Bello Silvia M, Wallduck Rosalind, Dimitrijević Vesna, Živaljević Ivana, Stringer Chris B
Department of Earth Sciences, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, SW7 5BD, London, UK.
Laboratory for Bioarchaeology, Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Philosophy, 18-20 Čika Ljubina, 11000, Belgrade, Serbia.
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2016 Dec;161(4):722-743. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.23079. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
Humanly induced modifications on human and non-human bones from four archaeological sites of known funerary rituals (one interpreted as cannibalism and three interpreted as funerary defleshing and disarticulation after a period of decay) were analyzed to ascertain whether macromorphological and micromorphological characteristics of cut marks can be used to distinguish cannibalistic from secondary burial practices.
Four collections were analyzed: the Magdalenian assemblage from Gough's Cave (UK) and the Mesolithic-Neolithic bone samples from Lepenski Vir, Padina and Vlasac (Serbia). A total of 647 cut marks (345 on human and 302 on non-human remains) were imaged and measured using an optical surface measurement system, the Alicona InfiniteFocus, housed at the Natural History Museum (London, UK).
The frequency of cut marks at Gough's Cave exceeds 65%, while it is below 1% in the Serbian sites, and no human tooth marks and only one case of percussion damage have been observed on the three Serbian collections. The distribution of cut marks on human bones is comparable in the four assemblages. Cannibalized human remains, however, present a uniform cut mark distribution, which can be associated with disarticulation of persistent and labile articulations, and the scalping and filleting of muscles. For secondary burials where modification occurred after a period of decay, disarticulation marks are less common and the disarticulation of labile joints is rare. The micromorphometric analyses of cut marks on human and non-human remains suggest that cut marks produced when cleaning partially decayed bodies are significantly different from cut marks produced during butchery of fresh bodies.
A distinction between cannibalism and secondary treatment of human bodies can be made based on frequency, distribution and micromorphometric characteristics of cut marks.
分析来自四个已知丧葬仪式考古遗址的人类和非人类骨骼上人为造成的改变(其中一个被解释为食人行为,另外三个被解释为在尸体腐烂一段时间后进行的丧葬性去皮和关节分离),以确定切割痕迹的宏观形态和微观形态特征是否可用于区分食人行为和二次埋葬行为。
分析了四个样本集:来自英国高夫洞穴的马格德林时期组合以及来自塞尔维亚莱彭斯基维尔、帕迪纳和弗拉萨克的中石器时代至新石器时代的骨骼样本。使用位于英国伦敦自然历史博物馆的光学表面测量系统Alicona InfiniteFocus,对总共647处切割痕迹(345处位于人类遗骸上,302处位于非人类遗骸上)进行了成像和测量。
高夫洞穴的切割痕迹频率超过65%,而在塞尔维亚的遗址中该频率低于1%,并且在塞尔维亚的三个样本集中未观察到人类牙齿痕迹,仅发现一例撞击损伤。四个样本集中人类骨骼上切割痕迹的分布具有可比性。然而,被食人处理的人类遗骸呈现出均匀的切割痕迹分布,这可能与持久和易损关节的分离以及肌肉的剥皮和去骨有关。对于在尸体腐烂一段时间后进行改变的二次埋葬,关节分离痕迹较少见,易损关节的分离也很罕见。对人类和非人类遗骸上切割痕迹的微观形态测量分析表明,清理部分腐烂尸体时产生的切割痕迹与新鲜尸体屠宰时产生的切割痕迹有显著差异。
可以根据切割痕迹的频率、分布和微观形态特征区分食人行为和对人体的二次处理。