Ustundag-Budak Y, Sambel M, Alisik M, Aydos M, Erel O, Oner S, Demirbas M, Kilic M, Unal D
Department of Clinical Chemistry, Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital, Bursa, Turkey.
Department of Urology, Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital, Bursa, Turkey.
Andrologia. 2017 Sep;49(7). doi: 10.1111/and.12695. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
This study explored the use of thiol/disulphide homeostasis as a novel oxidative stress marker in patients with erectile dysfunction (ED). Fifty-five patients aged 40-57 were divided into two groups: Group I (International Index of Erectile Function [IIEF-5] score between 22 and 25, n = 20) and Group II (IIEF-5 score < 22, n = 35). Blood samples were used to evaluate hormone levels, lipid profile and thiol/disulphide levels. A novel, fully automated method measured plasma native thiol, total thiol and disulphide levels. Mean age, body mass index, total testosterone, HbA1c, triglyceride, atherogenic index (AIP) and total cholesterol levels did not significantly differ between Groups I and II (p > .05). IIEF-5 correlated weakly with native thiol level. Although non-statistically significant, native thiol (431 [SD: 105] μmol/L vs. 404 [110] μmol/L) and total thiol (426 [64] μmol/L vs. 41 [78] μmol/L) levels were lower in the ED group compared to the controls, and disulphide (14 [11] μmol/L vs. 18 [9] μmol/L) levels were higher. Mean disulphide/native thiol and mean disulphide/total thiol ratios did not statistically differ between groups. There was a weak positive correlation between AIP and total cholesterol/HDL and disulphide and disulphide/total thiol ratios. Thiol/disulphide haemostasis levels are not a single factor in ED pathophysiology but may contribute.
本研究探讨了硫醇/二硫键稳态作为勃起功能障碍(ED)患者一种新型氧化应激标志物的应用。55名年龄在40 - 57岁之间的患者被分为两组:第一组(国际勃起功能指数[IIEF - 5]评分在22至25之间,n = 20)和第二组(IIEF - 5评分<22,n = 35)。采集血样以评估激素水平、血脂谱和硫醇/二硫键水平。采用一种新型的全自动方法测量血浆天然硫醇、总硫醇和二硫键水平。第一组和第二组之间的平均年龄、体重指数、总睾酮、糖化血红蛋白、甘油三酯、致动脉粥样硬化指数(AIP)和总胆固醇水平无显著差异(p>0.05)。IIEF - 5与天然硫醇水平呈弱相关。虽然无统计学意义,但与对照组相比,ED组的天然硫醇(431[标准差:105]μmol/L对404[110]μmol/L)和总硫醇(426[64]μmol/L对41[78]μmol/L)水平较低,而二硫键(14[11]μmol/L对18[9]μmol/L)水平较高。两组之间的平均二硫键/天然硫醇和平均二硫键/总硫醇比值无统计学差异。AIP与总胆固醇/高密度脂蛋白以及二硫键和二硫键/总硫醇比值之间存在弱正相关。硫醇/二硫键稳态水平并非ED病理生理学中的单一因素,但可能有一定作用。