Nyweide David J, Bynum Julie P W
Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Baltimore, MD.
Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH.
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Apr;69(4):407-415.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.06.027. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
We determine whether visit patterns indicative of higher continuity are related to a lower risk of presenting at the emergency department (ED) among older adults.
This study was a survival analysis between 2011 and 2013 of a 20% random sample of fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries aged 66 years or older. Ambulatory visit patterns were measured starting in 2011 for up to 24 months using 2 continuity metrics measured on a 0 to 1 scale-Continuity of Care (COC) score and the Usual Provider Continuity (UPC) score. The composite outcome of an ED episode was defined as occurrence of an ED visit with discharge home, an observation stay, or hospital admission. Time-dependent Cox proportional hazards regression models controlled for patient demographic characteristics, comorbidities, previous use, and regional factors, with censoring for death or occurrence of the composite outcome. In a secondary analysis, continuity was measured in the 12 months preceding an ED episode to test whether it was associated with type of ED episode.
The relative rate of ED episodes decreased approximately 1% for every 0.1-point increase in the COC score (adjusted hazard ratio 0.99; 95% confidence interval 0.99 to 0.99; P<.001) and 2% for every 0.1-point increase in the UPC score (adjusted hazard ratio 0.98; 95% CI 0.98 to 0.99; P<.001), or up to a 10% lower rate between the lowest and highest COC score and a 20% lower rate for the UPC score. Among beneficiaries with an ED episode, higher continuity was associated with a 1% lower risk of observation stay but a 3% to 4% higher risk of hospital admission relative to an ED visit with discharge home.
Ambulatory visit patterns exhibiting more continuity were associated with a lower rate of ED utilization for older adults with fee-for-service Medicare coverage. The association of higher continuity with lower risk of ED use but differences in outcome when an ED visit does occur may reflect more appropriate referral to the ED when outpatient management is no longer adequate.
我们确定在老年人中,表明更高连续性的就诊模式是否与较低的急诊就诊风险相关。
本研究是对2011年至2013年期间66岁及以上按服务收费的医疗保险受益人的20%随机样本进行的生存分析。从2011年开始,使用在0至1范围内测量的2个连续性指标——医疗连续性(COC)评分和常规医疗服务提供者连续性(UPC)评分,对长达24个月的门诊就诊模式进行测量。急诊事件的复合结局定义为发生急诊就诊并出院回家、观察住院或住院治疗。时间依赖性Cox比例风险回归模型对患者人口统计学特征、合并症、既往使用情况和区域因素进行了控制,并对死亡或复合结局的发生进行了删失处理。在一项次要分析中,在急诊事件发生前的12个月内测量连续性,以测试其是否与急诊事件的类型相关。
COC评分每增加0.1分,急诊事件的相对发生率下降约1%(调整后的风险比为0.99;95%置信区间为0.99至0.99;P<0.001),UPC评分每增加0.1分,急诊事件的相对发生率下降2%(调整后的风险比为0.98;95%置信区间为0.98至0.99;P<0.001),即COC评分最低和最高之间的发生率降低高达10%,UPC评分降低20%。在发生急诊事件的受益人中,相对于出院回家的急诊就诊,更高的连续性与观察住院风险降低1%相关,但与住院治疗风险增加3%至4%相关。
对于有按服务收费医疗保险覆盖的老年人,表现出更高连续性的门诊就诊模式与较低的急诊利用率相关。更高的连续性与较低的急诊使用风险相关,但在确实发生急诊就诊时结局存在差异,这可能反映出在门诊管理不再充分时更合适地转诊至急诊。