• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高等教育中的伦理教学:使科学实践与伦理审议协调一致的原则推理的途径。

Ethics Teaching in Higher Education for Principled Reasoning: A Gateway for Reconciling Scientific Practice with Ethical Deliberation.

机构信息

Independent researcher and social sector consultant, Ankara, Turkey.

Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Jun;23(3):825-860. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9813-y. Epub 2016 Aug 26.

DOI:10.1007/s11948-016-9813-y
PMID:27565151
Abstract

This paper proposes laying the groundwork for principled moral reasoning as a seminal goal of ethics interventions in higher education, and on this basis, makes a case for educating future specialists and professionals with a foundation in philosophical ethics. Identification of such a seminal goal is warranted by (1) the progressive dissociation of scientific practice and ethical deliberation since the onset of a problematic relationship between science and ethics around the mid-19th century, and (2) the extensive mistrust of integrating ethics in science and engineering curricula beyond its "applied," "practical," or "professional" implications. Although calls by international scientific and educational bodies to strengthen ethics teaching in scientific education over the past quarter century have brought about a notion of combining competence in a certain field with competence in ethics, this is neither entrenched in the academic community, nor fleshed out as regards its core or instruments to realize it. The legitimate goals of ethics teaching in higher education, almost settled since the 1980s, can be subsumed under the proposed seminal goal, and the latter also would safeguard content and methods of ethics interventions against the intrusion of indoctrinative approaches. In this paper, derivation of the proposed seminal goal rests on an interpretation of the Kohlbergian cognitive-developmental conception of moral adulthood consisting in autonomous principled moral reasoning. This interpretation involves, based on Kant's conception of the virtuous person, integrating questions about the "good life" into the domain of principled reasoning.

摘要

本文提出将基于原则的道德推理作为高等教育中伦理干预的基本目标,并在此基础上,主张为未来的专家和专业人员提供哲学伦理基础的教育。这种基本目标的确定是有充分依据的:(1)自 19 世纪中期科学与伦理之间出现问题关系以来,科学实践与道德审议逐渐分离;(2)在科学和工程课程中广泛不信任将伦理整合到超出其“应用”、“实践”或“专业”含义的程度。尽管过去四分之一个世纪来,国际科学和教育机构呼吁加强科学教育中的伦理教学,将某一领域的能力与伦理能力相结合,但这既没有在学术界根深蒂固,也没有具体说明其核心或实现这一目标的手段。自 20 世纪 80 年代以来,高等教育中伦理教学的合理目标几乎已经确定,可以将其归入所提议的基本目标之下,而后者也将保护伦理干预的内容和方法免受灌输方法的影响。在本文中,所提出的基本目标的推导基于对柯尔伯格的道德成人认知发展概念的解释,即自主基于原则的道德推理。这种解释涉及基于康德的有德之人的概念,将关于“美好生活”的问题纳入基于原则的推理领域。

相似文献

1
Ethics Teaching in Higher Education for Principled Reasoning: A Gateway for Reconciling Scientific Practice with Ethical Deliberation.高等教育中的伦理教学:使科学实践与伦理审议协调一致的原则推理的途径。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Jun;23(3):825-860. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9813-y. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
2
The effectiveness of ethics education: a quasi-experimental field study.伦理教育的效果:一项准实验现场研究。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Jun;19(2):545-68. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9349-0. Epub 2012 Jan 3.
3
Student-inspired activities for the teaching and learning of engineering ethics.以学生为主体的工程伦理教学活动
Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Dec;19(4):1455-68. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9297-8. Epub 2011 Jul 29.
4
Ethics education at NSF--commentary on "Standards for evaluating proposals to develop ethics curricula".美国国家科学基金会的伦理教育——评《伦理课程开发提案评估标准》
Sci Eng Ethics. 2005 Jul;11(3):509-11. doi: 10.1007/s11948-005-0021-4.
5
Teaching about good work by preparing well: designing online resources for ethics educators--commentary on "Moral pedagogy and practical ethics".通过做好准备来传授良好的工作:为伦理教育工作者设计在线资源——对《道德教学与实践伦理》的评论
Sci Eng Ethics. 2005 Jul;11(3):409-11. doi: 10.1007/s11948-005-0009-0.
6
Teaching virtue: pedagogical implications of moral psychology.传授美德:道德心理学的教育学意义。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2010 Sep;16(3):611-28. doi: 10.1007/s11948-009-9164-z. Epub 2009 Sep 1.
7
Standards for evaluating proposals to develop ethics curricula.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2005 Jul;11(3):501-7. doi: 10.1007/s11948-005-0020-5.
8
A Systematic Literature Review of US Engineering Ethics Interventions.美国工程伦理干预措施的系统文献综述
Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Apr;24(2):551-583. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9910-6. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
9
Teaching ethics in science and engineering: effective online education.科学与工程领域的伦理教学:有效的在线教育
Sci Eng Ethics. 2005 Jul;11(3):323-8. doi: 10.1007/s11948-005-0001-8.
10
A Pragmatic Approach to Ethical Decision-Making in Engineering Practice: Characteristics, Evaluation Criteria, and Implications for Instruction and Assessment.工程实践中伦理决策的务实方法:特点、评价标准及对教学和评估的启示。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Jun;23(3):663-679. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9826-6. Epub 2016 Oct 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Basing Science Ethics on Respect for Human Dignity.基于对人类尊严尊重的科学伦理。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Dec;22(6):1627-1647. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9731-4. Epub 2015 Nov 27.
2
The essential role of medical ethics education in achieving professionalism: the Romanell Report.医学伦理教育在实现专业精神方面的重要作用:罗曼内尔报告
Acad Med. 2015 Jun;90(6):744-52. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000715.
3
Beyond Ethical Frameworks: Using Moral Experimentation in the Engineering Ethics Classroom.超越伦理框架:在工程伦理课堂中运用道德实验
Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Dec;21(6):1637-56. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9614-0. Epub 2014 Nov 28.
4
Broadening ethics teaching in engineering: beyond the individualistic approach.拓宽工程伦理教学:超越个人主义方法。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2011 Jun;17(2):217-32. doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9205-7. Epub 2010 May 14.
5
A psychological model that integrates ethics in engineering education.一种将伦理融入工程教育的心理学模型。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2004 Apr;10(2):219-24. doi: 10.1007/s11948-004-0017-5.
6
"Mind the gaps": an empirical approach to engineering ethics, 1997-2001.“注意差距”:1997 - 2001年工程伦理的实证研究方法
Sci Eng Ethics. 2003 Oct;9(4):517-42. doi: 10.1007/s11948-003-0048-3.
7
Why must scientists become more ethically sensitive than they used to be?为什么科学家必须比过去更加具备伦理敏感性?
Science. 1998 Dec 4;282(5395):1813-4. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5395.1813.
8
Ethics and engineering courses at Delft University of Technology: contents, educational setup and experiences.代尔夫特理工大学的伦理与工程课程:内容、教育设置及经验
Sci Eng Ethics. 2001 Apr;7(2):267-82. doi: 10.1007/s11948-001-0048-0.
9
Introducing ethics and engineering: the case of Delft University of Technology.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2001 Apr;7(2):261-6. doi: 10.1007/s11948-001-0047-1.
10
Ethics and the responsibility of science. Background paper for the World Science Conference, Budapest June 26-July 1, 1999.伦理与科学的责任。1999年6月26日至7月1日于布达佩斯举行的世界科学大会背景文件。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2000 Jan;6(1):131-42. doi: 10.1007/s11948-000-0031-1.