Watzlaf Valerie J M, Dealmeida Dilhari R, Zhou Leming, Hartman Linda M
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, SCHOOL OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATION SCIENCES, UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH, PITTSBURGH, PA, USA.
HEALTH SCIENCES LIBRARY SYSTEM, UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH, PITTSBURGH, PA, USA.
Int J Telerehabil. 2015 Nov 20;7(2):15-22. doi: 10.5195/ijt.2015.6186. eCollection 2015 Fall.
Healthcare professionals engaged in telehealth are faced with complex US federal regulations (e.g., HIPAA/HITECH) and could benefit from the guidance provided by best practices in Privacy and Security (P&S). This article describes a systematic review protocol to address this need. The protocol described herein uses the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P). The PRISMA-P contains 17 items that are considered essential, as well as minimum components to include in systematic reviews. PICOS (participants, interventions, comparisons, outcome(s) and study design of the systematic review) are also relevant to the development of best practices in P&S in telehealth systems. A systematic process can best determine what information should be included and how this information should be retrieved, condensed, analyzed, organized, and disseminated.
从事远程医疗的医疗保健专业人员面临着复杂的美国联邦法规（如《健康保险流通与责任法案》/《健康信息技术经济与临床健康法案》），并能从隐私与安全（P&S）最佳实践提供的指导中受益。本文描述了一项满足这一需求的系统评价方案。本文所述方案采用了系统评价与Meta分析方案的首选报告项目（PRISMA-P）。PRISMA-P包含17项被视为必不可少的项目，以及系统评价中应包含的最低限度组成部分。PICOS（系统评价的参与者、干预措施、对照、结局和研究设计）也与远程医疗系统中P&S最佳实践的制定相关。一个系统的过程能够最好地确定应纳入哪些信息以及应如何检索、提炼、分析、组织和传播这些信息。
