Winser Stanley, Smith Catherine M, Hale Leigh A, Claydon Leica S, Whitney Susan L, Klatt Brooke, Mottershead John, Zaydan Islam, Heyman Rock
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.
School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Dunedin, NZ.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Feb;98(2):270-276. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.07.023. Epub 2016 Aug 27.
To examine the reliability, validity, and interpretability of 4 clinical measures in assessing the severity of balance dysfunction among people with cerebellar ataxia (CA) secondary to multiple sclerosis (MS).
Cross-sectional observation study.
Outpatient clinics.
Consecutive participants with CA secondary to MS (N=60).
Not applicable.
Balance was assessed and video recorded using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), timed Up and Go (TUG) test, posture and gait subcomponent of the International Co-operative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS), and gait, stance, and sit subcomponents of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA). The videos were later used to estimate reliability. The Barthel Index, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), ICARS, and SARA were assessed, and disease duration was recorded.
Reliability was good for all 4 measures (intraclass correlation coefficient range, .95-.99). Internal consistency was moderate to good for all 4 measures (α range, .72-.94), with a moderate to good correlation between the measures of balance (Spearman ρ range, .72-.85) and poor to moderate correlation with disease severity (EDSS), functional independence (Barthel Index), and disease duration (Spearman ρ range, -.37 to .76). Minimal detectable change was derived for the BBS (3), posture and gait subcomponent of the ICARS (2), and gait, stance, and sit subcomponents of the SARA (2). Measures were able to discriminate between assistive walking device users and nonusers.
All 4 measures showed good reliability and acceptable validity; however, because of the item repetition in scoring of the posture and gait subcomponent of the ICARS and moderate construct, criterion, and convergent validity of the TUG, the BBS and gait, stance, and sit subcomponents of the SARA are recommended for balance assessment in clinical practice for people with CA secondary to MS.
探讨4种临床测量方法在评估继发于多发性硬化症(MS)的小脑共济失调(CA)患者平衡功能障碍严重程度时的可靠性、有效性和可解释性。
横断面观察研究。
门诊诊所。
连续入选的继发于MS的CA患者(N = 60)。
不适用。
使用伯格平衡量表(BBS)、计时起立行走(TUG)测试、国际合作共济失调评定量表(ICARS)的姿势和步态子分量表以及共济失调评估与评定量表(SARA)的步态、站立和坐立子分量表对平衡功能进行评估并录像。录像随后用于评估可靠性。评估巴氏指数、扩展残疾状态量表(EDSS)、ICARS和SARA,并记录疾病持续时间。
所有4种测量方法的可靠性良好(组内相关系数范围为0.95 - 0.99)。所有4种测量方法的内部一致性为中等至良好(α范围为0.72 - 0.94),平衡测量方法之间的相关性为中等至良好(斯皮尔曼ρ范围为0.72 - 0.85),与疾病严重程度(EDSS)、功能独立性(巴氏指数)和疾病持续时间的相关性为差至中等(斯皮尔曼ρ范围为 - 0.37至0.76)。得出了BBS(3分)、ICARS的姿势和步态子分量表(2分)以及SARA的步态、站立和坐立子分量表(2分)的最小可检测变化。测量方法能够区分使用辅助行走设备的患者和未使用者。
所有4种测量方法均显示出良好的可靠性和可接受的有效性;然而,由于ICARS的姿势和步态子分量表评分中有项目重复,且TUG的结构效度、效标效度和收敛效度中等,因此推荐在临床实践中使用BBS以及SARA的步态、站立和坐立子分量表对继发于MS的CA患者进行平衡评估。