• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于附件包块管理的磁共振成像评分系统的外部验证

External validation of the MR imaging scoring system for the management of adnexal masses.

作者信息

Ruiz Mireille, Labauge Pénélope, Louboutin Anne, Limot Olivier, Fauconnier Arnaud, Huchon Cyrille

机构信息

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, CHI Poissy-St-Germain, 10, rue du Champ Gaillard, 78300 Poissy, France.

Department of Radiology, CHI Poissy-St-Germain, 10, rue du Champ Gaillard, 78300 Poissy, France.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Oct;205:115-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.07.493. Epub 2016 Aug 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.07.493
PMID:27583370
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the prognostic value of ADNEX Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring in the preoperative management of adnexal masses.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a retrospective study on patients who underwent surgery for an adnexal mass, with prior exploration by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), at the Gynecology Department of the Poissy Teaching Hospital between May 2012 and August 2014. MRI data were retrospectively read by radiologists, without knowledge of the histology, and classified according to the criteria of the ADNEX MR score. The radiological presumption of benign or malignant mass was compared with the final histological diagnosis. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios and ROC curve of the ADNEX MR score with their 95% confidence intervals (95%CI).

RESULTS

One-hundred-and-forty-eight patients were included in the study of which 24 had malignant or borderline ovarian tumors. The proportion of malignant or borderline ovarian tumors in each class of the ADNEX MR score in our study was: ADNEX I: 0% (95%CI, 0-8); ADNEX II: 1.7% (95%CI, 0.04-8.9); ADNEX III: 7.7% (95%CI, 0.2-36); ADNEX IV: 57.1% (95%CI, 34.2-78.8) and ADNEX V: 100% (95%CI, 69.2-100). Thus, for an ADNEX MR score greater than or equal to 4, the sensitivity was 91.7% (95%CI, 73-99) and the specificity 92.7% (95%CI, 86.7-96.6) for the diagnosis of a malignant or borderline ovarian tumor. The area under the ROC curve was 0.92 (95% CI%, 0.86-0.98).

CONCLUSIONS

MRI, coupled with the use of the ADNEX MR scoring system, can accurately classify adnexal masses into low-risk (ADNEX MR score <4) or high-risk (ADNEX MR score ≥4) group, thereby allowing for appropriate preoperative counseling and planning for surgery.

摘要

目的

探讨附件磁共振成像评分在附件包块术前管理中的预后价值。

研究设计

我们对2012年5月至2014年8月在普瓦西教学医院妇科因附件包块接受手术且术前进行过磁共振成像(MRI)检查的患者进行了一项回顾性研究。放射科医生在不知组织学结果的情况下对MRI数据进行回顾性解读,并根据附件磁共振成像(ADNEX MR)评分标准进行分类。将良性或恶性包块的影像学推测与最终组织学诊断进行比较。我们计算了ADNEX MR评分的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性似然比以及ROC曲线及其95%置信区间(95%CI)。

结果

148例患者纳入本研究,其中24例患有恶性或交界性卵巢肿瘤。在我们的研究中,ADNEX MR评分各等级中恶性或交界性卵巢肿瘤的比例为:ADNEX I:0%(95%CI,0 - 8);ADNEX II:1.7%(95%CI,0.04 - 8.9);ADNEX III:7.7%(95%CI,0.2 - 36);ADNEX IV:57.1%(95%CI,34.2 - 78.8);ADNEX V:100%(95%CI,69.2 - 100)。因此,对于ADNEX MR评分大于或等于4的情况,诊断恶性或交界性卵巢肿瘤的敏感性为91.7%(95%CI,73 - 99),特异性为92.7%(95%CI,86.7 - 96.6)。ROC曲线下面积为0.92(95%CI,0.86 - 0.98)。

结论

MRI结合ADNEX MR评分系统可将附件包块准确分为低风险(ADNEX MR评分<4)或高风险(ADNEX MR评分≥4)组,从而为术前咨询和手术规划提供依据。

相似文献

1
External validation of the MR imaging scoring system for the management of adnexal masses.用于附件包块管理的磁共振成像评分系统的外部验证
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Oct;205:115-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.07.493. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
2
Accuracy of the ADNEX MR scoring system based on a simplified MRI protocol for the assessment of adnexal masses.基于简化MRI方案的ADNEX MR评分系统对附件肿块评估的准确性。
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2018 Mar-Apr;24(2):63-71. doi: 10.5152/dir.2018.17378.
3
Magnetic resonance scoring system for assessment of adnexal masses: added value of diffusion-weighted imaging including apparent diffusion coefficient map.磁共振附件肿块评分系统:扩散加权成像(包括表观扩散系数图)的附加价值。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Mar;57(3):478-487. doi: 10.1002/uog.22090.
4
Performance of IOTA ADNEX model in evaluating adnexal masses in a gynecological oncology center in China.IOTA ADNEX 模型在中国妇科肿瘤中心评估附件肿块的性能。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Dec;54(6):815-822. doi: 10.1002/uog.20363. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
5
Performance of the IOTA ADNEX model in preoperative discrimination of adnexal masses in a gynecological oncology center.IOTA ADNEX模型在妇科肿瘤中心术前鉴别附件包块中的表现
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;49(6):778-783. doi: 10.1002/uog.15963. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
6
Estimating risk of malignancy in adnexal masses: external validation of the ADNEX model and comparison with other frequently used ultrasound methods.附件包块恶性风险评估:ADNEX模型的外部验证及与其他常用超声方法的比较
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;49(6):784-792. doi: 10.1002/uog.17225.
7
Prospective external validation of IOTA methods for classifying adnexal masses and retrospective assessment of two-step strategy using benign descriptors and ADNEX model: Portuguese multicenter study.前瞻性验证 IOTA 方法对附件包块的分类,以及使用良性描述符和 ADNEX 模型对两步策略的回顾性评估:葡萄牙多中心研究。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Oct;64(4):538-549. doi: 10.1002/uog.27641. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
8
Diagnostic Accuracies of the Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging ADNEX Scoring Systems For Ovarian Adnexal Mass: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.超声和磁共振成像ADNEX评分系统对卵巢附件包块的诊断准确性:系统评价与Meta分析
Acad Radiol. 2022 Jun;29(6):897-908. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2021.05.029. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
9
Validation of ADNEX and IOTA two-step strategy and estimation of risk of complications during follow-up of adnexal masses in low-risk population.验证 ADNEX 和 IOTA 两步策略,并估计低危人群附件包块随访期间并发症的风险。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Sep;64(3):395-404. doi: 10.1002/uog.27642. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
10
Adnexal masses: development and preliminary validation of an MR imaging scoring system.附件肿块:磁共振成像评分系统的发展与初步验证。
Radiology. 2013 May;267(2):432-43. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13121161. Epub 2013 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Unenhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of sonographically indeterminate ovarian and adnexal masses.用于评估超声检查结果不确定的卵巢及附件肿块的非增强磁共振成像。
Radiol Bras. 2025 Feb 7;58:e20240032. doi: 10.1590/0100-3984.2024.0032. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
MRI Evaluation and Characterization of Ovarian Lesions Based on Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System MRI.基于卵巢附件报告和数据系统MRI的卵巢病变的MRI评估与特征分析
Cureus. 2024 Aug 27;16(8):e67904. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67904. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Pattern Recognition or Adnexal MR Scoring System: Which Is More Accurate in Evaluating Adnexal Lesions?
附件磁共振成像评分系统与模式识别:哪项更能准确评估附件病变?
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024 Apr 1;25(4):1265-1270. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.4.1265.
4
O-RADS MRI scoring system: key points for correct application in inexperienced hands.O-RADS MRI评分系统: inexperienced hands正确应用的关键点。 (注:这里“inexperienced hands”字面意思是“无经验的手”,结合语境可能是指缺乏经验的使用者等意思,整体译文可能稍显生硬,但严格按照要求翻译)
Insights Imaging. 2024 Apr 12;15(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s13244-024-01670-3.
5
O-RADS MRI to classify adnexal tumors: from clinical problem to daily use.用于对附件肿瘤进行分类的O-RADS MRI:从临床问题到日常应用
Insights Imaging. 2024 Jan 30;15(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s13244-023-01598-0.
6
Modified MR scoring system for assessment of sonographically indeterminate ovarian and adnexal masses in the absence of dynamic contrast-enhanced.改良的磁共振评分系统,用于评估无动态对比增强的超声不确定卵巢和附件肿块。
Br J Radiol. 2024 Jan 23;97(1153):150-158. doi: 10.1093/bjr/tqad005.
7
Impact of DWI and ADC values in Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) MRI score.磁共振成像报告和数据系统(O-RADS)中 DWI 和 ADC 值对卵巢附件的影响。
Radiol Med. 2023 May;128(5):565-577. doi: 10.1007/s11547-023-01628-3. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
8
Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (O-RADS MRI): Genesis and Future Directions.卵巢-附件磁共振成像报告和数据系统(O-RADS MRI):起源和未来方向。
Can Assoc Radiol J. 2023 May;74(2):370-381. doi: 10.1177/08465371221121738. Epub 2022 Oct 16.
9
[Adnexal Masses: Clinical Application of Multiparametric MR Imaging & O-RADS MRI].[附件肿物:多参数磁共振成像及O-RADS MRI的临床应用]
Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi. 2021 Sep;82(5):1066-1082. doi: 10.3348/jksr.2021.0111. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
10
O-RADS MRI Risk Stratification System: Guide for Assessing Adnexal Lesions from the ACR O-RADS Committee.O-RADS MRI 风险分层系统:ACR O-RADS 委员会评估附件病变的指南。
Radiology. 2022 Apr;303(1):35-47. doi: 10.1148/radiol.204371. Epub 2022 Jan 18.