Fernández E, Bersezio C, Bottner J, Avalos F, Godoy I, Inda D, Vildósola P, Saad Jrc, Oliveira O B, Martín J
Oper Dent. 2017 Jan/Feb;42(1):41-52. doi: 10.2341/15-335-C. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
The aim was to evaluate the color longevity after nine months of in-office bleaching with gel (6% hydrogen peroxide), to compare this to a control concentration of 35% in a split-mouth study model, and to assess the dental confidence and psychosocial impact on patients.
Twenty-seven patients were assessed at the nine-month recall. The bleaching procedure with 6% or 35% hydrogen peroxide gel was performed randomly in the upper hemi-arch of each patient. The color was measured at baseline and at one week, one month, and nine months after the procedure, using the Vita Easyshade spectrophotometer, the Vita classical shade guide organized by value, and Vita Bleach Guide 3DMaster. Moreover, two surveys, OHIP-Esthetics and PIDAQ, were used to assess the esthetic self-perception and psychosocial impact of the bleaching procedure. During the nine-month recall, the color was assessed before and after dental prophylaxis.
Twenty-seven patients participated in the nine-month recall. There was a significant difference in ΔE between the two groups at all times assessed (p<0.011). The ΔL, Δa, and Δb showed a difference between the two groups at all times assessed (p<0.038), except for ΔL from the baseline vs nine-month after prophylaxis value (p>0.20). There was no significant difference in ΔSGU at all times (p>0.05). There was a significant difference in OHIP-Esthetics and PIDAQ sums compared with baseline scores (p<0.03).
The two compounds remained effective at nine months, with a slight rebound of color, and maintained their objective color difference but not the subjective color difference. Patients were satisfied with the bleaching procedure, and this had a positive impact on esthetic perception and a positive psychosocial impact at the nine-month recall.
评估使用凝胶(6%过氧化氢)进行诊室漂白九个月后的颜色持久性,在一项双侧对照研究模型中与35%的对照浓度进行比较,并评估牙齿美观度以及对患者的心理社会影响。
在九个月的回访中对27名患者进行评估。每位患者的上颌半牙弓随机采用6%或35%过氧化氢凝胶进行漂白程序。使用Vita Easyshade分光光度计、按明度排列的Vita经典比色板以及Vita Bleach Guide 3DMaster在基线时、程序后一周、一个月和九个月时测量颜色。此外,使用两项调查,即OHIP-美学调查和PIDAQ调查,来评估漂白程序的美学自我认知和心理社会影响。在九个月的回访期间,在牙齿预防性治疗前后评估颜色。
27名患者参与了九个月的回访。在所有评估时间点,两组之间的ΔE均存在显著差异(p<0.011)。除了从基线到预防性治疗后九个月的ΔL值外(p>0.20),在所有评估时间点,ΔL、Δa和Δb在两组之间均显示出差异(p<0.038)。在所有时间点,ΔSGU均无显著差异(p>0.05)。与基线分数相比,OHIP-美学调查和PIDAQ总分存在显著差异(p<0.03)。
两种化合物在九个月时仍有效,颜色略有反弹,保持了客观颜色差异,但未保持主观颜色差异。患者对漂白程序感到满意,这对九个月回访时的美学感知有积极影响,并对心理社会产生积极影响。