Tadin Antonija, Galic Sara, Gavic Lidia
Department of Restorative Dental Medicine and Endodontics, Study of Dental Medicine, University of Split School of Medicine, 21000 Split, Croatia.
Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Clinical Hospital Centre Split, 21000 Split, Croatia.
Acta Stomatol Croat. 2023 Dec;57(4):300-315. doi: 10.15644/asc57/4/2.
The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of tooth whitening and the effects on satisfaction with whitening treatment and esthetic self-perception of over-the-counter tooth whitening products.
Fifty-six participants were randomly allocated to three groups based on the whitening product they used (toothpaste, pencil, or a combination of both). In this prospective study, alterations in tooth color were assessed using a spectrophotometer at three distinct time intervals (initial measurement, seven days, and 14 days after commencing the use of the whitening product). Simultaneously, the respondents were given the PIDAQ questionnaire to complete. Patient satisfaction with treatment characteristics (5-point Likert scale), and perception of side effects were assessed at the end of the study.
Participants who used the whitening pen either alone or in combination with whitening toothpaste showed significant improvements in tooth color and whiteness index at seven and 14 days compared to those who used whitening toothpaste alone (p≤0.001). No significant differences were found between products in overall satisfaction with treatment, perception of final tooth color, and treatment comfort. Furthermore, with the exception of the psychological influence factor after 14 days (p≤0.001), there were no significant differences in the PIDAQ questionnaire scores between the whitening products at the different time points. However, many respondents (16.6%) reported oral mucosal sensitivity and a higher percentage (27.8%) reported tooth sensitivity during whitening pen application.
The combination of whitening toothpaste and whitening pen, as well as the whitening pen alone, showed effective objective color change results, but home whitening procedures did not significantly affect participants' self-perceived satisfaction or psychosocial outcomes depending on the product used.
本研究的目的是调查非处方牙齿美白产品的美白效果以及对美白治疗满意度和审美自我认知的影响。
56名参与者根据所使用的美白产品(牙膏、笔或两者组合)被随机分为三组。在这项前瞻性研究中,使用分光光度计在三个不同时间间隔(开始使用美白产品后的初始测量、7天和14天)评估牙齿颜色的变化。同时,让受访者完成PIDAQ问卷。在研究结束时评估患者对治疗特征的满意度(5点李克特量表)和副作用感知。
与仅使用美白牙膏的参与者相比,单独使用美白笔或与美白牙膏联合使用的参与者在7天和14天时牙齿颜色和白度指数有显著改善(p≤0.001)。在对治疗的总体满意度、对最终牙齿颜色的感知和治疗舒适度方面,产品之间没有发现显著差异。此外,除了14天后的心理影响因素(p≤0.001)外,不同时间点的美白产品在PIDAQ问卷得分上没有显著差异。然而,许多受访者(16.6%)报告了口腔黏膜敏感,更高比例(27.8%)的受访者在使用美白笔时报告了牙齿敏感。
美白牙膏和美白笔的组合以及单独使用美白笔均显示出有效的客观颜色变化结果,但家庭美白程序根据所使用的产品不同,对参与者的自我感知满意度或心理社会结果没有显著影响。