Ross June, Westaway Kira, Travers Meg, Morwood Michael J, Hayward John
Department of Archaeology, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia.
Department of Environmental Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 31;11(8):e0161726. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161726. eCollection 2016.
The recent establishment of a minimum age estimate of 39.9 ka for the origin of rock art in Sulawesi has challenged claims that Western Europe was the locus for the production of the world's earliest art assemblages. Tantalising excavated evidence found across northern Australian suggests that Australia too contains a wealth of ancient art. However, the dating of rock art itself remains the greatest obstacle to be addressed if the significance of Australian assemblages are to be recognised on the world stage. A recent archaeological project in the northwest Kimberley trialled three dating techniques in order to establish chronological markers for the proposed, regional, relative stylistic sequence. Applications using optically-stimulated luminescence (OSL) provided nine minimum age estimates for fossilised mudwasp nests overlying a range of rock art styles, while Accelerator Mass Spectrometry radiocarbon (AMS 14C) results provided an additional four. Results confirm that at least one phase of the northwest Kimberley rock art assemblage is Pleistocene in origin. A complete motif located on the ceiling of a rockshelter returned a minimum age estimate of 16 ± 1 ka. Further, our results demonstrate the inherent problems in relying solely on stylistic classifications to order rock art assemblages into temporal sequences. An earlier than expected minimum age estimate for one style and a maximum age estimate for another together illustrate that the Holocene Kimberley rock art sequence is likely to be far more complex than generally accepted with different styles produced contemporaneously well into the last few millennia. It is evident that reliance on techniques that produce minimum age estimates means that many more dating programs will need to be undertaken before the stylistic sequence can be securely dated.
最近对苏拉威西岛岩石艺术起源的最低年龄估计为39.9 ka,这对西欧是世界上最早艺术组合发源地的说法提出了挑战。在澳大利亚北部发现的引人入胜的挖掘证据表明,澳大利亚也拥有丰富的古代艺术。然而,如果要在世界舞台上认可澳大利亚艺术组合的重要性,岩石艺术本身的年代测定仍然是需要解决的最大障碍。最近在金伯利西北部的一个考古项目试验了三种年代测定技术,以便为提议的区域相对风格序列建立年代标记。使用光激发发光(OSL)的应用为覆盖一系列岩石艺术风格的化石泥蜂巢穴提供了九个最低年龄估计,而加速器质谱放射性碳(AMS 14C)结果又提供了另外四个。结果证实,金伯利西北部岩石艺术组合的至少一个阶段起源于更新世。一个位于岩石庇护所天花板上的完整图案返回的最低年龄估计为16±1 ka。此外,我们的结果表明,仅依靠风格分类将岩石艺术组合按时间顺序排列存在内在问题。一种风格的最低年龄估计早于预期,而另一种风格的最高年龄估计则表明,全新世金伯利岩石艺术序列可能比普遍接受的要复杂得多,不同风格在过去几千年中一直同时产生。很明显,依赖产生最低年龄估计的技术意味着在确定风格序列的年代之前,需要进行更多的年代测定项目。