Suppr超能文献

视觉搜索中的内隐物体命名:来自语音竞争的证据。

Implicit object naming in visual search: Evidence from phonological competition.

作者信息

Walenchok Stephen C, Hout Michael C, Goldinger Stephen D

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, P.O. Box 871104, Tempe, AZ, 85287-1104, USA.

New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, USA.

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Nov;78(8):2633-2654. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1184-6.

Abstract

During visual search, people are distracted by objects that visually resemble search targets; search is impaired when targets and distractors share overlapping features. In this study, we examined whether a nonvisual form of similarity, overlapping object names, can also affect search performance. In three experiments, people searched for images of real-world objects (e.g., a beetle) among items whose names either all shared the same phonological onset (/bi/), or were phonologically varied. Participants either searched for 1 or 3 potential targets per trial, with search targets designated either visually or verbally. We examined standard visual search (Experiments 1 and 3) and a self-paced serial search task wherein participants manually rejected each distractor (Experiment 2). We hypothesized that people would maintain visual templates when searching for single targets, but would rely more on object names when searching for multiple items and when targets were verbally cued. This reliance on target names would make performance susceptible to interference from similar-sounding distractors. Experiments 1 and 2 showed the predicted interference effect in conditions with high memory load and verbal cues. In Experiment 3, eye-movement results showed that phonological interference resulted from small increases in dwell time to all distractors. The results suggest that distractor names are implicitly activated during search, slowing attention disengagement when targets and distractors share similar names.

摘要

在视觉搜索过程中,人们会被视觉上类似于搜索目标的物体分散注意力;当目标和干扰物具有重叠特征时,搜索就会受到影响。在本研究中,我们考察了一种非视觉形式的相似性,即重叠的物体名称,是否也会影响搜索性能。在三个实验中,人们在名称要么都具有相同语音起始(/bi/),要么语音不同的物品中搜索现实世界物体的图像(例如甲虫)。参与者每次试验要么搜索1个要么搜索3个潜在目标,搜索目标通过视觉或语言指定。我们考察了标准视觉搜索(实验1和3)以及一项自定节奏的序列搜索任务,其中参与者手动排除每个干扰物(实验2)。我们假设,人们在搜索单个目标时会保持视觉模板,但在搜索多个目标以及目标通过语言提示时会更多地依赖物体名称。这种对目标名称的依赖会使表现容易受到发音相似的干扰物的影响。实验1和2在高记忆负荷和语言提示的条件下显示出了预期的干扰效应。在实验3中,眼动结果表明,语音干扰是由于对所有干扰物的注视时间略有增加所致。结果表明,在搜索过程中干扰物的名称会被隐性激活,当目标和干扰物名称相似时会减缓注意力的脱离。

相似文献

1
Implicit object naming in visual search: Evidence from phonological competition.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Nov;78(8):2633-2654. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1184-6.
2
Activation of phonological competitors in visual search.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2013 Jun;143(2):168-75. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.03.006. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
3
Implicitly perceived objects attract gaze during later free viewing.
J Vis. 2009 Jun 10;9(6):6.1-12. doi: 10.1167/9.6.6.
5
Foraging through multiple target categories reveals the flexibility of visual working memory.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Feb;183:108-115. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.12.005. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
6
Activation of distractor names in the picture-picture interference paradigm.
Mem Cognit. 2007 Apr;35(3):494-503. doi: 10.3758/bf03193289.
7
Running the figure to the ground: figure-ground segmentation during visual search.
Vision Res. 2014 Apr;97:65-73. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.02.005. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
8
Activation of new attentional templates for real-world objects in visual search.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 May;27(5):902-12. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00747. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
9
Visual search and foraging compared in a large-scale search task.
Cogn Process. 2008 May;9(2):121-6. doi: 10.1007/s10339-007-0200-0. Epub 2008 Jan 10.
10
The target effect: visual memory for unnamed search targets.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(11):2090-104. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.905611. Epub 2014 Apr 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Language is activated by visual input regardless of memory demands or capacity.
Cognition. 2022 May;222:104994. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104994. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
2
How a picture becomes a word: individual differences in the development of language-mediated visual search.
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 Jan 4;6(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00268-9.
3
Investigating the role of verbal templates in contingent capture by color.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Aug;81(6):1846-1879. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01701-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Failures of perception in the low-prevalence effect: Evidence from active and passive visual search.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Aug;41(4):977-94. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000053. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
3
Visual similarity is stronger than semantic similarity in guiding visual search for numbers.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Jun;21(3):689-95. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0547-4.
5
Activation of phonological competitors in visual search.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2013 Jun;143(2):168-75. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.03.006. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
6
Search for two categories of target produces fewer fixations to target-color items.
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2012 Dec;18(4):404-18. doi: 10.1037/a0031032.
8
Incidental learning speeds visual search by lowering response thresholds, not by improving efficiency: evidence from eye movements.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Feb;38(1):90-112. doi: 10.1037/a0023894. Epub 2011 May 16.
9
Learning in repeated visual search.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Jul;72(5):1267-82. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.5.1267.
10
Looking for meaning: eye movements are sensitive to overlapping semantic features, not association.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Oct;16(5):869-74. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.5.869.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验