Nagpal Disha, Prakash Shobha, Bhat Kishore Gajanan, Singh Gagandeep
Department of Periodontics, College of Dental Sciences, Davangere, Karnataka, India.
Department of Microbiology, Karnataka, India; Department of Molecular Biology and Immunology, Maratha Mandal's NGH Institute of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Belgaum, Karnataka, India.
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2016 May-Jun;20(3):286-91. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.181247.
With the advent of DNA-based culture-independent techniques, a constantly growing number of Selenomonas phylotypes have been detected in patients with destructive periodontal diseases. However, the prevalence levels that have been determined in different studies vary considerably.
The present study was undertaken to detect and compare the presence of Selenomonas sputigena in the subgingival plaque samples from generalized aggressive periodontitis (GAP), chronic generalized periodontitis, and periodontally healthy patients using conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique.
A total of 90 patients were categorized as periodontally healthy individuals (Group I, n = 30), chronic generalized periodontitis (Group II, n = 30), and GAP (Group III, n = 30). The clinical parameters were recorded and subgingival plaque samples were collected. These were then subjected to conventional PCR analysis.
Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA test was used for multiple group comparisons followed by Mann-Whitney U-test for pairwise comparison.
On comparison between three groups, all the clinical parameters were found to be statistically highly significant. Comparing Groups I-II and I-III, the difference in detection was found to be statistically highly significant whereas in Groups II-III, it was statistically nonsignificant. On comparison of S. sputigena detected and undetected patients to clinical parameters in various study groups, the difference was found to be nonsignificant.
S. sputigena was found to be significantly associated with chronic and aggressive periodontitis. Although the difference in its detection frequency in both groups was statistically nonsignificant when compared clinically, S. sputigena was more closely associated with the GAP.
随着基于DNA的非培养技术的出现,在患有破坏性牙周疾病的患者中检测到的栖瘤胃菌系统型数量不断增加。然而,不同研究确定的患病率水平差异很大。
本研究旨在使用常规聚合酶链反应(PCR)技术检测并比较广泛侵袭性牙周炎(GAP)、慢性广泛性牙周炎和牙周健康患者龈下菌斑样本中栖瘤胃普氏菌的存在情况。
总共90名患者被分为牙周健康个体(第一组,n = 30)、慢性广泛性牙周炎(第二组,n = 30)和GAP(第三组,n = 30)。记录临床参数并收集龈下菌斑样本。然后对这些样本进行常规PCR分析。
采用Kruskal-Wallis方差分析检验进行多组比较,随后采用Mann-Whitney U检验进行两两比较。
在三组之间进行比较时,发现所有临床参数在统计学上均具有高度显著性。比较第一组与第二组以及第一组与第三组,检测差异在统计学上具有高度显著性,而在第二组与第三组中,差异在统计学上无显著性。在各个研究组中,将检测到和未检测到栖瘤胃普氏菌的患者与临床参数进行比较时,发现差异无显著性。
发现栖瘤胃普氏菌与慢性和侵袭性牙周炎显著相关。尽管在临床比较时两组中其检测频率的差异在统计学上无显著性,但栖瘤胃普氏菌与GAP的关联更为密切。