%)。无论外科医生的手术量如何,这些趋势都是一致的。

结论和相关性

本研究发现,与腹腔镜和开放式方法相比,接受机器人辅助腹侧疝修复的患者长期手术复发率更高。这表明缩小临床应用范围并评估每种方法的具体优缺点可能会改善腹侧疝修复后的患者结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/febd/11170458/08c3854ab206/jamasurg-e241696-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验