Suppr超能文献

高等教育中的伦理教学:使科学实践与伦理审议协调一致的原则推理的途径。

Ethics Teaching in Higher Education for Principled Reasoning: A Gateway for Reconciling Scientific Practice with Ethical Deliberation.

机构信息

Independent researcher and social sector consultant, Ankara, Turkey.

Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Jun;23(3):825-860. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9813-y. Epub 2016 Aug 26.

Abstract

This paper proposes laying the groundwork for principled moral reasoning as a seminal goal of ethics interventions in higher education, and on this basis, makes a case for educating future specialists and professionals with a foundation in philosophical ethics. Identification of such a seminal goal is warranted by (1) the progressive dissociation of scientific practice and ethical deliberation since the onset of a problematic relationship between science and ethics around the mid-19th century, and (2) the extensive mistrust of integrating ethics in science and engineering curricula beyond its "applied," "practical," or "professional" implications. Although calls by international scientific and educational bodies to strengthen ethics teaching in scientific education over the past quarter century have brought about a notion of combining competence in a certain field with competence in ethics, this is neither entrenched in the academic community, nor fleshed out as regards its core or instruments to realize it. The legitimate goals of ethics teaching in higher education, almost settled since the 1980s, can be subsumed under the proposed seminal goal, and the latter also would safeguard content and methods of ethics interventions against the intrusion of indoctrinative approaches. In this paper, derivation of the proposed seminal goal rests on an interpretation of the Kohlbergian cognitive-developmental conception of moral adulthood consisting in autonomous principled moral reasoning. This interpretation involves, based on Kant's conception of the virtuous person, integrating questions about the "good life" into the domain of principled reasoning.

摘要

本文提出将基于原则的道德推理作为高等教育中伦理干预的基本目标,并在此基础上,主张为未来的专家和专业人员提供哲学伦理基础的教育。这种基本目标的确定是有充分依据的:(1)自 19 世纪中期科学与伦理之间出现问题关系以来,科学实践与道德审议逐渐分离;(2)在科学和工程课程中广泛不信任将伦理整合到超出其“应用”、“实践”或“专业”含义的程度。尽管过去四分之一个世纪来,国际科学和教育机构呼吁加强科学教育中的伦理教学,将某一领域的能力与伦理能力相结合,但这既没有在学术界根深蒂固,也没有具体说明其核心或实现这一目标的手段。自 20 世纪 80 年代以来,高等教育中伦理教学的合理目标几乎已经确定,可以将其归入所提议的基本目标之下,而后者也将保护伦理干预的内容和方法免受灌输方法的影响。在本文中,所提出的基本目标的推导基于对柯尔伯格的道德成人认知发展概念的解释,即自主基于原则的道德推理。这种解释涉及基于康德的有德之人的概念,将关于“美好生活”的问题纳入基于原则的推理领域。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验