Suppr超能文献

伯克利消费税对含糖饮料消费的影响。

Impact of the Berkeley Excise Tax on Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption.

作者信息

Falbe Jennifer, Thompson Hannah R, Becker Christina M, Rojas Nadia, McCulloch Charles E, Madsen Kristine A

机构信息

Jennifer Falbe, Hannah R. Thompson, Christina M. Becker, Nadia Rojas, and Kristine A. Madsen are with the School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley. Charles E. McCulloch is with the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2016 Oct;106(10):1865-71. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303362. Epub 2016 Aug 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the impact of the excise tax on sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption in Berkeley, California, which became the first US jurisdiction to implement such a tax ($0.01/oz) in March 2015.

METHODS

We used a repeated cross-sectional design to examine changes in pre- to posttax beverage consumption in low-income neighborhoods in Berkeley versus in the comparison cities of Oakland and San Francisco, California. A beverage frequency questionnaire was interviewer administered to 990 participants before the tax and 1689 after the tax (approximately 8 months after the vote and 4 months after implementation) to examine relative changes in consumption.

RESULTS

Consumption of SSBs decreased 21% in Berkeley and increased 4% in comparison cities (P = .046). Water consumption increased more in Berkeley (+63%) than in comparison cities (+19%; P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Berkeley's excise tax reduced SSB consumption in low-income neighborhoods. Evaluating SSB taxes in other cities will improve understanding of their public health benefit and their generalizability.

摘要

目的

评估消费税对加利福尼亚州伯克利市含糖饮料(SSB)消费的影响,该市于2015年3月成为美国首个实施此类税收(每盎司0.01美元)的辖区。

方法

我们采用重复横断面设计,研究伯克利市低收入社区与加利福尼亚州奥克兰市和旧金山这两个对照城市在征税前后饮料消费的变化。在征税前对990名参与者、征税后(投票后约8个月和实施后4个月)对1689名参与者进行了访谈式饮料频率问卷调查,以研究消费的相对变化。

结果

伯克利市的含糖饮料消费量下降了21%,而对照城市则增加了4%(P = 0.046)。伯克利市的水消费量增加幅度(+63%)大于对照城市(+19%;P < 0.01)。

结论

伯克利市的消费税降低了低收入社区的含糖饮料消费量。评估其他城市的含糖饮料税将有助于更好地理解其对公共健康的益处及其推广性。

相似文献

1
Impact of the Berkeley Excise Tax on Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption.
Am J Public Health. 2016 Oct;106(10):1865-71. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303362. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
3
Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption 3 Years After the Berkeley, California, Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax.
Am J Public Health. 2019 Apr;109(4):637-639. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.304971. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
4
Higher Retail Prices of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages 3 Months After Implementation of an Excise Tax in Berkeley, California.
Am J Public Health. 2015 Nov;105(11):2194-201. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302881. Epub 2015 Oct 7.
5
Higher Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Retail Prices After Excise Taxes in Oakland and San Francisco.
Am J Public Health. 2020 Jul;110(7):1017-1023. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305602. Epub 2020 May 21.
7
City-Level Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes and Youth Body Mass Index Percentile.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2424822. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.24822.
8
Trends in beverage prices following the introduction of a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Barbados.
Prev Med. 2017 Dec;105S:S23-S25. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.07.013. Epub 2017 Jul 15.
9
Does the Mexican sugar-sweetened beverage tax have a signaling effect? ENSANUT 2016.
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 22;13(8):e0199337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199337. eCollection 2018.
10
Implementation of the First US Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax in Berkeley, CA, 2015-2019.
Am J Public Health. 2020 Sep;110(9):1429-1437. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305795. Epub 2020 Jul 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Beyond the Average: Trends in Extreme Sodium Intake in the U.S. Population, 2003-2018.
Nutrients. 2025 Jun 11;17(12):1975. doi: 10.3390/nu17121975.
2
A global call to action: strengthening strategies to combat dysglycemia and improve public health outcomes.
Front Public Health. 2025 May 30;13:1597128. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1597128. eCollection 2025.
5
Evaluation of the Soda Tax on Obesity and Diabetes in California: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
MDM Policy Pract. 2025 Jan 13;10(1):23814683241309669. doi: 10.1177/23814683241309669. eCollection 2025 Jan-Jun.
6
Prevention Strategies in Obesity Management: A Systematic Review Comparing Canadian and American Guidelines for Adults.
Cureus. 2024 Oct 15;16(10):e71550. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71550. eCollection 2024 Oct.
8
Effectiveness of implemented global dietary interventions: a scoping review of fiscal policies.
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 19;24(1):2552. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19988-4.
9
A scoping review of policies related to reducing energy drink consumption in children.
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 26;24(1):2308. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19724-y.

本文引用的文献

2
Changes in Prices After an Excise Tax to Sweetened Sugar Beverages Was Implemented in Mexico: Evidence from Urban Areas.
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 14;10(12):e0144408. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144408. eCollection 2015.
3
Evaluating the Health Impacts of Food and Beverage Taxes.
Curr Obes Rep. 2014 Dec;3(4):432-9. doi: 10.1007/s13679-014-0123-x.
4
Higher Retail Prices of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages 3 Months After Implementation of an Excise Tax in Berkeley, California.
Am J Public Health. 2015 Nov;105(11):2194-201. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302881. Epub 2015 Oct 7.
5
Cost Effectiveness of a Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Excise Tax in the U.S.
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Jul;49(1):112-23. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.03.004.
6
Cost Effectiveness of Childhood Obesity Interventions: Evidence and Methods for CHOICES.
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Jul;49(1):102-11. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.03.032.
8
Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011-2012.
JAMA. 2014 Feb 26;311(8):806-14. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.732.
10
A typology of beverage taxation: multiple approaches for obesity prevention and obesity prevention-related revenue generation.
J Public Health Policy. 2013 Aug;34(3):403-23. doi: 10.1057/jphp.2013.17. Epub 2013 May 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验