患者对瘢痕形成的看法具有多维度:使用验证性因素分析对患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表(POSAS)的一项调查。

Patient opinion of scarring is multidimensional: An investigation of the POSAS with confirmatory factor analysis.

作者信息

DeJong Helen M, Phillips Michael, Edgar Dale W, Wood Fiona M

机构信息

Perth Scar and Pain Clinic, Mt Pleasant, 6153, WA, Australia; Medical Sciences, Edith Cowan Universtiy, Joondaplup, 6027, WA, Australia; Harry Perkins Institute for Medical Research, Nedlands, 6009, WA, Australia; Fiona Wood Foundation, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, 6150, WA, Australia; Burn Injury Research Unit, University of Western Australia, Crawley, 6009, WA, Australia.

Harry Perkins Institute for Medical Research, Nedlands, 6009, WA, Australia; Centre for Medical Research, University of Western Australia, Crawley, 6009, WA, Australia; Royal Perth Hospital, Perth 6000, WA, Australia.

出版信息

Burns. 2017 Feb;43(1):58-68. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2016.06.026. Epub 2016 Aug 28.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Scarring is a significant consequence for patients following a burn. Understanding how patients perceive the physiological scar and define scar severity may provide valuable information regarding how the scar influences quality of life after burn. The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale was the first scar assessment tool validated to include the patients' evaluation of the scars physical qualities, following a burn. Validation studies of this tool have previously been conducted for a discrete scar-site after burn. The aim of this study was to assess the structural validity of the POSAS to capture the patients' evaluation of the total area of burn scar(s).

METHOD

Statistical analysis was based on 508 completed POSAS forms from 358 patients. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used initially to identify the number of factors within the tool, then confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) using structural equation modelling explored areas of misfit within each factor and whether the model provided a predicable structure to capture patient perception of scar severity.

RESULTS/DISCUSSION: The CFA analysis confirmed that a two dimensional model was superior to a unidimensional model when assessing the patient opinion of their total burn scar. The two dimensions were the physical scar (color, stiffness, thickness and irregularity) and the sensory scar (pain and itch). Further strain analysis of the two factor model identified additional domains. Independent factors influenced the perception of color forming a separate subdomain within the physical domain. Color is a visual characteristic, whereas the other three are predominantly tactile characteristics. A significant relationship between thickness and irregularity suggested they may form another subdomain, however further research is required to confirm this. Both pain and itch were recognized as independent, multidimensional latent variables, which require assessment tools with multidimensional structures.

CONCLUSIONS

When assessing the entire burn scar, three independent dimensions influence patient perception: (1) the physical scar, (2) pain and (3) itch. Within the physical domain, color formed a visual subdomain separate to a tactile subdomain. Further development of these domains within a high-order multi-dimensional structure is recommended.

摘要

引言

瘢痕形成是烧伤患者面临的一个重要问题。了解患者如何看待生理性瘢痕以及如何界定瘢痕严重程度,可能会为瘢痕如何影响烧伤后的生活质量提供有价值的信息。患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表(POSAS)是首个经验证的瘢痕评估工具,纳入了患者对烧伤后瘢痕物理特性的评价。此前已针对烧伤后的单个瘢痕部位对该工具进行了验证研究。本研究的目的是评估POSAS在获取患者对烧伤瘢痕总面积评价方面的结构效度。

方法

统计分析基于358例患者填写完整的508份POSAS表格。最初采用探索性因子分析(EFA)来确定该工具中的因子数量,然后使用结构方程模型进行验证性因子分析(CFA),以探究每个因子内的不匹配区域,以及该模型是否提供了一个可预测的结构来获取患者对瘢痕严重程度的认知。

结果/讨论:CFA分析证实,在评估患者对其整个烧伤瘢痕的看法时,二维模型优于一维模型。这两个维度分别是生理性瘢痕(颜色、硬度、厚度和不规则度)和感觉性瘢痕(疼痛和瘙痒)。对双因子模型的进一步应变分析确定了其他领域。独立因子影响对颜色的认知,在生理领域内形成一个单独的子域。颜色是一种视觉特征,而其他三个主要是触觉特征。厚度和不规则度之间存在显著关系,表明它们可能形成另一个子域,然而还需要进一步研究来证实这一点。疼痛和瘙痒均被视为独立的多维潜在变量,这需要具有多维结构的评估工具。

结论

在评估整个烧伤瘢痕时,有三个独立维度影响患者认知:(1)生理性瘢痕,(2)疼痛,(3)瘙痒。在生理领域内,颜色形成一个与触觉子域不同的视觉子域。建议在高阶多维结构内对这些领域进行进一步开发。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索