• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Cross-cultural adaptation, reproducibility and validation of the Italian version of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS).跨文化调适、可重复性和意大利版患者与观察者瘢痕评估量表(POSAS)的验证。
Int Wound J. 2017 Dec;14(6):1262-1268. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12795. Epub 2017 Aug 6.
2
The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale: Translation for portuguese language, cultural adaptation, and validation.患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表:翻译为葡萄牙语、文化调适和验证。
Int Wound J. 2019 Dec;16(6):1513-1520. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13228. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
3
Translation and psychometric validation of the Finnish version of the Patient Scar Assessment Scale for use in patients with burn scars.患者烧伤瘢痕评估量表芬兰语版的翻译及心理计量学验证。
Burns. 2023 Aug;49(5):1113-1121. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2022.08.025. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
4
Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Fremantle Knee Awareness Questionnaire in Italian subjects with painful knee osteoarthritis.弗里曼特尔膝关节认知问卷在意大利疼痛性膝骨关节炎患者中的跨文化调适、信度和效度
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Apr 7;19(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01754-4.
5
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire to the Spanish language in head and neck surgery.头颈部外科患者瘢痕评估问卷的跨文化调适与心理计量学验证:西班牙语版。
Int Wound J. 2020 Feb;17(1):21-31. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13218. Epub 2019 Nov 3.
6
The Italian version of the Sickness Impact Profile-Roland Scale for chronic pain: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, validity and sensitivity to change.意大利版 Sickness Impact Profile-Roland 量表用于慢性疼痛:跨文化适应性、信度、效度和变化敏感性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(15-16):1299-305. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2010.527030. Epub 2010 Oct 29.
7
The cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the MSSS-88 for use in Italian patients with multiple sclerosis.多 sclerosis 患者使用 MSSS-88 的跨文化调适和心理计量学验证。
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Feb;41(4):465-471. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1393699. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
8
Translation of the Patient Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS) to French with cross-cultural adaptation, reliability evaluation and validation.将患者瘢痕评估量表(PSAS)翻译成法语,并进行跨文化适应、可靠性评估和验证。
Can J Surg. 2009 Dec;52(6):E259-63.
9
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Italian version of the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS).跨文化调适与义大利版髋关节残疾和骨关节炎结局评分(HOOS)的验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Jun 4;16(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0935-6.
10
Cultural adaptation and validation of Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale for Turkish use.《患者及观察者瘢痕评估量表》在土耳其语环境下的文化调适与效度验证
Burns. 2018 Aug;44(5):1352-1356. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.02.026. Epub 2018 Mar 24.

引用本文的文献

1
An Assessment of Current Clinician- and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Acne Scarring and Dyspigmentation: A Scoping Review.痤疮瘢痕和色素沉着的当前临床医生报告及患者报告结局指标评估:一项范围综述
J Invest Dermatol. 2025 Feb 27. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2025.02.135.
2
Functionality and Scar Evaluation of the Donor Site in Extended Radial Forearm Flap Phalloplasty: How Affected Is the Arm in Day-to-Day Life?桡侧前臂游离皮瓣阴茎再造术中供区的功能与瘢痕评估:日常生活中手臂受影响程度如何?
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 9;13(19):6004. doi: 10.3390/jcm13196004.
3
Aesthetic Evaluation of Facial Scars in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Basal Cell Carcinoma: A Prospective Longitudinal Pilot Study and Validation of POSAS 2.0 in the Lithuanian Language.基底细胞癌手术患者面部瘢痕的美学评估:一项前瞻性纵向试点研究及立陶宛语版POSAS 2.0的验证
Cancers (Basel). 2024 May 30;16(11):2091. doi: 10.3390/cancers16112091.
4
Translation and validation of Hindi version of patient scar assessment scale in patients with postburn facial scar.烧伤后面部瘢痕患者 Hindi 版患者瘢痕评估量表的翻译与验证
J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2024 Jan-Mar;17(1):55-59. doi: 10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_11_22.
5
A case series of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy use with purse-string closure in stoma closure wounds in infants.一系列关于预防性负压伤口治疗联合荷包缝合用于婴儿造口闭合伤口的病例。
Surg Case Rep. 2024 Jan 17;10(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s40792-024-01818-9.
6
Quantitative evaluation of pediatric umbilical loop stomas: 2 decades of experience from a single institution.小儿脐环造口术的定量评估:单中心 20 年经验。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2023 Sep 7;39(1):269. doi: 10.1007/s00383-023-05546-3.
7
Comparison of Colorado Needle Electrocautery and Traditional Scalpel for Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty Incision: A Randomized Controlled Trial and Systematic Review.科罗拉多针状电灼术与传统手术刀在上睑成形术切口中的比较:一项随机对照试验及系统评价
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Jun 9;11(6):e5045. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005045. eCollection 2023 Jun.
8
Aesthetic Results, Functional Outcome and Radiographic Analysis in THA by Direct Anterior, Bikini and Postero-Lateral Approach: Is It Worth the Hassle?直接前路、比基尼切口及后外侧入路行全髋关节置换术的美学效果、功能结果及影像学分析:是否值得如此麻烦?
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 30;12(3):1072. doi: 10.3390/jcm12031072.
9
Evaluation of Quality of Life (BREAST-Q) and Scar Quality (POSAS) after Breast Augmentation.隆胸术后生活质量(BREAST-Q)及瘢痕质量(POSAS)评估
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 May 18;10(5):e4313. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004313. eCollection 2022 May.
10
What Type of Incision for Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery Involving Long Segments Can Bring Better Cosmetic and Functional Outcomes?涉及长节段的颈椎前路手术采用哪种切口能带来更好的美容和功能效果?
Neurospine. 2022 Jun;19(2):412-421. doi: 10.14245/ns.2143260.630. Epub 2022 May 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Values of a Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale to Evaluate the Facial Skin Graft Scar.患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表评估面部皮肤移植瘢痕的价值。
Ann Dermatol. 2016 Oct;28(5):615-623. doi: 10.5021/ad.2016.28.5.615. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
2
Patient opinion of scarring is multidimensional: An investigation of the POSAS with confirmatory factor analysis.患者对瘢痕形成的看法具有多维度:使用验证性因素分析对患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表(POSAS)的一项调查。
Burns. 2017 Feb;43(1):58-68. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2016.06.026. Epub 2016 Aug 28.
3
Reliability of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale and a 4-point scale in evaluating linear facial surgical scars.患者及观察者瘢痕评估量表与4分制量表在评估面部线性手术瘢痕中的可靠性
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017 Feb;31(2):341-346. doi: 10.1111/jdv.13805. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
4
Clinimetric properties and clinical utility in rehabilitation of postsurgical scar rating scales: a systematic review.术后瘢痕评定量表在康复中的测量学特性及临床应用:一项系统评价
Int J Rehabil Res. 2015 Dec;38(4):279-86. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000134.
5
Internet-based survey on current practice for evaluation, prevention, and treatment of scars, hypertrophic scars, and keloids.关于瘢痕、增生性瘢痕和瘢痕疙瘩评估、预防及治疗当前实践的基于互联网的调查。
Wound Repair Regen. 2014 Jul-Aug;22(4):483-91. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12185.
6
Differential item functioning in the Observer Scale of the POSAS for different scar types.不同瘢痕类型在POSAS观察者量表中的项目功能差异。
Qual Life Res. 2014 Sep;23(7):2037-45. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0637-4. Epub 2014 Feb 9.
7
Patient-related keloid scar assessment and outcome measures.患者相关的瘢痕疙瘩评估和结局测量。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Mar;129(3):648-656. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182402c51.
8
A clinimetric overview of scar assessment scales.瘢痕评估量表的临床测量学概述。
J Burn Care Res. 2012 Mar-Apr;33(2):e79-87. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e318239f5dd.
9
Is adherent scar always nonpliable?粘连性瘢痕总是缺乏柔韧性吗?
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Jun;127(6):2518-2519. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182131d7f.
10
Rasch analysis of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) in burn scars.烧伤瘢痕患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表(POSAS)的 Rasch 分析。
Qual Life Res. 2012 Feb;21(1):13-23. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9924-5. Epub 2011 May 20.

跨文化调适、可重复性和意大利版患者与观察者瘢痕评估量表(POSAS)的验证。

Cross-cultural adaptation, reproducibility and validation of the Italian version of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS).

机构信息

Laboratory of Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders Assessment, Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpA-SB, Scientific Institute of Veruno, IRCCS, Novara, Italy.

Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpA-SB, Scientific Institute of Lissone, IRCCS, Lissone, Italy.

出版信息

Int Wound J. 2017 Dec;14(6):1262-1268. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12795. Epub 2017 Aug 6.

DOI:10.1111/iwj.12795
PMID:28782201
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7950069/
Abstract

The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) is one of the most robust instruments to assess scar quality, but there is no Italian version, and no other competing instruments are available in Italian. The aim of this study was to translate and validate an Italian version of POSAS (POSAS-I). POSASv2.0 was culturally adapted in accordance with international standards. The psychometric assessment included acceptability/feasibility, internal consistency, reproducibility, construct validity and sensitivity to change. Cultural equivalence of POSAS-I with the English version was confirmed. The validation study included 102 subjects with surgical scars. Both subscales demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0·72-0·80). Reproducibility of the OSAS-I (ICCs = 0·93-0·94; SEM = 1·8 points; MDC = 5·1 points) was superior to that of PSAS-I (ICC = 0·65; SEM = 5·7 points; MDC = 15·7 points). OSAS-I showed moderate to good correlations with the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), Global Rating of Change Scale (GRCS) and PSAS-I. Sensitivity to change was large for PSAS-I (effect size = 1·08; standardised response mean = 0·96) and moderate to large for OSAS-I (ES = 0·69; SRM = 0·92). This study confirmed that POSAS-I can be used to assess patients with surgical scars in the Italian population. OSAS-I is useful for clinical and research purposes, while PSAS-I should be better used to capture patients' own opinions and symptoms in clinical settings.

摘要

患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表(POSAS)是评估瘢痕质量最可靠的工具之一,但它没有意大利语版本,也没有其他意大利语竞争工具。本研究的目的是翻译和验证 POSAS 的意大利语版本(POSAS-I)。POSASv2.0 根据国际标准进行了文化适应性调整。心理测量评估包括可接受性/可行性、内部一致性、再现性、结构有效性和对变化的敏感性。POSAS-I 与英文版具有文化等效性。验证研究包括 102 名接受手术瘢痕的受试者。两个子量表均表现出可接受的内部一致性(Cronbach's α = 0.72-0.80)。POSAS-I 的再现性(ICC = 0.93-0.94;SEM = 1.8 分;MDC = 5.1 分)优于 PSAS-I(ICC = 0.65;SEM = 5.7 分;MDC = 15.7 分)。POSAS-I 与温哥华瘢痕量表(VSS)、总体变化等级量表(GRCS)和 PSAS-I 呈中度至良好相关性。PSAS-I 的变化敏感性较大(效应大小 = 1.08;标准化反应均值 = 0.96),OSAS-I 的变化敏感性为中度至较大(ES = 0.69;SRM = 0.92)。本研究证实 POSAS-I 可用于评估意大利人群中接受手术瘢痕的患者。OSAS-I 可用于临床和研究目的,而 PSAS-I 应更好地用于在临床环境中捕捉患者的自身意见和症状。