Student assessment: Moving over to programmatic assessment.
作者信息
Singh Tejinder
机构信息
CMCL-FAIMER Regional Institute, Christian Medical College, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
出版信息
Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2016 Jul-Sep;6(3):149-50. doi: 10.4103/2229-516X.186955.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Student assessment: Moving over to programmatic assessment.学生评估：转向基于课程的评估。
Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2016 Jul-Sep;6(3):149-50. doi: 10.4103/2229-516X.186955.
2
The impact of programmatic assessment on student learning: theory versus practice.程序化评估对学生学习的影响：理论与实践
Med Educ. 2015 May;49(5):487-98. doi: 10.1111/medu.12645.
3
Development of a comprehensive clinical performance assessment system for nursing students: A programmatic approach.护理专业学生综合临床能力评估体系的开发：一种系统性方法。
Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2016 Jan;13(1):46-54. doi: 10.1111/jjns.12085. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
4
Factors affecting compliance with moving and handling policy: Student nurses' views and experiences.影响遵守搬运和处理政策的因素：护生的观点和经验。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2010 Mar;10(2):96-100. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2009.03.020. Epub 2009 May 15.
5
Implementation of Portfolios as a Programmatic Global Assessment Measure in Dental Education.在牙科教育中实施档案袋作为一种系统性的全球评估手段。
J Dent Educ. 2018 Jun;82(6):557-564. doi: 10.21815/JDE.018.062.
6
Programmatic and teaching initiatives for ethnically diverse nursing students: a literature review.针对少数民族裔护理学生的计划性和教学举措：文献回顾。
Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2012 Jun;6(2):67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2012.05.005. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
7
Programmatic Assessment of Professionalism in Psychiatry Education: A Literature Review and Implementation Guide.精神科医学教育中专业精神的计划性评估：文献回顾与实施指南。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;989:217-233. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-57348-9_19.
8
A Comparison of Two Low-Stakes Methods for Administering a Program-Level Biology Concept Assessment.两种低风险方法用于进行课程层面生物学概念评估的比较
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2015 Dec 1;16(2):178-85. doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v16i2.953. eCollection 2015 Dec.
9
Validating graduate student programmatic outcomes.
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2011 Mar-Apr;32(2):107-9. doi: 10.5480/1536-5026-32.2.107.
10
Multiple-role mentoring: mentors' conceptualisations, enactments and role conflicts.多元角色指导：指导者的概念化、实施和角色冲突。
Med Educ. 2019 Jun;53(6):605-615. doi: 10.1111/medu.13811. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
引用本文的文献
1
The McNamara fallacy in medical education: Spot it, stop it.医学教育中的麦克纳马拉谬误：识别它，杜绝它。
J Postgrad Med. 2023 Jan-Mar;69(1):7-8. doi: 10.4103/jpgm.jpgm_765_22.
2
Changing Assessment Scenarios: Lessons for Changing Practice.不断变化的评估场景：改变实践的经验教训。
Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2021 Oct-Dec;11(4):206-213. doi: 10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_334_21. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
3
Item analysis of multiple choice questions: A quality assurance test for an assessment tool.多项选择题的项目分析：一种评估工具的质量保证测试。
Med J Armed Forces India. 2021 Feb;77(Suppl 1):S85-S89. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2020.11.007. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
4
Blended programmatic assessment for competency based curricula.基于能力的课程的混合式形成性评价。
J Postgrad Med. 2021 Jan-Mar;67(1):18-23. doi: 10.4103/jpgm.JPGM_1061_20.
5
The power of subjectivity in competency-based assessment.基于能力评估中主观性的影响力。
J Postgrad Med. 2020 Oct-Dec;66(4):200-205. doi: 10.4103/jpgm.JPGM_591_20.
本文引用的文献
1
The assessment of professional competence: Developments, research and practical implications.专业能力评估：发展、研究与实际影响。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 1996 Jan;1(1):41-67. doi: 10.1007/BF00596229.
2
Assessment in the post-psychometric era: learning to love the subjective and collective.后心理测量时代的评估：学会热爱主观和集体。
Med Teach. 2013 Jul;35(7):564-8. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.789134. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
3
Student assessment: issues and dilemmas regarding objectivity.学生评估：关于客观性的问题与困境
Natl Med J India. 2012 Sep-Oct;25(5):287-90.
4
Subjectivity and the valid assessment of pre-registration student nurse clinical learning outcomes: implications for mentors.主观性与注册前实习护士临床学习成果的有效评估：对带教老师的启示
Nurse Educ Today. 2009 Jan;29(1):33-9. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2008.06.006. Epub 2008 Aug 15.
5
Assessing professional competence: from methods to programmes.评估专业能力：从方法到方案。
Med Educ. 2005 Mar;39(3):309-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02094.x.
Zotero 插件